NASA's $156M EOSDIS EED Contract Awarded to Raytheon for System Improvement
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $155,997,550 ($156.0M)
Contractor: Raytheon Company
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2010-04-01
End Date: 2015-09-30
Contract Duration: 2,008 days
Daily Burn Rate: $77.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: EOSDIS EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT (EED) CONTRACT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS CONTRACT, THE EED CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO COORDINATE AND INTEGRATE TASK RELATED ACTIVITIES WITH THE ESDIS PROJECT, THE DISTRIBUTED ACTIVE ARCHIVE CENTERS (DAACS), OTHER EARTH SCIENCE DATA CENTERS, THE SCIENCE INVESTIGATOR TEAMS, THE USER COMMUNITY, AS WELL AS OTHER EOS CONTRACTORS. THE CONTRACTOR S OVERALL GOAL SHALL BE TO CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVE THE RELIABILITY, AVAILABILITY, FUNCTIONALITY, OPERABILITY, AND PERFORMANCE OF HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS WITHIN THE EOSDIS WHILE REDUCING OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE COSTS.
Place of Performance
Location: RIVERDALE, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20737
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $156.0 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: EOSDIS EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT (EED) CONTRACT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS CONTRACT, THE EED CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO COORDINATE AND INTEGRATE TASK RELATED ACTIVITIES WITH THE ESDIS PROJECT, THE DISTRIBUTED ACTIVE ARCHIVE CENTERS (DAACS), OTHER EARTH SCIENCE DATA CENTERS, THE SC… Key points: 1. Contract focused on improving reliability, availability, and functionality of Earth science data systems. 2. Raytheon Company, a major defense contractor, secured this award. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract falls under Computer Systems Design Services, a significant IT sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF), which can incentivize performance but also carries risk of cost overruns if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar IT service contracts is difficult without more granular cost data.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating multiple bidders likely participated. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used to improve critical Earth science data infrastructure, aiming for long-term cost reduction and enhanced data accessibility.
Public Impact
Enhances the reliability and accessibility of vital Earth science data for researchers and the public. Supports the continuous improvement of hardware and software systems, ensuring data integrity. Aims to reduce operational and maintenance costs for NASA's Earth science data processing. Facilitates better coordination between various data centers, science teams, and user communities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee contracts can lead to higher costs if performance incentives are not well-defined or managed.
- Potential for scope creep in a contract focused on continuous improvement.
- Reliance on a single large contractor for critical system maintenance and development.
Positive Signals
- Focus on improving system reliability and reducing operational costs.
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Clear objectives for enhancing functionality and operability of essential data systems.
Sector Analysis
This contract is within the IT sector, specifically Computer Systems Design Services. Spending in this area is substantial across government agencies for maintaining and upgrading complex IT infrastructures.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the primary awardee is Raytheon Company, a large business. There is no explicit mention of small business participation or subcontracting goals within the provided details.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract requires coordination with multiple entities, including DAACs and science teams, suggesting a need for robust oversight to ensure integration and performance. The CPAF structure implies performance monitoring.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Systems Design Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure may lead to higher costs.
- Potential for scope creep in continuous improvement efforts.
- Lack of explicit small business participation details.
- Dependence on a single large contractor for critical infrastructure.
Tags
computer-systems-design-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, md, definitive-contract, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $156.0 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. EOSDIS EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT (EED) CONTRACT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS CONTRACT, THE EED CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO COORDINATE AND INTEGRATE TASK RELATED ACTIVITIES WITH THE ESDIS PROJECT, THE DISTRIBUTED ACTIVE ARCHIVE CENTERS (DAACS), OTHER EARTH SCIENCE DATA CENTERS, THE SCIENCE INVESTIGATOR TEAMS, THE USER COMMUNITY, AS WELL AS OTHER EOS CONTRACTORS. THE CONTRACTOR S OVERALL GOAL SHALL BE TO CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVE THE RELIABILITY, AVAILABILITY, FUNCTIONALITY, OPERABILITY, AND PERFORMANCE OF
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $156.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-04-01. End: 2015-09-30.
What specific metrics were used to determine award fees and ensure value for money?
The provided data does not detail the specific metrics for award fees. A Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract typically includes performance objectives and metrics tied to cost, schedule, and technical performance. The effectiveness of value for money depends on how well these metrics align with NASA's goals and how rigorously they were monitored and enforced.
How does the continuous improvement mandate impact long-term cost control and risk management?
The mandate for continuous improvement aims to proactively address system degradation and enhance efficiency, potentially reducing long-term operational costs and mitigating risks associated with outdated technology. However, it also introduces a risk of escalating costs if not tightly managed, requiring clear scope definition and performance monitoring to ensure improvements are cost-effective.
What is the potential impact of this contract on the broader Earth science data ecosystem?
This contract is crucial for maintaining and enhancing the infrastructure that supports Earth science data. By improving reliability, availability, and functionality, it ensures that scientists and the public have consistent access to critical data, fostering research and informed decision-making. It also facilitates better integration across different data centers and user groups.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: RTX Corp
Address: 5700 RIVERTECH CT, RIVERDALE, MD, 20737
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $157,470,070
Exercised Options: $157,470,070
Current Obligation: $155,997,550
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-04-01
Current End Date: 2015-09-30
Potential End Date: 2015-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-09-28
More Contracts from Raytheon Company
- Federal Contract — $5.7B (Department of Defense)
- TEN Fire Units for Qatar — $5.6B (Department of Defense)
- GPS Advanced Control Segment (OCX) Phase B Blocks 1 and 2 — $4.5B (Department of Defense)
- An/Spy-6(v) Hardware Production — $3.3B (Department of Defense)
- Predominant - Patriot UAE — $3.0B (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →