NASA's $10.7M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,683,990 ($10.7M)
Contractor: KBR Wyle Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2005-05-01
End Date: 2015-09-30
Contract Duration: 3,804 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: LOGISTICS
Place of Performance
Location: CLEVELAND, CUYAHOGA County, OHIO, 44135
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $10.7 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: LOGISTICS Key points: 1. Contract provides essential facilities support services, crucial for NASA's operational continuity. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. A long duration of 3804 days indicates a significant, long-term need for these services. 4. The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPA) pricing structure incentivizes performance but requires careful oversight. 5. The contract's value is moderate within the context of large federal facilities support contracts. 6. No specific small business set-aside was noted, potentially limiting direct small business participation.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $10.7 million over its 10-year duration suggests a moderate annual spend for facilities support. Benchmarking this against similar large-scale federal facilities support contracts requires detailed analysis of scope and service levels. However, the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPA) structure, while common for complex services, can lead to costs exceeding initial estimates if not managed rigorously. The pricing mechanism aims to reward high performance, but the ultimate value for money depends heavily on the achieved award fees and the efficiency of service delivery.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the competition was broad, specific sources may have been excluded based on pre-qualification or other criteria. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation generally implies a robust competitive environment. This approach is intended to ensure the government receives the best value by considering a wide range of qualified offerors, fostering price discovery and innovation.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process like this generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs and improving service quality through market forces. It ensures that public funds are used efficiently by selecting the most capable and cost-effective provider.
Public Impact
Benefits NASA by ensuring the reliable operation and maintenance of its facilities. Services delivered include a broad range of facility support functions essential for research and operations. Geographic impact is primarily focused on NASA facilities within Ohio, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include the employment of personnel for facility maintenance, operations, and management.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Award Fee contracts if performance metrics and award fee calculations are not strictly managed.
- Lack of explicit small business set-aside may limit direct subcontracting opportunities for small businesses in this specific award.
- Long contract duration could lead to vendor complacency if performance monitoring is not consistently rigorous.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that likely yielded a fair price.
- The contractor, KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC, has a significant presence and experience in government contracting, implying a level of established capability.
- The contract's focus on facilities support is critical for NASA's core mission enablement.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a significant segment of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector encompasses a wide array of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government and commercial facilities. Federal spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need to maintain aging infrastructure and support complex operational requirements across various agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be assessed based on the square footage managed, types of services provided (e.g., maintenance, janitorial, security, utilities), and geographic location.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This means that while large businesses were eligible and awarded the contract, there is no explicit requirement for a portion of the work to be subcontracted to small businesses under this specific award. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC's internal subcontracting policies and their engagement with the small business supply chain for materials and specialized services not directly performed by their own workforce.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) contracting officer and their representatives. Performance monitoring, invoicing review, and compliance checks are standard oversight mechanisms. The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPA) structure necessitates detailed performance evaluations against defined criteria to justify award fees, adding a layer of accountability. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific operational details may be sensitive.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Facilities Operations Contracts
- General Services Administration (GSA) Facilities Management Contracts
- Department of Defense Base Operations Support (BOS)
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost creep in CPA contracts.
- Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.
- Limited visibility into specific award fee criteria and evaluations.
Tags
facilities-support, nasa, kbr-wyle-services, cost-plus-award-fee, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, ohio, logistics, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $10.7 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC. LOGISTICS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-05-01. End: 2015-09-30.
What is the historical spending trend for facilities support services at NASA?
Analyzing historical spending trends for facilities support services at NASA requires access to detailed budget appropriations and contract award data over multiple fiscal years. Generally, federal agencies like NASA allocate significant portions of their budgets to maintaining and operating their extensive facilities, which include research centers, launch sites, and administrative buildings. Spending can fluctuate based on infrastructure upgrades, new construction projects, and shifts in operational requirements. Factors such as aging infrastructure necessitating more maintenance, or conversely, consolidation efforts reducing facility footprints, can influence these trends. Without specific historical data for NASA's facilities support, it's difficult to provide precise figures, but it is a consistent and substantial expenditure category for agencies with large physical assets.
How does the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPA) structure typically impact final contract costs compared to fixed-price contracts for similar services?
Cost Plus Award Fee (CPA) contracts allow the contractor to recover allowable costs plus a fee that is composed of a base fee and an award amount, determined by the government's evaluation of the contractor's performance against specific criteria. This structure is often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined or when innovation and high performance are critical. Compared to fixed-price contracts, CPA contracts carry a higher risk of cost growth for the government, as the final cost is not predetermined. However, the award fee component is designed to incentivize superior performance, potentially leading to better outcomes than might be achieved under a less flexible fixed-price arrangement. The key to value realization in CPA contracts lies in robust performance metrics and objective evaluation processes by the government.
What are the typical performance metrics used in facilities support service contracts awarded by NASA?
Performance metrics for NASA facilities support contracts are typically tailored to the specific services required but often include key performance indicators (KPIs) related to operational efficiency, safety, responsiveness, and cost control. Common metrics might involve response times for maintenance requests, uptime percentages for critical building systems (e.g., HVAC, power), adherence to safety protocols and incident rates, energy consumption efficiency, preventative maintenance completion rates, and customer satisfaction surveys from facility users. For contracts with an award fee component, these metrics are crucial for determining the level of award fee earned by the contractor, directly linking performance to financial incentives.
What is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC's track record with NASA and other federal agencies for facilities support contracts?
KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC, and its predecessor entities, have a substantial history of performing services for NASA and other federal agencies, including extensive work in logistics, engineering, and facilities management. Their track record often includes large-scale support contracts at various NASA centers and other government installations. Publicly available contract databases and agency performance reports can provide insights into their past performance ratings, any significant contract disputes, and their success in winning and executing similar complex service agreements. Generally, companies with long-standing government contracts demonstrate a capacity to meet federal requirements, though specific performance on any given contract can vary.
How does the geographic location of the contractor (Ohio) influence the delivery and cost of services for NASA facilities?
The geographic location of the contractor, KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC, being based in Ohio, can influence service delivery and costs depending on the location of the NASA facilities they are contracted to support. If the primary NASA facilities are also located in Ohio, this proximity can lead to reduced travel time, potentially lower logistical costs, and faster response times for on-site services. However, if the NASA facilities are geographically dispersed or located far from the contractor's base, the costs associated with travel, accommodation, and managing a distributed workforce could increase. The contract's scope and specific service level agreements would dictate the extent of this influence.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 7701 GREENBELT RD STE 400, GREENBELT, MD, 20770
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,524,229
Exercised Options: $11,524,229
Current Obligation: $10,683,990
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNC05CB17C
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-05-01
Current End Date: 2015-09-30
Potential End Date: 2015-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-02-08
More Contracts from KBR Wyle Services, LLC
- Bioastronautics Contract-Activities for the Health &productivity of Crews Working and Living in Space — $1.5B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Fpds-Ng Mission Systems Operations Contract (msoc) — $1.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Acquire Engineering Services and Related Services to MSD and Related Organizations Throughout Gsfc, AS Required, for the Formulation, Design, Development, Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. the Engineering Areas of Emphasis ARE Multidisciplinary With Concentration in the Mechanical Engineering Areas of Materials, Structural Analysis and Loads, Mechanical Design, Electromechanical Design, Thermal, Contamination and Coatings, Manufacturing and Integration and Test — $728.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200106!000121!1700!F7004 !marine Corps Logistics Base !M6700499C0002 !a!n!*!n!p00015 !20010228!20080930!041014242!041014242!139691877!n!honeywell Technology Solutions!7000 Columbia Gateway Driv!columbia !md!21046!35000!031!12!jacksonville !duval !florida !+000004292865!n!n!000000000000!j049!maint & Repair of Eq/Maintenance & Repair Shop EQ !a4a!combat Vehicles !2000!NOT Discernable or Classified !811310!*!*!3! ! !C!*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !N!J!2!006!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $670.1M (Department of Defense)
- Mission Operations Management Services (moms) — $623.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →