NASA's $67.4M ODIN Delivery Order to Lockheed Martin for Computer Systems Design Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $67,381,669 ($67.4M)
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2007-04-01
End Date: 2012-02-29
Contract Duration: 1,795 days
Daily Burn Rate: $37.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: ODIN DELIVERY ORDER
Place of Performance
Location: LANHAM, PRINCE GEORGE'S County, MARYLAND, 20706
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $67.4 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION for work described as: ODIN DELIVERY ORDER Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $67.4 million over nearly 5 years. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. Potential risk associated with a single award for a large sum. 4. Services fall under Computer Systems Design, a common IT sector area.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $67.4 million over 1795 days suggests a substantial investment. Without specific per-unit cost data or comparison to similar, recent contracts for comparable services, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. The firm fixed-price structure aims to control costs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes price discovery and can lead to more competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more favorable price than a sole-source or limited competition scenario.
Public Impact
Taxpayers benefit from competitive bidding processes that aim to secure fair pricing. The duration of the contract indicates a long-term need for these computer systems design services. Transparency in contract awards allows for public scrutiny and accountability.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics or outcome data.
- Potential for cost overruns if scope creeps beyond initial fixed-price agreement.
- Concentration of a large award to a single entity.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Firm fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty.
- Clear contract start and end dates.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT sector, specifically computer systems design services. Spending in this area is crucial for government operations, but benchmarks vary widely based on complexity and specific requirements. The $67.4M over nearly 5 years represents a significant, but not unprecedented, investment for specialized IT support.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was awarded to Lockheed Martin Corporation, a large prime contractor. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting opportunities for small businesses on this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), a federal agency with established oversight mechanisms. The firm fixed-price structure provides some level of cost control. However, ongoing monitoring of performance and adherence to the contract scope is essential for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Systems Design Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Large contract value awarded to a single entity.
- Contract duration of nearly 5 years.
- Lack of detailed service description.
- No explicit mention of small business subcontracting.
Tags
computer-systems-design-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, md, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $67.4 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ODIN DELIVERY ORDER
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $67.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-04-01. End: 2012-02-29.
What specific computer systems design services were procured under this order, and how do they align with NASA's mission objectives?
The contract specifies 'Computer Systems Design Services' (NAICS 541512). While the exact nature of these services isn't detailed, they likely involve the design, development, integration, and testing of complex computer systems essential for NASA's scientific research, space exploration, or operational support. Understanding the specific applications would clarify their direct contribution to mission success.
Given the $67.4M value and firm fixed-price structure, what are the primary risks to cost control and potential for contractor profit?
The primary risk to cost control lies in potential scope creep if the requirements evolve significantly beyond the initial agreement, potentially leading to change orders. For the contractor, profit is maximized by efficiently delivering the defined scope within budget. Risks include unforeseen technical challenges or underestimation of effort, which could reduce profit margins.
How effective was the 'full and open competition' in ensuring the best value for taxpayers on this specific contract?
Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging multiple bids, driving down prices. Without access to the bid proposals and the evaluation criteria used, it's difficult to definitively assess 'best value'. However, the process itself suggests a strong effort to obtain competitive pricing and a suitable technical solution for the government.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)
Address: 700 N FREDERICK AVE LOC B, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Federally Funded Research and Development Corp, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $68,054,809
Exercised Options: $68,054,809
Current Obligation: $67,381,669
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NAS598145
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-04-01
Current End Date: 2012-02-29
Potential End Date: 2012-02-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-10-24
More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Modification IS to Award F-35A Lrip 15 Usaf Aircraft* Long Lead Funding — $30.1B (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Award Long Lead Funding for F-35A, F-35B, and F-35C Aircraft for U.S. Services, Non-Dod Partners, and FMS Customers — $24.5B (Department of Defense)
- Lrip 11 AAC — $12.3B (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →