NASA's $20.4M Environmental Management Support contract awarded to Leidos, Inc. for safety and health services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,435,124 ($20.4M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2007-12-04
End Date: 2013-05-03
Contract Duration: 1,977 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)
Sector: Other
Official Description: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY OFFICE SUPPORT (EMASS) TASK ORDER FOR THE TASK 100 SERIES - SAFETY HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT DIVISION.
Place of Performance
Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44135
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $20.4 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY OFFICE SUPPORT (EMASS) TASK ORDER FOR THE TASK 100 SERIES - SAFETY HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT DIVISION. Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of approximately 5.5 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 3. The award value of $20.4 million over its period suggests a significant investment in environmental management. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541620 points to specialized environmental consulting services. 5. The contract was a delivery order under a larger contract, implying it's part of a broader framework. 6. The absence of small business set-aside flags suggests the primary contractor is not a small business, and subcontracting opportunities may vary.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this specific task order is challenging without comparable data for similar environmental management and safety support contracts at NASA. The total award of $20.4 million over nearly five and a half years averages to approximately $3.7 million annually. This figure needs to be assessed against the scope and complexity of the services provided by Leidos, Inc. to determine if it represents good value for money. Without detailed performance metrics or a breakdown of specific services rendered, a definitive value assessment is difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific task order. While full and open competition is generally favorable for price discovery, the number of bidders can influence the intensity of that competition. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process like full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs and ensuring the government receives services at a fair market price.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is NASA, which receives essential environmental management and safety support services. The services delivered likely include environmental consulting, safety assessments, health monitoring, and regulatory compliance assistance. The geographic impact is primarily centered around NASA facilities, particularly in Ohio where the contract was administered. The contract supports a workforce of environmental and safety professionals, contributing to specialized employment within the sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if the scope of work expands beyond initial estimates.
- Risk of contractor performance not meeting NASA's stringent safety and environmental standards.
- Dependency on a single contractor for critical safety and environmental functions could pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a structured and potentially cost-effective procurement process.
- Long contract duration suggests a stable and reliable provision of essential services.
- Contractor (Leidos, Inc.) is a large, established company with significant experience in government contracting, potentially indicating a lower risk of execution failure.
Sector Analysis
The environmental consulting services sector is a critical component of government operations, particularly for agencies like NASA that manage complex facilities and research activities. This contract falls under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. The market for environmental consulting is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. NASA's spending in this area is driven by regulatory requirements, operational safety needs, and environmental stewardship commitments. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within other large federal agencies with similar environmental management responsibilities.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and the 'sb' field is false. This indicates that the primary contract was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. While Leidos, Inc. is a large corporation, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors. The extent of subcontracting to small businesses would depend on Leidos's subcontracting plan and the specific requirements of the task order.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contracting officers and program managers. They are responsible for monitoring contractor performance, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and approving payments. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and public reporting mechanisms. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse arise during the contract's lifecycle.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Environmental Compliance and Monitoring
- Federal Environmental Consulting Services
- Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Compliance Support
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regulatory Support
Risk Flags
- Contract awarded under a previous indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract, potentially limiting direct comparison of competition for this specific task order.
- Task order duration is substantial, requiring careful monitoring of performance and cost over an extended period.
- Specific performance metrics and outcomes are not detailed, making a precise value-for-money assessment challenging.
Tags
nasa, environmental-consulting, safety-support, health-support, leidos-inc, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, professional-scientific-technical-services, ohio, federal-spending, government-contracting
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $20.4 million to LEIDOS, INC.. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY OFFICE SUPPORT (EMASS) TASK ORDER FOR THE TASK 100 SERIES - SAFETY HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT DIVISION.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-12-04. End: 2013-05-03.
What specific environmental management and safety services were included in this task order?
While the task order title 'ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY OFFICE SUPPORT (EMASS) TASK 100 SERIES - SAFETY HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT DIVISION' indicates the general area, the specific services are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, such contracts encompass a range of activities including environmental impact assessments, hazardous materials management, waste disposal oversight, regulatory compliance monitoring (e.g., EPA, OSHA), safety program development and implementation, industrial hygiene assessments, emergency preparedness planning, and environmental data management. The exact scope would be defined in the task order's statement of work, which is not available here. These services are crucial for NASA to maintain safe operating conditions and comply with federal environmental regulations.
How does the $20.4 million award compare to NASA's typical spending on similar environmental support contracts?
Direct comparison of this $20.4 million task order to NASA's overall spending on similar contracts is difficult without access to NASA's historical contract data and a clear definition of 'similar'. However, considering the contract duration of approximately 5.5 years (from December 2007 to May 2013), the average annual spending was around $3.7 million. This figure appears moderate for a large federal agency like NASA, which operates numerous research centers and facilities with significant environmental footprints. Larger, agency-wide environmental services contracts could easily run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars over similar periods. This specific task order likely covered a defined set of services for a particular division or facility.
What is Leidos, Inc.'s track record with NASA and in the environmental consulting sector?
Leidos, Inc. is a major government contractor with extensive experience across various sectors, including defense, intelligence, health, and civil agencies like NASA. They have a long history of providing complex technical, engineering, and scientific services. Within the environmental consulting domain, Leidos has capabilities in areas such as environmental remediation, compliance, sustainability, and safety. Their track record with NASA likely includes numerous previous contracts and task orders, given their size and scope. A deeper analysis would involve reviewing NASA's contract database for specific performance history, past performance evaluations, and any significant issues or accolades related to Leidos's work with the agency, particularly in environmental and safety support.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) likely used to evaluate the success of this contract?
Key performance indicators for this Environmental Management and Safety Office Support (EMASS) contract would likely focus on compliance, safety, and efficiency. Examples include: adherence to all federal, state, and local environmental regulations (measured by audit findings or citations), reduction in reportable safety incidents or environmental spills, timely completion of required environmental reporting and assessments, effectiveness of implemented safety protocols (e.g., reduction in workplace hazards), and successful management of hazardous materials. Client satisfaction surveys from NASA personnel and the absence of significant performance deficiencies or contract disputes would also serve as indicators of success. The contractor's ability to meet deadlines and stay within budget for defined tasks would also be critical.
Were there any significant risks identified during the procurement or execution of this contract?
The provided data does not explicitly detail identified risks. However, general risks inherent in such contracts include: scope creep leading to cost overruns, contractor failure to meet stringent environmental and safety standards, potential for unforeseen environmental liabilities, reliance on key personnel whose departure could disrupt services, and challenges in adapting to evolving regulatory requirements. Given the 'full and open competition' award, risks related to contractor capability or financial stability were likely assessed during the bidding process. NASA's contracting officers would have implemented risk mitigation strategies, such as performance bonds, clear performance standards, and regular progress reviews, to manage these potential issues throughout the contract's lifecycle.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (3)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 10260 CAMPUS POINT DR, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92121
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,709,382
Exercised Options: $23,709,382
Current Obligation: $20,435,124
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNC08BA02B
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-12-04
Current End Date: 2013-05-03
Potential End Date: 2019-09-04 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2019-09-09
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →