NASA awards $47M for SAP MSFC ODIN Desktop & Network services to OAO Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $47,053,662 ($47.1M)
Contractor: OAO Corporation
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2004-12-01
End Date: 2008-07-31
Contract Duration: 1,338 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.2K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: 4200091243 SAP MSFC ODIN DESKTOP & NETWORK
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35812, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $47.1 million to OAO CORPORATION for work described as: 4200091243 SAP MSFC ODIN DESKTOP & NETWORK Key points: 1. Contract awarded for custom computer programming services. 2. OAO Corporation is the prime contractor. 3. The contract was awarded by NASA. 4. This is a competitive delivery order.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $47,053,662 for a duration of 1338 days suggests a moderate per-diem rate. Without specific unit breakdowns, a precise comparison is difficult, but it appears within a reasonable range for complex IT services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
This was a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors likely had the opportunity to bid. The competitive nature should have driven price discovery, though the specific mechanism isn't detailed.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential IT infrastructure and services for NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.
Public Impact
Supports critical IT infrastructure for NASA's space exploration and research. Ensures operational continuity for desktop and network services at MSFC. Leverages private sector expertise for government technology needs.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics.
- Potential for cost overruns if scope changes.
- Dependency on a single vendor for critical services.
Positive Signals
- Competitive award process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type.
- Long-term support for essential functions.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Custom Computer Programming Services sector, which is a significant area of government IT spending. Benchmarks for similar contracts would focus on the complexity of the systems supported and the duration of the service.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not awarded to a small business, as indicated by 'sb': false. This suggests larger, established IT service providers are competing for these types of contracts.
Oversight & Accountability
NASA's procurement processes are subject to federal oversight. The competitive delivery order mechanism implies a structured process, but ongoing monitoring of performance and costs is crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Custom Computer Programming Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited scope detail.
- Potential for vendor lock-in.
- Reliance on contractor performance.
- No explicit small business participation.
Tags
custom-computer-programming-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, al, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $47.1 million to OAO CORPORATION. 4200091243 SAP MSFC ODIN DESKTOP & NETWORK
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is OAO CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $47.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-12-01. End: 2008-07-31.
What specific SAP modules and network components are covered under this contract?
The contract details are limited, but 'SAP MSFC ODIN DESKTOP & NETWORK' suggests comprehensive support for SAP enterprise resource planning systems, alongside the desktop and network infrastructure at the Marshall Space Flight Center. Further clarification would be needed to understand the exact scope of services and technologies involved.
How does the per-unit cost compare to industry standards for similar IT support contracts?
Without a breakdown of specific services (e.g., per-user support, network maintenance hours, software licenses), a direct per-unit cost comparison is challenging. The total value of $47M over nearly four years suggests a significant investment, and its reasonableness depends heavily on the scope and complexity of the IT environment managed.
What mechanisms are in place to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of OAO Corporation's service delivery?
As a Firm Fixed Price contract awarded competitively, there's an inherent incentive for the contractor to deliver efficiently. NASA likely has performance standards and reporting requirements, but the specific metrics and oversight procedures are not detailed in the provided data, making it difficult to assess effectiveness fully.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)
Address: 7375 EXECUTIVE PLACE, SEABROOK, MD, 20706
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $78,472,889
Exercised Options: $78,472,889
Current Obligation: $47,053,662
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NAS598144
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-12-01
Current End Date: 2008-07-31
Potential End Date: 2008-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-07-07
More Contracts from OAO Corporation
- 200101!000092!5700!CA03 !21 Cons/Lgc !F0560400C9004 !a!n!*!y!p00002 !20001001!20010331!149299679!149299679!074830209!n!oao Corporation !2020 N Academy Blvd !colorado Sprin !co!80909!14142!041!08!cheyenne MTN Complex!el Paso !colorado !+000001966495!n!n!000000000000!m127!operation/Electronic & Communication Facilities !S1 !services !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !513390!*!*!3! ! !C!*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !N!R!2!004!B! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !c!c!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $92.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $86.1M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Federal Contract — $22.9M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- ADP Systems Development Services — $22.0M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Federal Contract — $21.9M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →