NASA awards $12.9M for Network Engineering Services to General Dynamics IT
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,927,592 ($12.9M)
Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2007-06-01
End Date: 2010-01-31
Contract Duration: 975 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.3K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: TAS::80 0120::TAS NETWORK ENGINEERING SERVICES: SUSTAINING ENGINEERING OF NETWORK COMPONENTS, NETWORK SECURITY ENGINEERING, AND NETWORK FACILITY ENGINEERING. THE SOW REQUIREMENTS ALSO FOCUS ON THE APPLICATION AND CUSTOMIZATION OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES TO MEET CURRENT AND FUTURE NETWORKING REQUIREMENTS, AND THE NECESSARY INTEGRATION REQUIRED TO DEPLOY NEW TECHNOLOGIES INTO THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT.
Place of Performance
Location: GREENBELT, PRINCE GEORGES County, MARYLAND, 20771
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $12.9 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC for work described as: TAS::80 0120::TAS NETWORK ENGINEERING SERVICES: SUSTAINING ENGINEERING OF NETWORK COMPONENTS, NETWORK SECURITY ENGINEERING, AND NETWORK FACILITY ENGINEERING. THE SOW REQUIREMENTS ALSO FOCUS ON THE APPLICATION AND CUSTOMIZATION OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES TO MEET CURRENT AND FUTURE… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on sustaining, security, and facility engineering for network components. 2. Emphasizes application of emerging technologies and integration into existing environments. 3. Awarded as a competitive delivery order by NASA. 4. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. is the contractor.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $12.9M over approximately 3 years appears reasonable for complex network engineering services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT service contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors likely had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and value for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers are likely receiving fair value for the services rendered.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operation and security of critical NASA network infrastructure. Supports the integration of new technologies to enhance NASA's networking capabilities. Contributes to the modernization of government IT systems.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Positive Signals
- Competitive award
- Focus on emerging technologies
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Computer Systems Design Services sector, a critical area for government IT infrastructure. Spending in this sector is substantial, and effective network engineering is vital for agency operations.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought through subcontracting opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
As a competitive delivery order, it implies a structured procurement process. NASA's oversight mechanisms would be crucial to ensure performance and cost control throughout the contract duration.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Systems Design Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract duration is relatively long (975 days).
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- No specific small business participation noted.
Tags
computer-systems-design-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $12.9 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. TAS::80 0120::TAS NETWORK ENGINEERING SERVICES: SUSTAINING ENGINEERING OF NETWORK COMPONENTS, NETWORK SECURITY ENGINEERING, AND NETWORK FACILITY ENGINEERING. THE SOW REQUIREMENTS ALSO FOCUS ON THE APPLICATION AND CUSTOMIZATION OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES TO MEET CURRENT AND FUTURE NETWORKING REQUIREMENTS, AND THE NECESSARY INTEGRATION REQUIRED TO DEPLOY NEW TECHNOLOGIES INTO THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-06-01. End: 2010-01-31.
What specific metrics are used to evaluate the success of network security engineering under this contract?
Success in network security engineering is typically measured by metrics such as the number of vulnerabilities identified and remediated, the effectiveness of intrusion detection and prevention systems, compliance with security standards (e.g., NIST), and the reduction in security incidents. The contract's Statement of Work (SOW) would detail these specific performance standards and reporting requirements.
How does the application of emerging technologies align with NASA's long-term strategic goals for its network infrastructure?
The integration of emerging technologies is crucial for NASA to maintain a cutting-edge, secure, and scalable network. This alignment ensures that NASA's infrastructure can support future missions, data-intensive research, and advanced communication needs. The contractor's ability to identify and implement relevant innovations directly supports NASA's strategic objectives for technological advancement and operational efficiency.
What is the potential risk associated with integrating new technologies into an existing network environment?
Integrating new technologies carries risks such as compatibility issues, increased complexity, potential security vulnerabilities, and disruption to existing services. Successful integration requires thorough planning, testing, and skilled personnel. The contract's focus on 'necessary integration' suggests these risks are being actively managed, but ongoing monitoring and robust change management processes are essential.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Csra LLC
Address: 15245 SHADY GROVE RD STE 200, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20850
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,997,366
Exercised Options: $13,997,366
Current Obligation: $12,927,592
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00T99ALD0203
IDV Type: GWAC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-06-01
Current End Date: 2010-01-31
Potential End Date: 2010-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-06-22
More Contracts from General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc
- Global Security Engineering&supply Chain Services — $1.5B (Department of State)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Establish a NEW Contract With General Dynamics Information Technology for Global Supply Chain Management, Logistics and Technology Development Services to Support the Department of State. the Initial Funding Associated With This Contract IS $22,304,578.00. the Overall Contract Value IS $2,200,000,000.00 — $1.2B (Department of State)
- Cloud Products&tools (CPT) — $902.0M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Beneficiary Contact Center Operations — $879.1M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Award of Task Order 47qfca210051-Nawcad Wolf Ship and AIR C5isr Systems Support — $832.3M (General Services Administration)
View all General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →