NASA awards $11.6M for Environmental & Safety Support to Leidos, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,613,191 ($11.6M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2007-12-21
End Date: 2013-03-31
Contract Duration: 1,927 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)
Sector: Other
Official Description: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY OFFICE SUPPORT (EMASS) TASK ORDER FOR THE TASK 200 SERIES - FACILITIES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44135
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $11.6 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY OFFICE SUPPORT (EMASS) TASK ORDER FOR THE TASK 200 SERIES - FACILITIES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY SUPPORT Key points: 1. Leidos, Inc. secured a significant contract for environmental and safety support services. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract was 1927 days, spanning over five years. 4. The award value of $11.6 million suggests a substantial need for these specialized services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $11.6 million over approximately five years averages to about $2.3 million annually. Without specific benchmarks for similar environmental consulting services, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing, but it appears moderate for a large federal agency like NASA.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the agency to select the best value offering.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is expected to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for essential environmental and safety support.
Public Impact
Ensures compliance with environmental regulations for NASA facilities. Supports critical safety protocols to protect personnel and the environment. Provides specialized expertise in environmental management and consulting. Contributes to the operational integrity of NASA's facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 60 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics provided.
- Potential for scope creep in long-term environmental contracts.
Positive Signals
- Awarded via full and open competition.
- Long-term contract provides stability for essential services.
Sector Analysis
The Environmental Consulting Services sector supports government agencies in managing environmental impact and ensuring safety compliance. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on regulatory changes and infrastructure needs, but is generally consistent for agencies with significant physical operations like NASA.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct analysis of small business participation or impact from this specific award.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), a federal agency with established oversight mechanisms. Further details on specific oversight activities for this task order would require access to internal NASA documentation.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Consulting Services
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract duration is substantial (over 5 years).
- No specific performance metrics are detailed.
- Small business participation is not indicated.
- Potential for long-term reliance on a single contractor.
Tags
environmental-consulting-services, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, oh, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $11.6 million to LEIDOS, INC.. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY OFFICE SUPPORT (EMASS) TASK ORDER FOR THE TASK 200 SERIES - FACILITIES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-12-21. End: 2013-03-31.
What specific environmental and safety challenges does NASA face that necessitate this level of support?
NASA facilities, particularly those involved in research, development, and launch operations, can present unique environmental and safety challenges. These may include hazardous material handling, waste management, emissions control, and ensuring worker safety in complex operational environments. The EMASS task order likely addresses a broad spectrum of these needs, from regulatory compliance to proactive risk mitigation and emergency preparedness.
How does the pricing of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar environmental consulting services?
Assessing the precise value for money requires detailed comparison with industry benchmarks for environmental consulting services, which are not readily available in the provided data. The annual average of approximately $2.3 million for NASA's needs suggests a significant scope. Without specific service details and market rates, it's challenging to definitively label the pricing as excellent or concerning, placing it in a 'fair' assessment range.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness of Leidos, Inc.'s support under this contract?
The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness of Leidos, Inc.'s support. Typically, such contracts would include metrics related to regulatory compliance rates, incident reduction, timely reporting, and successful implementation of safety protocols. Understanding these KPIs would be crucial for a comprehensive evaluation of the contract's success and taxpayer value.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (3)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 10260 CAMPUS POINT DR, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92121
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $13,012,319
Exercised Options: $13,012,319
Current Obligation: $11,613,191
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNC08BA02B
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-12-21
Current End Date: 2013-03-31
Potential End Date: 2017-08-11 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-08-14
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →