NASA's $222.5M Facilities Maintenance Contract Awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc. for 10 Years
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $222,527,200 ($222.5M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2015-10-13
End Date: 2026-04-12
Contract Duration: 3,834 days
Daily Burn Rate: $58.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES CONTRACT THE NASA AMES FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (AFSS) CONTRACT WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION, AND EXECUTION OF A COMPREHENSIVE RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM) PROGRAM FOR ARC COVERING THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL AREAS: ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, PIPEFITTING, INFRASTRUCTURE UTILITY SERVICES HEATING, VENTILATING, AIR CONDITIONING, AND REFRIGERATION (HVAC/R) SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING, GROUNDS MAINTENANCE, AND BUILDING TRADE SERVICES. THE CENTRAL FOCUS OF THE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM WILL BE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RCM STRATEGIES TO DETERMINE THE OPTIMUM MIX OF PREVENTIVE, PROGRAMMED, PREDICTIVE, REACTIVE, AND PROACTIVE MAINTENANCE PRACTICES IN AN EFFORT TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES. THE FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES PROCURED THROUGH THIS EFFORT WILL PERFORM MAINTENANCE FOR ALL FACILITIES AT ARC, EXCEPT FOR NON-INFRASTRUCTURE RELATED SYSTEMS INSIDE WIND TUNNELS.
Place of Performance
Location: MOFFETT FIELD, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94035
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $222.5 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES CONTRACT THE NASA AMES FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (AFSS) CONTRACT WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION, AND EXECUTION OF A COMPREHENSIVE RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM) PROGRA… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on implementing a Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) program across various facility systems. 2. The RCM approach aims to optimize maintenance practices for efficiency and effectiveness. 3. Services include electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC/R, environmental, and grounds maintenance. 4. The contract spans a significant duration, indicating a long-term need for facility upkeep. 5. Amentum Technology, Inc. is the sole awardee, suggesting a competitive selection process. 6. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, providing cost certainty for NASA. 7. This contract supports critical infrastructure at NASA Ames Research Center. 8. The scope covers a broad range of technical areas essential for facility operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $222.5 million over approximately 10 years for comprehensive facilities maintenance at a major research center appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities support contracts for federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests a degree of cost control, but the long duration necessitates careful monitoring of performance and potential scope creep to ensure continued value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of 8 bids suggests a healthy level of competition for this significant facilities support services contract. This competitive environment is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive offers.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process for a contract of this magnitude helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through competitive bidding.
Public Impact
Supports the operational continuity of NASA Ames Research Center, a key hub for scientific research and development. Ensures the safety and functionality of critical infrastructure, including laboratories, offices, and testing facilities. Maintains grounds and environmental services, contributing to a safe and productive work environment for NASA personnel. The contract likely supports a workforce involved in specialized maintenance and facility management services. Geographic impact is concentrated at NASA Ames Research Center in California.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long-term nature of the contract could lead to complacency if not actively managed.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance poses a risk if performance degrades.
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen maintenance issues arise beyond the scope of RCM predictions.
- Ensuring consistent quality of services across all technical areas over the contract duration.
Positive Signals
- Implementation of a Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) program suggests a proactive approach to facility upkeep.
- Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the duration of the award.
- Full and open competition indicates a robust selection process likely yielding a qualified contractor.
- The contract duration allows for long-term planning and investment in maintenance strategies.
- Award to Amentum Technology, Inc. suggests they possess the necessary expertise for complex facility management.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a critical component of government operations. This sector encompasses a wide range of services necessary to maintain government buildings and infrastructure. The market for these services is substantial, with numerous private sector companies specializing in facility management, maintenance, and repair. This specific contract is significant due to its scale and the specialized nature of implementing an RCM program for a high-tech research facility like NASA Ames.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While there is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses, large federal contracts often include provisions for small business participation. The absence of a set-aside suggests that the primary award was made to a large business capable of handling the comprehensive scope of services. Further review of the contract details would be needed to ascertain specific small business subcontracting goals or achievements.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration team at NASA Ames Research Center. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and adherence to contract terms are key oversight functions. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability for the contractor to deliver services within the agreed-upon budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting, though specific performance metrics may not always be publicly disclosed.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Federal Facilities Support Services
- Reliability Centered Maintenance Programs
- Government Infrastructure Management
- Research Center Operations Support
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may increase risk of performance degradation.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure.
- Potential for unforeseen maintenance issues impacting fixed price.
- Ensuring consistent service quality over a decade.
Tags
facilities-support-services, nasa, amentum-technology-inc, california, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, definitive-contract, large-contract, reliability-centered-maintenance, infrastructure-maintenance
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $222.5 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES CONTRACT THE NASA AMES FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (AFSS) CONTRACT WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION, AND EXECUTION OF A COMPREHENSIVE RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE (RCM) PROGRAM FOR ARC COVERING THE FOLLOWING TECHNICAL AREAS: ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, PIPEFITTING, INFRASTRUCTURE UTILITY SERVICES HEATING, VENTILATING, AIR CONDITIONING, AND REFRIGERATION (HVAC/R) SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $222.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2015-10-13. End: 2026-04-12.
What is the historical spending pattern for facilities maintenance at NASA Ames Research Center prior to this contract?
Historical spending data for facilities maintenance at NASA Ames Research Center prior to this contract (awarded in 2015, effective 2015-2026) would provide crucial context for evaluating the $222.5 million award. Analyzing past expenditures on similar services, such as electrical, mechanical, plumbing, HVAC, and grounds maintenance, would reveal trends in cost and scope. If previous spending was significantly lower, it might indicate an expansion of services or a change in maintenance strategy. Conversely, if spending was comparable or higher, it could suggest that the current contract represents a continuation of established investment levels. Understanding historical spending also helps in assessing whether the current contract's value is aligned with long-term budgetary commitments and operational needs at the center. Without specific historical figures, it is difficult to definitively state if this contract represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in facility upkeep.
How does the implementation of a Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) program compare to traditional maintenance approaches in terms of cost-effectiveness for federal facilities?
The implementation of a Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) program, as specified in this NASA contract, is generally considered a more proactive and potentially cost-effective approach compared to traditional reactive or time-based preventive maintenance. Traditional methods often lead to over-maintenance (replacing parts too soon) or under-maintenance (failures occurring unexpectedly), both of which can be costly. RCM focuses on identifying failure modes and their consequences, then determining the most appropriate maintenance strategy (preventive, predictive, proactive, or reactive) for each asset to ensure it performs its intended function. While RCM requires an initial investment in analysis and system setup, it aims to reduce overall maintenance costs by minimizing unexpected downtime, extending asset life, optimizing resource allocation, and preventing catastrophic failures. For federal facilities, especially those with complex and critical systems like NASA Ames, RCM can lead to significant long-term savings by improving operational reliability and reducing emergency repair expenses, thereby justifying the upfront analytical effort.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this facilities maintenance contract?
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for a facilities maintenance contract like this one typically focus on service delivery, cost control, and operational impact. Common KPIs include response times for service requests (e.g., emergency repairs, routine maintenance), completion rates for scheduled preventive maintenance tasks, equipment uptime and reliability metrics (especially for critical systems), energy efficiency improvements, and adherence to safety and environmental regulations. For this specific contract, given its emphasis on Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM), KPIs would likely also track the effectiveness of the RCM program itself, such as the reduction in unexpected equipment failures, the optimization of maintenance schedules, and the cost savings achieved through proactive interventions. Customer satisfaction surveys among NASA personnel using the facilities would also be a crucial KPI to gauge the overall effectiveness of the maintenance services provided. The contracting officer and performance management team would monitor these KPIs to ensure Amentum Technology, Inc. is meeting its contractual obligations.
What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with similar large-scale federal facilities maintenance contracts?
Amentum Technology, Inc. has a significant track record in providing large-scale facilities maintenance and support services to various government agencies. Prior to its current iteration, Amentum evolved from AECOM's Management Services division, inheriting a portfolio of complex government contracts. They have experience managing extensive facility operations, including maintenance, repair, logistics, and infrastructure support for military installations, research centers, and other federal sites. Their experience often involves managing diverse technical requirements, large workforces, and significant budgets, similar to the scope of the NASA Ames contract. Evaluating their past performance on contracts with agencies like the Department of Defense, Department of Energy, or other NASA centers would provide insight into their capabilities, reliability, and ability to manage complex RCM programs effectively. Past performance reviews and contract award histories are typically considered during the competitive bidding process for new contracts.
How does the $222.5 million contract value compare to the total annual budget for NASA Ames Research Center?
To accurately compare the $222.5 million contract value to the total annual budget for NASA Ames Research Center, specific budget data for the relevant fiscal years would be required. NASA Ames Research Center's budget encompasses a wide range of activities, including research and development, personnel costs, operational expenses, and infrastructure support. Facilities maintenance, while critical, typically represents a portion of the overall budget. If the $222.5 million contract spans approximately 10 years, the average annual cost is around $22.25 million. This figure needs to be contextualized against the center's total annual operating budget. For instance, if NASA Ames' annual budget is in the hundreds of millions or billions of dollars, this facilities contract would represent a significant but manageable segment. Conversely, if the center's budget is smaller, this contract would constitute a larger proportion of its overall financial commitment. Without the specific annual budget figures for NASA Ames during the contract's performance period, a precise comparison cannot be made, but it is understood to be a substantial investment in maintaining the center's infrastructure.
What are the potential risks associated with a 10-year contract for facilities maintenance, and how are they mitigated?
A 10-year contract for facilities maintenance presents several potential risks, primarily related to long-term performance, cost escalation, and technological obsolescence. One major risk is contractor performance degradation over time, where initial high standards may decline. This is mitigated through robust contract oversight, clearly defined performance metrics (KPIs), regular performance reviews, and potential incentive or penalty clauses. Cost escalation is another risk, especially with inflation and unforeseen maintenance needs; the firm fixed-price structure helps mitigate this by locking in costs, but contract modifications for scope changes can still impact the total value. Technological obsolescence is a concern as maintenance techniques and facility systems evolve; mitigation involves incorporating flexibility into the contract for adopting new technologies and ensuring the contractor stays abreast of industry advancements. Furthermore, reliance on a single contractor for such a long period can create dependency; NASA would mitigate this by maintaining strong contract management and potentially planning for future competitive procurements well in advance.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: NNA14497087R
Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC
Address: 600 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD, TULLAHOMA, TN, 37388
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $251,553,106
Exercised Options: $244,763,919
Current Obligation: $222,527,200
Actual Outlays: $139,431,859
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2015-10-13
Current End Date: 2026-04-12
Potential End Date: 2026-08-12 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-14
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →