NASA awards $69.3M contract for computer systems design services to Lockheed Martin
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $69,347,330 ($69.3M)
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corporation
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2007-04-01
End Date: 2012-01-04
Contract Duration: 1,739 days
Daily Burn Rate: $39.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: OTHER (NONE OF THE ABOVE)
Sector: IT
Official Description: ODIN DELIVERY ORDER 3
Place of Performance
Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44135
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $69.3 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION for work described as: ODIN DELIVERY ORDER 3 Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in IT infrastructure support. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding process for this service. 3. Contract duration of nearly five years indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The award to a large, established contractor like Lockheed Martin suggests a focus on reliability and proven capability. 5. This contract falls within the broader IT services sector, supporting critical government functions. 6. Performance context is crucial to assess if the delivered services met NASA's evolving technological needs over the contract period.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific performance metrics or comparable contract data from NASA. The total award amount of $69.3 million over approximately five years suggests an average annual spend of around $13.8 million. This figure needs to be compared against the complexity and scope of the computer systems design services provided. Without details on the specific deliverables and the market rates for such specialized services during the 2007-2012 period, a definitive value-for-money assessment is difficult. However, the duration and scale imply a substantial requirement.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach is generally favored for maximizing competition and potentially achieving better pricing and quality. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation implies a robust competitive environment was intended.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to vie for the contract, which can drive down costs and improve the quality of services offered.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiary is NASA, which receives essential computer systems design and support services. The services delivered likely include the design, development, integration, and maintenance of complex computer systems critical to NASA's missions. The geographic impact is primarily within NASA's operational centers, though the specific locations are not detailed. Workforce implications could include employment opportunities for IT professionals, engineers, and support staff within Lockheed Martin and its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true value and effectiveness of the services rendered.
- The long contract duration could lead to vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.
- Potential for cost overruns if project scope changes significantly without adequate oversight.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
- Contract awarded to a large, reputable contractor with extensive experience in aerospace and defense.
- The contract duration indicates a stable, long-term need, potentially leading to efficient service delivery.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically in computer systems design services. The IT services market for government contracts is substantial, with agencies like NASA requiring sophisticated solutions for mission-critical operations. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale IT service contracts awarded by NASA and other federal agencies during the same period, focusing on contracts for system design, integration, and support.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside provision. However, as a large prime contract awarded to Lockheed Martin, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors, depending on Lockheed Martin's subcontracting plan and the specific needs of the project.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Accountability measures would be tied to the contract's performance work statement, milestones, and deliverables. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and public reporting, though detailed operational oversight specifics are typically internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- NASA IT Services Contracts
- Computer Systems Design and Integration
- Aerospace IT Support
- Federal IT Infrastructure Modernization
- Lockheed Martin Government Contracts
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration
- Lack of specific performance metrics in summary data
- Potential for scope creep in system design projects
Tags
nasa, it-services, computer-systems-design, lockheed-martin, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, large-contract, 2007-2012, federal-agency, information-technology
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $69.3 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION. ODIN DELIVERY ORDER 3
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $69.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-04-01. End: 2012-01-04.
What specific computer systems design services were provided under this contract?
While the contract is broadly categorized under 'Computer Systems Design Services' (NAICS 541512), the specific services rendered under ODIN DELIVERY ORDER 3 to NASA are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, such contracts involve the design, development, integration, testing, and maintenance of complex IT systems. This could encompass areas like software engineering, network architecture, cybersecurity solutions, data management systems, and the integration of hardware and software components to meet NASA's unique operational and scientific requirements. The exact scope would be defined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW).
How does the $69.3 million award compare to other NASA IT contracts of similar scope during the 2007-2012 period?
Comparing the $69.3 million award requires access to historical NASA contract data for the 2007-2012 timeframe, specifically for computer systems design services. Without a direct database comparison, it's difficult to definitively state if this amount was high, low, or average. However, given that Lockheed Martin is a major aerospace and defense contractor, and NASA deals with highly complex technological needs, a multi-year contract in the tens of millions of dollars for specialized IT services is not unusual. The 'full and open competition' aspect suggests that NASA sought competitive bids to ensure fair market value for this significant investment.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate Lockheed Martin's performance on this contract?
The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate Lockheed Martin's performance on ODIN DELIVERY ORDER 3. Typically, government contracts include a Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW) that outlines specific deliverables, quality standards, timelines, and performance metrics. These could include system uptime, response times for technical support, successful implementation of new system features, adherence to security protocols, and user satisfaction. NASA's contracting officers would have been responsible for monitoring these metrics and assessing Lockheed Martin's performance against them throughout the contract's duration.
What is Lockheed Martin's track record with NASA for similar IT services?
Lockheed Martin has a long-standing and extensive track record of providing a wide range of services and products to NASA, including complex IT solutions, systems engineering, and mission support. Their involvement spans numerous NASA programs and projects over several decades. Given their status as a major defense and aerospace contractor, NASA frequently engages them for critical and large-scale technology initiatives. This specific contract (ODIN DELIVERY ORDER 3) represents one of many engagements, and their overall history with NASA suggests a capability to handle sophisticated IT system design and support requirements.
Were there any identified risks or challenges associated with this contract, and how were they managed?
The provided data does not explicitly detail risks or challenges associated with this specific contract. However, common risks in large IT system design contracts include scope creep, technological obsolescence, integration issues with existing systems, cybersecurity threats, and contractor performance issues. Given the contract's duration (nearly five years) and its focus on system design, managing technological evolution and ensuring seamless integration would have been critical. NASA's oversight, including regular reviews, milestone approvals, and potentially change control processes, would have been the primary mechanisms for identifying and managing such risks.
How has NASA's spending on computer systems design services evolved since this contract was awarded?
NASA's spending on computer systems design services has likely evolved significantly since the 2007-2012 period of this contract. Post-2012, there has been a continued emphasis on cloud computing, data analytics, advanced cybersecurity measures, and the modernization of legacy systems across all federal agencies, including NASA. Spending patterns would reflect these technological shifts, potentially moving towards more agile development methodologies, increased use of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) software integrated with custom solutions, and a greater focus on data-driven decision-making. Specific spending figures would require analysis of NASA's budget appropriations and contract awards in subsequent fiscal years.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation ID: ODIN ARMD DO3
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: OTHER (NONE OF THE ABOVE) (3)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)
Address: 700 N FREDERICK AVE LOC B, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Federally Funded Research and Development Corp, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $71,794,629
Exercised Options: $71,794,629
Current Obligation: $69,347,330
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NAS598145
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-04-01
Current End Date: 2012-01-04
Potential End Date: 2012-01-04 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-09-19
More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Modification IS to Award F-35A Lrip 15 Usaf Aircraft* Long Lead Funding — $30.1B (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Award Long Lead Funding for F-35A, F-35B, and F-35C Aircraft for U.S. Services, Non-Dod Partners, and FMS Customers — $24.5B (Department of Defense)
- Lrip 11 AAC — $12.3B (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →