NASA Awards $20M Engineering Support Contract to Leidos, Inc. via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,029,901 ($20.0M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2009-04-17
End Date: 2013-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,719 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: R&D
Official Description: ARES PROJECTS OFFICE (APO) INTEGRATION AND SENIOR ENGINEERING SUPPORT.
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35812
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $20.0 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: ARES PROJECTS OFFICE (APO) INTEGRATION AND SENIOR ENGINEERING SUPPORT. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Leidos, Inc. for engineering support services. 2. Significant value of $20.03 million over its duration. 3. Procured through full and open competition, suggesting market availability. 4. Services fall under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330).
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $20.03 million over approximately 4.7 years (1719 days) suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific task orders or detailed cost breakdowns, a precise pricing assessment is difficult, but the duration and value are within typical ranges for complex engineering support.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the agency to select the best value offering.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically leads to more favorable pricing for taxpayers by leveraging market forces to drive down costs and ensure quality.
Public Impact
Supports critical NASA projects requiring specialized engineering expertise. Potential for technological advancements and mission success through integrated support. Contract duration of nearly five years provides stability for project continuity.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics or KPIs in provided data.
- Potential for cost overruns in Time and Materials contracts if not managed closely.
Positive Signals
- Awarded via full and open competition.
- Experienced contractor (Leidos, Inc.).
- Long-term contract provides stability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is crucial for government agencies like NASA that rely on specialized technical expertise for complex projects. Spending benchmarks for this sector vary widely based on project scope and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses and was awarded to a large business (Leidos, Inc.). There is no indication of small business participation in this specific award.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was made by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), a federal agency with established oversight mechanisms. However, the effectiveness of oversight for this specific contract would depend on internal NASA processes and monitoring of the Time and Materials contract.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data.
- No indication of small business subcontracting goals.
- Contract duration is substantial, requiring ongoing oversight.
Tags
engineering-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, al, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $20.0 million to LEIDOS, INC.. ARES PROJECTS OFFICE (APO) INTEGRATION AND SENIOR ENGINEERING SUPPORT.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-04-17. End: 2013-12-31.
What specific engineering disciplines and tasks are covered under this contract, and how do they align with NASA's current strategic objectives?
The provided data lacks specifics on the engineering disciplines and tasks. To assess alignment, one would need to review the Statement of Work (SOW) for details on areas like systems engineering, software development, or aerospace design. This would then be compared against NASA's current mission priorities and research goals to determine the strategic relevance and potential impact of the support provided.
How effectively was the pricing structured within the Time and Materials (T&M) framework to mitigate risks of cost escalation and ensure fair value?
Time and Materials contracts inherently carry a risk of cost escalation if not managed diligently. Effective pricing would involve clearly defined labor categories with pre-negotiated rates, strict controls on hours worked, and robust oversight to ensure tasks are necessary and efficient. Without access to the contract's specific rate structure, ceilings, and NASA's monitoring protocols, it's difficult to definitively assess the effectiveness of the pricing in mitigating risk and ensuring fair value.
What mechanisms are in place to measure the contractor's performance and ensure the successful integration and senior engineering support delivered meets NASA's evolving needs?
NASA typically employs performance management plans and contract officer representatives (CORs) to monitor contractor performance. For this contract, success measurement would likely involve tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) related to project milestones, technical accuracy, responsiveness, and adherence to schedules. Ensuring integration and support meets evolving needs requires proactive communication, regular reviews, and potentially contract modifications to adapt to changing requirements.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 1710 SAIC DRIVE, ROOM #8033, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,034,442
Exercised Options: $21,034,442
Current Obligation: $20,029,901
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNM06AA12Z
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-04-17
Current End Date: 2013-12-31
Potential End Date: 2013-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-01-13
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →