NASA's $80M Marshall Program Support Services Contract Awarded to Manufacturing Technical Solutions, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $80,034,315 ($80.0M)
Contractor: Manufacturing Technical Solutions, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2013-10-01
End Date: 2021-08-31
Contract Duration: 2,891 days
Daily Burn Rate: $27.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Engineering Services
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF TASK ORDER (TO)TO PROVIDE THE MARSHALL INTEGRATED PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES (MIPSS) PROGRAM PLANNING AND CONTROL (PP&C) SERVICES AT MARSHAL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35812
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $80.0 million to MANUFACTURING TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF TASK ORDER (TO)TO PROVIDE THE MARSHALL INTEGRATED PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES (MIPSS) PROGRAM PLANNING AND CONTROL (PP&C) SERVICES AT MARSHAL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER Key points: 1. Contract awarded via BPA Call under full and open competition. 2. Long duration (2891 days) with significant value ($80M). 3. Focus on engineering services (NAICS 541330) for program planning and control. 4. No small business participation noted.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $80M over nearly 8 years suggests a substantial need for these services. Benchmarking against similar engineering support contracts would be necessary to fully assess pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Awarded via BPA Call, indicating a pre-competed framework. Full and open competition is generally positive for price discovery, but the specific BPA call's competition level is key.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to secure the best value for taxpayers, though the long duration and significant value warrant ongoing scrutiny.
Public Impact
Supports critical program planning and control functions at Marshall Space Flight Center. Long-term commitment indicates sustained need for specialized engineering expertise. Potential for follow-on work or similar contracts in aerospace engineering services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration may limit flexibility and price adjustments.
- Lack of small business participation could be a missed opportunity for economic development.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Clear statement of work for program planning and control.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical area for government agencies like NASA. Spending in this sector is often driven by complex project requirements and long-term research and development.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not awarded to a small business, and there is no indication of small business subcontracting. This represents a missed opportunity to leverage small business capabilities in specialized engineering support.
Oversight & Accountability
The award through a BPA Call suggests some level of pre-competition and oversight. However, the long duration necessitates continuous monitoring of performance and cost-effectiveness by NASA.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration potentially leading to cost inefficiencies.
- Lack of small business participation.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical support functions over an extended period.
- Potential for scope creep without rigorous oversight.
Tags
engineering-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, al, bpa-call, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $80.0 million to MANUFACTURING TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF TASK ORDER (TO)TO PROVIDE THE MARSHALL INTEGRATED PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES (MIPSS) PROGRAM PLANNING AND CONTROL (PP&C) SERVICES AT MARSHAL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MANUFACTURING TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $80.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2013-10-01. End: 2021-08-31.
What specific program planning and control services are included, and how do they align with NASA's mission objectives?
The contract supports the Marshall Integrated Program Support Services (MIPSS) at Marshall Space Flight Center. This likely encompasses a range of activities such as budget formulation, financial management, schedule tracking, risk assessment, and resource allocation to ensure the successful execution of NASA's programs and projects.
What were the key evaluation criteria used in the BPA Call competition to ensure the best value was obtained?
While the data indicates full and open competition via a BPA Call, specific evaluation criteria are not provided. Typically, such evaluations would consider technical approach, past performance, management capability, and price. Understanding these criteria is crucial for assessing the rigor of the price discovery process.
How will NASA ensure continued cost-effectiveness and performance management over the 2891-day contract duration?
NASA will likely employ robust contract management practices, including regular performance reviews, milestone tracking, and potentially periodic price reviews if contract terms allow. Proactive oversight and clear communication channels with Manufacturing Technical Solutions, LLC are essential to maintain value and address any emerging issues.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 308 VOYAGER WAY NW # 100, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $80,223,543
Exercised Options: $80,212,495
Current Obligation: $80,034,315
Actual Outlays: $28,748,455
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNM13AA04Z
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2013-10-01
Current End Date: 2021-08-31
Potential End Date: 2021-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-05-22
More Contracts from Manufacturing Technical Solutions, LLC
- Task Order(to)to Provide the Marshall Integrated Program Support Services (mipss) Programmatic Subject Matter Experts(sme) Services AT Marshal Space Flight Center — $125.9M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Task Order(to)to Provide the Marshall Integrated Program Support Services (mipss) Project Coordination (PC) Services AT Marshal Space Flight Center — $100.9M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all Manufacturing Technical Solutions, LLC federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →