NASA's IBEX mission contract awarded to Southwest Research Institute for over $116 million, spanning over a decade
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $116,070,724 ($116.1M)
Contractor: Southwest Research Institute
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2005-05-17
End Date: 2016-11-30
Contract Duration: 4,215 days
Daily Burn Rate: $27.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: TAS::80 0120::TAS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDUCT OF ALL PHASES AND ASPECTS OF THE IBEX MISSION INCLUDING: 1) LIFE-CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT; 2) DESIGN, TEST, DEVELOPMENT, AND OPERATIONS (PAYLOAD, SPACECRAFT, LAUNCH VEHICLE, SPACECRAFT TO LAUNCH-VEHICLE INTERFACES, LAUNCH AND FLIGHT OPERATIONS); AND 3) POST-OPERATIONS DATA ANALYSIS AND ARCHIVING. IN PERFORMANCE OF THIS EFFORT, THE IBEX TEAM SHALL: A. MANAGE THE PROJECT, PROVIDE COST AND SCHEDULE INFORMATION TO NASA AS SPECIFIED IN 3.0 MANAGEMENT, ABOVE. B. PROVIDE DAY-TO-DAY MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION OF THE PROJECT AS DELEGATED BY THE PI TO THE PROJECT MANAGER (PM), INCLUDING MONITORING AND REPORTING TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND FINANCIAL STATUS, IMPLEMENTING THE RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN AND CONDUCTING MISSION LEVEL REVIEWS AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 4.3, SYSTEM LEVEL REVIEWS. C. CONDUCT REVIEWS FOR ALL PAYLOAD SENSORS, PAYLOAD SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE AND ASSOCIATED GSE. D. PERFORM SCIENTIFIC ANALYSES IN SUPPORT OF THE MISSION SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS. E. PERFORM SYSTEMS ENGINEERING TO COORDINATE THE DESIGN OF THE INSTRUMENT COMPLEMENT AND SPACECRAFT BUS COMPONENTS; AND TO ENSURE THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE SPACE-TO-GROUND AND NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS. F. PERFORM TRADE STUDIES TO ELIMINATE AND MITIGATE RISKS G. DELIVER THE IBEX FLIGHT SEGMENT TO VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE (VAFB), SUPPORT INTEGRATION WITH THE LAUNCH VEHICLE, AND ASSIST THE LAUNCH OPERATIONS; H. ESTABLISH THE MISSION CONTROL CENTER (MCC) AND IBEX SCIENCE OPERATIONS AND DATA ANALYSIS CENTER (ISOC) INCLUDING ALL COMPUTERS, NETWORKS, AND OPERATING SOFTWARE, INSTRUMENT DATABASES AND PROCEDURES NECESSARY TO FUNCTIONALLY TEST AND LATER CONTROL THE SPACECRAFT; I. HOLD SCIENCE TEAM MEETINGS AS WELL AS TECHNICAL INTERCHANGE MEETINGS. J. BASELINE THE SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS AND SCIENCE ANALYSIS PLAN INTO AN IBEX MISSION DEFINITION REQUIREMENTS AGREEMENT (MDRA) AND THE IBEX DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN. K. IMPLEMENT AN APPROVED MISSION ASSURANCE PLAN. L. IMPLEMENT A SYSTEMS ENGINEERING FUNCTION TO VERIFY PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION COMPLIANCE TO THE MISSION SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS. M. DESIGN, FABRICATE, INTEGRATE AND TEST THE PAYLOAD, SPACECRAFT, SOLID ROCKET MOTOR AND LAUNCH VEHICLE ADAPTER, AND INTEGRATE THE IBEX FLIGHT SEGMENT WITH THE LAUNCH VEHICLE. N. IMPLEMENT A SAFETY PROGRAM INCLUDING THE GENERATION OF THE MISSILE SYSTEM PRE-LAUNCH SAFETY PACKAGE (MSPSP). O. SUPPORT LAUNCH, PERFORM ON-ORBIT CHECKOUT, AND ESTABLISH ON-ORBIT DATA ACQUISITION CONTACT WITH THE PAYLOAD. WITHIN THE FIRST 30 DAYS AFTER LAUNCH, INITIAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE CHECKOUT AND VERIFICATION OF SPACECRAFT IN-FLIGHT OPERATION WILL BE PERFORMED. P. PROVIDE THE SERVICES OF THE MCC AND THE ISOC. Q. CONDUCT THE E/PO PROGRAM IN COOPERATION WITH THE IDENTIFIED TEAM MEMBERS.
Place of Performance
Location: SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78238
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $116.1 million to SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE for work described as: TAS::80 0120::TAS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDUCT OF ALL PHASES AND ASPECTS OF THE IBEX MISSION INCLUDING: 1) LIFE-CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT; 2) DESIGN, TEST, DEVELOPMENT, AND OPERATIONS (PAYLOAD, SPACECRAFT, LAUNCH VEHICLE, SPACECRAFT TO LAUNCH-VEHICLE INTERFA… Key points: 1. Contract provides comprehensive lifecycle project management for the IBEX mission, including design, development, testing, and operations. 2. The award to Southwest Research Institute signifies a significant investment in space exploration and scientific research. 3. Performance period of over 11 years indicates a long-term commitment to the IBEX mission's objectives. 4. The contract's cost-plus-fixed-fee structure incentivizes efficient project completion while managing costs. 5. The scope includes payload, spacecraft, launch vehicle integration, and post-operations data analysis, highlighting the complexity of the mission.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $116,070,724 for a definitive contract spanning over 11 years appears reasonable given the extensive scope of work. This includes lifecycle project management, design, testing, development, operations, and data analysis for a space mission. Benchmarking against similar complex NASA missions would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment, but the duration and breadth of services suggest a substantial undertaking.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This competitive process is expected to yield a fair price and ensure the selection of a capable contractor. The presence of three bidders (no=3) suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this significant space mission contract.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces and ensuring that the most qualified and cost-effective contractor is selected.
Public Impact
The IBEX mission, managed under this contract, aims to expand our understanding of the heliosphere and its interaction with the interstellar medium. Scientific data generated from the mission will benefit researchers and the public by providing insights into space physics and astrophysics. The contract supports highly skilled personnel in aerospace engineering, project management, and scientific research. The successful execution of the IBEX mission contributes to NASA's broader goals of space exploration and scientific discovery.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in long-term, complex space missions if not rigorously managed.
- Reliance on a single contractor for all phases of the mission could pose risks if performance issues arise.
- Schedule delays are common in space projects due to technical challenges and external factors.
Positive Signals
- Award to a single, experienced contractor for the entire mission lifecycle can ensure continuity and integrated management.
- The long contract duration suggests a stable and predictable environment for the contractor to execute the mission.
- Full and open competition indicates a thorough vetting process for contractor capability and cost-effectiveness.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on space exploration and scientific instrumentation. The market for such complex, long-term space missions is specialized, involving a limited number of highly capable contractors. NASA's spending in this area is critical for advancing scientific knowledge and technological capabilities, with comparable contracts often involving significant multi-year commitments and substantial budgets for research, development, and operations.
Small Business Impact
The contract does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions. Given the specialized nature and scale of the IBEX mission, it is likely that the prime contractor, Southwest Research Institute, would engage subcontractors for specific components or services. Analysis of subcontracting plans would be necessary to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). NASA employs various oversight mechanisms, including regular progress reports, milestone reviews, and financial audits, to ensure contractor performance and adherence to contract terms. The Inspector General's office may also conduct audits and investigations to ensure accountability and prevent fraud, waste, and abuse.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Science Mission Directorate
- Heliophysics Research Programs
- Space Science Missions
- Aerospace Engineering Services
- Project Management for Complex Systems
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may increase risk of cost escalation.
- Sole-source provider for all mission phases could pose performance risks if issues arise.
Tags
nasa, space-exploration, heliophysics, definitive-contract, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, southwest-research-institute, texas, science-research, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $116.1 million to SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE. TAS::80 0120::TAS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDUCT OF ALL PHASES AND ASPECTS OF THE IBEX MISSION INCLUDING: 1) LIFE-CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT; 2) DESIGN, TEST, DEVELOPMENT, AND OPERATIONS (PAYLOAD, SPACECRAFT, LAUNCH VEHICLE, SPACECRAFT TO LAUNCH-VEHICLE INTERFACES, LAUNCH AND FLIGHT OPERATIONS); AND 3) POST-OPERATIONS DATA ANALYSIS AND ARCHIVING. IN PERFORMANCE OF THIS EFFORT, THE IBEX TEAM SHALL: A. MANAGE THE PROJECT, PROVIDE COST AND SCHEDULE INFORMATION TO NASA AS SPECIFIE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $116.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-05-17. End: 2016-11-30.
What is the historical spending pattern for the IBEX mission under this contract?
The provided data indicates a total award of $116,070,724 for the IBEX mission contract. The contract duration is from May 17, 2005, to November 30, 2016, spanning approximately 11.5 years. While the total award amount is given, specific annual or phased spending data is not detailed in this summary. To understand the spending pattern, one would need to examine NASA's financial reports or contract performance reports that break down expenditures over the contract's lifecycle. This would reveal how funds were allocated across different phases (design, development, operations) and potentially identify periods of higher or lower expenditure.
How does the cost of the IBEX mission compare to similar NASA space science missions?
Benchmarking the cost of the IBEX mission requires comparison with other NASA space science missions of similar scope, complexity, and duration. IBEX is a relatively small, focused mission studying the heliosphere. Missions like the James Webb Space Telescope or the Mars Science Laboratory represent significantly larger investments due to their more complex instrumentation, longer development cycles, and broader scientific objectives. However, comparing IBEX to other heliophysics missions, such as the Parker Solar Probe or STEREO, would offer a more direct cost-effectiveness assessment. Without specific comparative data on similar missions' total costs and scientific return, a definitive value-for-money judgment is challenging, but the $116 million figure for an 11-year mission appears within a reasonable range for its scientific objectives.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for the IBEX mission contract?
The contract details emphasize the contractor's responsibility for 'life-cycle project management; design, test, development, and operations (payload, spacecraft, launch vehicle, spacecraft to launch-vehicle interfaces, launch and flight operations); and post-operations data analysis and archiving.' Key performance indicators would likely revolve around meeting mission objectives, scientific data acquisition and quality, adherence to budget, schedule milestones, and operational reliability. Specific KPIs might include the successful deployment and operation of the spacecraft, the quality and quantity of scientific data returned, the accuracy of scientific findings related to the heliosphere, and maintaining operational status within allocated resources. NASA's oversight would track these against predefined targets.
What is Southwest Research Institute's track record with NASA on similar large-scale space missions?
Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) has a well-established track record with NASA and other space agencies, often serving as a prime contractor or key instrument provider for numerous space science missions. They have been involved in projects ranging from planetary science to heliophysics. For instance, SwRI has played significant roles in missions like New Horizons (Pluto flyby), Juno (Jupiter orbiter), and the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Their extensive experience in spacecraft design, instrument development, and mission operations suggests a strong capability to manage complex projects like IBEX. The successful execution of this IBEX contract further solidifies their reputation as a reliable partner for NASA's ambitious scientific endeavors.
What are the potential risks associated with the long duration of the IBEX mission contract?
The long duration (over 11 years) of the IBEX mission contract presents several potential risks. Firstly, technological obsolescence could become a factor, although less critical for an operational mission than for development. More significantly, there's a risk of cost escalation over time due to inflation, unforeseen technical challenges requiring extended support, or changes in program priorities within NASA. Personnel continuity can also be a challenge, with key individuals potentially leaving the project over such an extended period, leading to knowledge loss. Furthermore, the long operational phase requires sustained funding commitments from NASA, making the project vulnerable to future budget fluctuations or shifts in scientific focus. Managing these risks requires robust contract management, proactive problem-solving, and consistent stakeholder engagement.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Navigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments Manufacturing › Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Space R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 6220 CULEBRA RD, SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78238
Business Categories: Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $120,581,524
Exercised Options: $116,070,724
Current Obligation: $116,070,724
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-05-17
Current End Date: 2016-11-30
Potential End Date: 2016-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-02-02
More Contracts from Southwest Research Institute
- TAS::80 0120::TAS AS the Principal Investigator (PI) Institution for the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Instrument Suite Science Team (isst), the Contractor IS Responsible for Leading the Solving Magnetospheric Acceleration Reconnection and Turbulence (smart) Team Through ALL Mission Phases. the Scope of Work Shall Include, BUT NOT BE Limited, to the Following: - Manage the Smart Team Through Phases B Through E of the MMS Mission, - Defining Science Goals and Objectives - Assist the MMS Project and HQ Science Mission Directorate Heliophysics Division in the Preparation of Level 1 Requirements for the MMS Mission - Flow-Down of Top-Level Mission Requirements to the Appropriate Elements of the Instrument Suite - Design, Fabrication, Integration, Calibration, Testing and Delivery of Four Fully Qualified, Flight Instrument Suites to Observatory Integration and Test (I&T) Plus Spares - Design, Development, Integration and Testing of the SOC - Support Observatory-Level I&T Activities - Provide Sustaining Engineering and I&T Support of the Instrument Suites After Delivery to Nasa - Responsibility for the On-Orbit Operation, Health and Safety of the Instrument Suites - Responsibility for Operating and Maintaining the SOC Post-Launch - Establishing and Managing Subcontracts With Instrument Suite Team Members - Establishing and Maintaining the Required International Traffic in Arms Regulations (itar) and Export Control Documentation Necessary for Working With ITS International Team Members - Implementation of an EPO Program for the MMS Mission — $383.4M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE National Aeronautics and Space Administration HAS Selected Juno NEW Frontiers Mission Under the Direction of Principal Investigator (PI) DR. Scott Bolton to Continue Development With the Expectation That the Juno Mission Will Enter Phase B in Early Fiscal Year 2006. the Juno Mission Will BE Managed by the Marshall Space Flight Center, NEW Frontiers Program Office. KEY Juno Team Members Include DR. Bolton's Home Institution, the Southwest Research Institute (swri), the Juno Implementation Team Leader JET Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and the Spacecraft BUS Provider the Lockheed Martin Space Systems Division (lm/Ss). the PI'S Team AT Swri Needs to Begin Work on a Subset of Phase B Activities AS Early in FY06 AS Possible. This SOW Provides a List of Activities That ARE Necessary to Begin Work in FY06 and Their Associated Deliverables. the Juno Mission IS a Collaboration Between Southwest Research Institute (swri), JPL, Lockheed Martin (LM), and a Complementary Team of Universities and Field Centers. the Principal Investigator, DR. Scott Bolton, IS AT Southwest Research Institute (swri) and IS Responsible to Nasa for ALL Aspects of the Mission Including Achieving ALL Scientific Objectives and Mission Goals. JPL Provides the Project Manager WHO Oversees the Day-To-Day Management of the Project and Will Report to the PI. Principal Investigator (PI) DR. Scott Bolton IS Responsible to Nasa for Meeting the Scientific Objectives of the Juno Mission Within Cost and Schedule. AS PI, DR. Bolton HAS Direct Accountability to the Nasa NEW Frontiers Program Office for the Implementation of Juno. ALL Juno Science Co-Is, the Deputy PI and Project Scientist, the Science Investigation Office Manager, the E/PO Effort, the Juno Advisory Board and the PM Report Directly to DR. Bolton. the PI Delegates the Day-To-Day Management of the Project to the Project Manager (PM), Rick Grammier. the Project System Engineer, Payload Manager, Flight System Manager, Mission Manager, Science OPS Center, Business Manager, LM Contract CTM, and Mission Assurance Manager ALL Report Directly to the PM — $184.3M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- NEW Horizon -- Pluto Mission Phase B — $166.9M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Under This Contract, the Contractor Will Provide the Personnel, Materials, Equipment, and Facilities Necessary to Produce the Polarimeter to Unify the Corona Heliosphere (punch) Phase a Concept Study. the Scope of This Effort Includes, BUT IS NOT Limited TO: 1. Principal Investigator Program Office 2. Instrument System Engineering, Including Instrument Mission Assurance 3. Design of a Flight Qualified Punch Instrument Meeting Mission and Science Requirements 4. Develop Plans in Support of Integration and Test of the Punch Instrument Flight System 5. Develop Plans in Support of Essential Field Operations 6. Develop Plans in Support of Launch Operations and Flight Operations 7. Develop Plans for Lead the Punch Science Investigation AS Well AS the Generation of Resulting Data Products the Contractor Shall Provide a Briefing on the Punch Science and Science Implementation Plan AT the Phase a Site Visit. the Contractor Shall Provide an Organization Chart Defining Contractor Roles and Responsibilities, Reporting Procedures, and ALL Lines of Authority. the Contractor Shall Participate in Defining the Relationships Between the Contractor's Program Office and the Nasa Explorers Program Office. the Contractor Shall Develop a Punch Instrument Systems Requirements Document and a Punch Mission Systems Requirements Document. the Contractor Will Also Develop Detailed Block Diagrams and Technical Descriptions of ALL Instrument Systems. the Contractor Will Conduct In-Depth Instrument-Level Reviews of the Proposed Instrument Design. They Will Conduct Essential Trade Studies, Analyses, Modeling and Simulations to Assure Compliance With Instrument Requirements. the Contractor Will Lead the Science Team and Develop an Instrument-Level Test Plan and Participate in Planning for Integration and Test. the Contractor Shall Prepare a Detailed Instrument Development Schedule Covering ALL Mission Phases, Listing Major Milestones, Including a Defined Critical Path and Schedule Reserves. the Contractor Will Prepare Updated Instrument Budgets AS Well AS Review and Approve the Overall Punch Budget. Finally, the Contractor Shall Prepare and Submit the Concept Study Report — $139.2M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Lucy Payload and Science Operation Center — $74.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →