NASA's $279M Facilities Support Contract Awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. for Operations and Maintenance
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,919,985 ($27.9M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2014-02-01
End Date: 2025-07-31
Contract Duration: 4,198 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MODULE (CMM) SYSTEM FOR FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL TASK ORDER WITH A STATEMENT OF WORK AND OTHER TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED FOR FUNDING OBLIGATIONS ONLY AND TO ACCOUNT FOR CMM AND SAP FINANCIAL SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY. THIS "TASK ORDER" IS TO FUND NNL13AA14C CLIN 401 (CPAF IDIQ). CENTER MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS, AND ENGINEERING (CMOE) CONTRACT. REQUIREMENT FOR THE MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS, AND ENGINEERING OF LARC'S INSTITUTIONAL FACILITIES AND HIGHLY TECHNICAL RESEARCH FACILITIES FOR MISSION SUCCESS. THE CMOE CONTRACT WILL PROVIDE CORE SUPPORT SERVICES TO LARC IN THE AREAS OF INSTITUTIONAL AND RESEARCH OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND ENGINEERING (OME). THESE TECHNICAL SERVICES INCLUDE: RESEARCH FACILITIES OPERATIONS (E.G., HIGHLY SPECIALIZED WIND TUNNELS, LABORATORIES, TEST STANDS, INSTRUMENTATION CALIBRATION/REPAIR); CENTRAL UTILITIES OPERATIONS (E.G., STEAM, COMPRESSED AIR, ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION, POTABLE WATER); TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT/ADMINISTRATION (E.G., FACILITY AUTOMATION SYSTEMS [FAS], DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEMS [DAS]); RESEARCH AND INSTITUTIONAL FACILITY MAINTENANCE (E.G., PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE, TROUBLE CALLS, RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE [RCM], FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT [FCA]); AND FACILITY ENGINEERING (E.G., DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT, TACTICAL ENGINEERING, PRESSURE SYSTEM RECERTIFICATION, PROJECT MANAGEMENT/PLANNING SUPPORT).
Place of Performance
Location: HAMPTON, HAMPTON CITY County, VIRGINIA, 23681
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $27.9 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MODULE (CMM) SYSTEM FOR FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL TASK ORDER WITH A STATEMENT OF WORK AND OTHER TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED FOR FUNDING OBLIGATIONS ONLY AN… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential maintenance, operations, and engineering for NASA's Langley Research Center facilities. 2. Amentum Technology, Inc. secured this significant award, indicating strong performance or competitive positioning. 3. The contract's duration extends over a decade, suggesting a long-term need for these services. 4. Funding mechanism is Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF), allowing for performance-based incentives. 5. The contract is categorized under Facilities Support Services, a critical component of research infrastructure. 6. This award represents a substantial investment in maintaining advanced research and institutional facilities.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $279.2 million over approximately 11 years suggests a substantial but potentially reasonable annual cost for comprehensive facilities support at a major research center like NASA's Langley Research Center. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities management contracts for federal research institutions would be necessary for a definitive value-for-money assessment. The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure implies that the final cost could vary based on performance, offering a degree of flexibility and incentive for efficiency.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders likely participated. This competitive process is generally expected to drive better pricing and service quality. The specific number of bidders and their proposals would provide further insight into the intensity of the competition and its impact on the final negotiated price and terms.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions, ensuring federal funds are used efficiently.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA's Langley Research Center by ensuring the operational readiness of critical research and institutional facilities. Delivers essential services including maintenance, operations, and engineering for highly technical research environments. Supports the continuity of NASA's research missions and scientific endeavors. Impacts the workforce through employment opportunities for personnel skilled in facilities management and engineering. Ensures a safe and functional working environment for researchers and staff at LARC.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contracts if performance incentives are not effectively managed.
- Long contract duration could lead to complacency if oversight is not rigorous.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical facility operations poses a risk if performance degrades significantly.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that likely secured favorable terms.
- The CPAF structure incentivizes contractor performance, potentially leading to higher quality services.
- Long-term contract provides stability and predictability for essential facility support services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing the management and maintenance of physical infrastructure. This sector is crucial for government agencies, particularly those operating large research and development facilities like NASA. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous large and small businesses offering specialized expertise. The $279 million value over its term places this contract as a significant award within this domain, reflecting the scale and complexity of NASA's requirements.
Small Business Impact
While the contract was awarded through full and open competition, there is no explicit indication of a small business set-aside. Amentum Technology, Inc. is a large business. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist within the scope of this contract, but this would depend on Amentum's subcontracting plan and the specific needs of the services required. Further analysis of subcontracting goals would be needed to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is likely managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers, who are responsible for monitoring performance, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and approving award fees. The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure necessitates robust performance metrics and regular evaluations. Transparency is generally maintained through contract reporting requirements, though specific details of performance reviews may not be publicly disclosed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Langley Research Center Operations and Maintenance Contracts
- Federal Facilities Management Services
- Research and Development Infrastructure Support
- Cost Plus Award Fee Contracts
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may reduce flexibility for adopting new technologies.
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure requires diligent oversight to manage costs and ensure value.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical infrastructure operations.
Tags
facilities-support, nasa, langley-research-center, amentum-technology-inc, cost-plus-award-fee, full-and-open-competition, operations-and-maintenance, research-and-development, virginia, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $27.9 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. IGF::CT::IGF THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED IN THE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT MODULE (CMM) SYSTEM FOR FUNDING PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT AN ACTUAL TASK ORDER WITH A STATEMENT OF WORK AND OTHER TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. THIS "TASK ORDER" HAS BEEN CREATED FOR FUNDING OBLIGATIONS ONLY AND TO ACCOUNT FOR CMM AND SAP FINANCIAL SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY. THIS "TASK ORDER" IS TO FUND NNL13AA14C CLIN 401 (CPAF IDIQ). CENTER MAINTENANCE, OPERATIONS, AND ENGINEERING (CMOE) CONTRACT. REQUIREMENT FOR THE MAINTENANC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2014-02-01. End: 2025-07-31.
What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at NASA's Langley Research Center?
Analyzing historical spending for facilities support at NASA's Langley Research Center (LARC) is crucial for context. While specific historical data for LARC's facilities operations and maintenance (OME) is not provided in the current data, typical patterns for such large federal research centers involve significant, consistent annual investments. These investments are driven by the need to maintain complex, specialized infrastructure, including laboratories, testing facilities, and administrative buildings. Spending often fluctuates based on major repair cycles, upgrades, and the scope of services contracted. Contracts like the CMOE (Center Maintenance, Operations, and Engineering) are designed to consolidate and manage these ongoing needs efficiently. A detailed review would involve examining previous contract awards for similar services at LARC, noting their values, durations, and the scope of work to understand trends in cost and service delivery over time.
How does the annual cost of this contract compare to similar facilities support contracts at other federal research institutions?
To benchmark the annual cost of this $279.2 million contract (spanning approximately 11 years, averaging around $25.4 million per year), comparisons should be made with similar facilities support contracts at other major federal research institutions, such as those managed by the Department of Energy (national labs), the Department of Defense (research facilities), or other NASA centers. Factors influencing cost include the size and complexity of the facilities, the criticality of the research conducted, geographic location (affecting labor and material costs), and the specific services included (e.g., basic maintenance vs. highly specialized engineering support). Without direct comparative data on annual spending for equivalent facilities, it's challenging to definitively state if this contract represents excellent, good, or fair value. However, the scale suggests it is in line with supporting a significant research complex.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Amentum Technology, Inc. under this Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract?
Under a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are critical for determining the 'award fee' portion of the contractor's compensation. While the specific KPIs for this NASA CMOE contract are not detailed in the provided data, they typically align with the core requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW). For facilities support, common KPIs often include metrics related to response times for maintenance requests (e.g., emergency vs. routine), preventative maintenance completion rates, facility uptime/availability for critical research equipment, energy efficiency targets, safety incident rates, compliance with environmental regulations, and overall customer satisfaction surveys from LARC personnel. NASA would establish objective and subjective criteria against which Amentum's performance is measured, with higher performance ratings leading to higher award fees.
What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with NASA and other federal agencies for similar large-scale facilities management contracts?
Amentum Technology, Inc. (and its predecessor entities) has a significant track record in providing large-scale facilities management and engineering services to various U.S. federal agencies, including NASA and the Department of Defense. Their experience often encompasses operations, maintenance, sustainment, and modernization of complex infrastructure. For NASA specifically, evaluating their past performance on contracts at other centers or for similar types of support would be relevant. A review of past performance evaluations, any contract disputes, or awards would provide insight into their reliability, technical capabilities, and cost control effectiveness. Given the scale and duration of this new contract, NASA would have likely conducted a thorough review of Amentum's past performance as part of the source selection process.
What are the potential risks associated with the long duration (over 10 years) of this facilities support contract?
The long duration of this contract (February 1, 2014, to July 31, 2025, totaling over 11 years) presents several potential risks. Firstly, there's the risk of contractor complacency; a contractor might reduce efforts to innovate or maintain peak performance once a long-term commitment is secured. Secondly, technology and facility needs can evolve significantly over a decade. The contract's flexibility to adapt to new technologies, changing research requirements, or unforeseen infrastructure challenges might be tested. Thirdly, long-term reliance on a single provider can reduce market pressure for continuous improvement. Finally, economic uncertainties or shifts in agency priorities over such a long period could create challenges in maintaining consistent funding or scope, potentially leading to contract modifications or disputes. Robust oversight and clear mechanisms for adaptation are crucial to mitigate these risks.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: NNL13458016R
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC
Address: 600 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD, TULLAHOMA, TN, 37388
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $28,300,000
Exercised Options: $28,300,000
Current Obligation: $27,919,985
Actual Outlays: $-102
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 73
Total Subaward Amount: $10,029,047
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNL13AA14C
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2014-02-01
Current End Date: 2025-07-31
Potential End Date: 2025-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-01
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →