NASA's $193.6M Aircraft Maintenance Contract Awarded to PAE Applied Technologies
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $193,653,857 ($193.7M)
Contractor: PAE Applied Technologies LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2004-03-01
End Date: 2009-08-31
Contract Duration: 2,009 days
Daily Burn Rate: $96.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE AND MODIFICATION PROGRAM ASSI GNED TO JSC,DFRC, AND LARC
Place of Performance
Location: HOUSTON, HARRIS County, TEXAS, 77058
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $193.7 million to PAE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC for work described as: AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE AND MODIFICATION PROGRAM ASSI GNED TO JSC,DFRC, AND LARC Key points: 1. Contract value of $193.6 million over its life. 2. PAE Applied Technologies secured the contract through full and open competition. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, indicating performance incentives. 4. This contract falls under 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The Cost Plus Award Fee structure suggests a focus on performance and value. Benchmarking against similar aircraft maintenance contracts would be necessary for a precise assessment, but the contract type implies an effort to align costs with achieved performance.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government. The competitive process allows multiple vendors to bid, driving efficiency and innovation.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing services at a reasonable cost.
Public Impact
Supports critical NASA aircraft maintenance and modification operations. Ensures continued operational readiness for NASA's aviation assets. Impacts personnel and resources at JSC, DFRC, and LARC facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration is significant (over 5 years).
- Cost Plus Award Fee can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition.
- Award fee structure incentivizes performance.
Sector Analysis
This contract is within the aerospace support services sector, which is crucial for government agencies operating aircraft. Spending benchmarks in this area are highly dependent on the specific types of aircraft and services required.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as the 'sb' field is false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought as a subcontractor.
Oversight & Accountability
Standard NASA oversight mechanisms would apply to this contract, including performance reviews and financial audits, to ensure compliance and value for money.
Related Government Programs
- Other Support Activities for Air Transportation
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost growth in Cost Plus Award Fee contracts.
- Lack of small business prime awardee.
- Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical support.
Tags
other-support-activities-for-air-transpo, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, tx, definitive-contract, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $193.7 million to PAE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC. AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE AND MODIFICATION PROGRAM ASSI GNED TO JSC,DFRC, AND LARC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PAE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $193.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-03-01. End: 2009-08-31.
What was the total award fee paid out under this contract, and how did it correlate with performance metrics?
The total award fee paid would be a critical metric to assess the effectiveness of the Cost Plus Award Fee structure. Analyzing the relationship between performance metrics and the awarded fees would reveal whether the incentives successfully drove desired outcomes and provided good value for the taxpayer. Without this specific data, the 'good' rating for value is based on the competitive nature and contract type.
Were there any significant cost overruns or performance issues reported during the contract's lifecycle?
Investigating any reported cost overruns or performance issues is essential for a comprehensive risk assessment. While the contract was awarded competitively, the Cost Plus Award Fee structure necessitates vigilant oversight to prevent excessive spending and ensure mission objectives are met. Any documented problems would necessitate a review of the oversight and management processes.
How did the final cost compare to initial projections or bids from other competitors?
Comparing the final cost against initial projections and the bids of unsuccessful competitors provides insight into the contract's overall cost-effectiveness. A thorough analysis would determine if the competitive process yielded the expected savings and if the final price represented fair market value for the services rendered. This comparison is key to understanding the true taxpayer impact.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Support Activities for Air Transportation › Other Support Activities for Air Transportation
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 9-BL54-03-05P
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)
Address: 6500 W FRWY STE 400, FORT WORTH, TX, 76116
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $269,057,914
Exercised Options: $248,851,948
Current Obligation: $193,653,857
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-03-01
Current End Date: 2009-08-31
Potential End Date: 2009-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-02-27
More Contracts from PAE Applied Technologies LLC
- TAS::97 4930::TAS — $911.3M (Department of Defense)
- Facilities Support Services TAS::80 0130::TAS — $819.1M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Other Target Cost - Aircraft Maintenance — $528.4M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $494.9M (Department of Defense)
- Awarding and Adding Funding to the Contract — $425.6M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →