NASA's $55M Desktop Outsourcing Contract with Lockheed Martin Faced Full Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $55,056,314 ($55.1M)
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2007-01-31
End Date: 2011-10-31
Contract Duration: 1,734 days
Daily Burn Rate: $31.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 9
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: COMPREHENSIVE DESKTOP COMPUTER SERVICES UNDER THE OUTSOURCING DESKTOP INITIATIVE FOR NASA
Place of Performance
Location: GREENBELT, PRINCE GEORGE'S County, MARYLAND, 20771
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $55.1 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION for work described as: COMPREHENSIVE DESKTOP COMPUTER SERVICES UNDER THE OUTSOURCING DESKTOP INITIATIVE FOR NASA Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $55.06 million, was awarded to Lockheed Martin Corporation. 2. It was procured under a full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration was 1734 days, ending in October 2011. 4. The primary sector is IT services, specifically Computer Systems Design Services. 5. The contract was awarded as 'Other Direct Costs' (ODC) with a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) structure.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's value of $55.06 million over nearly 5 years for comprehensive desktop services suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT outsourcing contracts is difficult without more granular cost data, but the scale implies substantial resource allocation.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The existence of multiple bidders likely drove price discovery and innovation.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests taxpayers likely benefited from a fair market price for the services rendered.
Public Impact
Ensured consistent and reliable desktop computing services for NASA personnel. Supported critical agency operations through outsourced IT infrastructure management. The competitive award process aimed to maximize value for taxpayer dollars. The contract's duration provided long-term IT support stability.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics or quality data.
- Potential for cost overruns if not managed tightly, despite FFP.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical IT infrastructure.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Firm Fixed Price contract structure.
- Long-term duration provided stability.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT sector, specifically Computer Systems Design Services. Spending in this area is crucial for government agencies to maintain modern and efficient technological operations. Benchmarks for similar large-scale IT outsourcing contracts vary widely based on scope and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as the 'ss' field is false. The primary contractor, Lockheed Martin, is a large corporation, suggesting no direct benefit to small businesses through this specific award.
Oversight & Accountability
While the data shows the agency and awarding office, it lacks specific details on oversight mechanisms, performance reviews, or accountability measures implemented during the contract's lifecycle. Further investigation into NASA's contract management practices would be needed.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Systems Design Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics.
- Potential for vendor lock-in.
- Limited visibility into specific cost breakdowns.
- Contract duration could lead to technology obsolescence if not managed proactively.
Tags
computer-systems-design-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, md, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $55.1 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. COMPREHENSIVE DESKTOP COMPUTER SERVICES UNDER THE OUTSOURCING DESKTOP INITIATIVE FOR NASA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $55.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-01-31. End: 2011-10-31.
What was the specific scope of 'Comprehensive Desktop Computer Services' and how did it align with NASA's operational needs?
The scope likely encompassed hardware procurement, maintenance, software installation, user support, and network integration for NASA's desktop computing environment. This would include managing workstations, peripherals, and potentially mobile devices to ensure seamless operation of agency-wide IT systems and support for personnel in their daily tasks.
How did the firm fixed price structure impact the contractor's ability to manage costs and deliver services effectively within the $55M budget?
A firm fixed price contract places the cost risk on the contractor. Lockheed Martin would have been incentivized to manage its expenses tightly to maintain profitability. However, it could also lead to potential compromises in service quality or scope creep if not carefully monitored by NASA to ensure all requirements were met within budget.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the success of this outsourcing initiative and Lockheed Martin's performance?
Specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, for such contracts, KPIs might include system uptime, help desk response times, incident resolution rates, user satisfaction surveys, and adherence to security protocols. NASA would have likely monitored these metrics to ensure service delivery met contractual obligations and operational requirements.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 9
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)
Address: 700 N FREDERICK AVE LOC B, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Federally Funded Research and Development Corp, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $55,680,895
Exercised Options: $55,680,895
Current Obligation: $55,056,314
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NAS598145
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-01-31
Current End Date: 2011-10-31
Potential End Date: 2011-10-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-06-14
More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Modification IS to Award F-35A Lrip 15 Usaf Aircraft* Long Lead Funding — $30.1B (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Award Long Lead Funding for F-35A, F-35B, and F-35C Aircraft for U.S. Services, Non-Dod Partners, and FMS Customers — $24.5B (Department of Defense)
- Lrip 11 AAC — $12.3B (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →