NASA Awards $24.8M for Collaborative Support Facility Construction to Swinerton Builders
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,823,320 ($24.8M)
Contractor: Swinerton Builders
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2009-07-30
End Date: 2011-10-07
Contract Duration: 799 days
Daily Burn Rate: $31.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: CONSTRUCT COLLABORATIVE SUPPORT FACFILITY, BUILDING N232
Place of Performance
Location: MOFFETT FIELD, SANTA CLARA County, CALIFORNIA, 94035
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $24.8 million to SWINERTON BUILDERS for work described as: CONSTRUCT COLLABORATIVE SUPPORT FACFILITY, BUILDING N232 Key points: 1. Contract awarded for construction of a support facility. 2. Swinerton Builders is the prime contractor. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 4. The project duration was 799 days. 5. The contract type was Firm Fixed Price.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $24.8 million for the construction of a collaborative support facility appears reasonable given the project scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale institutional building projects would provide a more definitive assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. This method typically leads to competitive pricing as multiple bidders vie for the contract.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value through a competitive bidding process.
Public Impact
Construction of new federal facilities can stimulate local economies through job creation and material procurement. The facility's purpose as a 'Collaborative Support Facility' suggests it will enhance operational efficiency for NASA. Long-term maintenance and operational costs of the new facility will be a future consideration for taxpayers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns in large construction projects.
- Delays in construction timelines can impact project budgets.
- Ensuring the facility meets long-term operational needs effectively.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Firm Fixed Price contract limits cost uncertainty for the government.
- Project awarded to a known contractor (Swinerton Builders).
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector for federal projects can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs and budget allocations. Benchmarks for similar NASA construction projects would provide further context.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the prime contractor is Swinerton Builders, a large firm. There is no specific information provided regarding small business participation or subcontracting goals within this contract award.
Oversight & Accountability
The award was made by NASA, an agency with established procurement oversight processes. Monitoring the project's progress against schedule and budget will be crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Firm Fixed Price contract.
- Awarded by a major federal agency (NASA).
- Project duration appears reasonable for scope.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ca, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $24.8 million to SWINERTON BUILDERS. CONSTRUCT COLLABORATIVE SUPPORT FACFILITY, BUILDING N232
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SWINERTON BUILDERS.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-07-30. End: 2011-10-07.
What is the estimated cost per square foot for this facility, and how does it compare to similar government or commercial buildings?
Without the facility's square footage, a precise cost per square foot cannot be calculated. However, the total award of $24.8 million for a collaborative support facility suggests a significant investment. A comparison would require detailed project specifications and market data for comparable institutional buildings in the same region.
What are the primary risks associated with the construction of this facility, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Key risks include potential construction delays, unforeseen site conditions, and material cost fluctuations. Mitigation strategies likely involve detailed project planning, contingency budgeting, robust contract management by NASA, and adherence to the firm fixed-price structure which shifts some cost risk to the contractor.
How will the effectiveness of this collaborative support facility be measured post-construction?
Effectiveness will likely be measured by its ability to support NASA's operational requirements, improve collaboration among teams, and achieve projected efficiency gains. Key performance indicators could include uptime, user satisfaction, and contribution to mission success metrics, assessed through post-occupancy evaluations and operational data.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Swinerton Incorporated (UEI: 849754288)
Address: 1995 LAURELWOOD RD, SANTA CLARA, CA, 17
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $25,386,320
Exercised Options: $24,823,320
Current Obligation: $24,823,320
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-07-30
Current End Date: 2011-10-07
Potential End Date: 2011-10-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-09-11
More Contracts from Swinerton Builders
- TAS::47 4543::TAS *recovery*construction Manager AS Constructor (CMC) Services for the Repair and Alteration of the Pjkk U. S. Courthouse (part I), 300 ALA Moana Boulevard, Honolulu, Hawaii — $101.3M (General Services Administration)
- M - Construction of 4TH Infantry Division (ID) Combat Aviation Brigade (CAB) General Support Aviation Battalion (gsab) Maintenance Hangar, Project Number (PN) 77304, Fort Carson, Colorado — $60.7M (Department of Defense)
- US Department of Agriculture (usda) Agriculture Research Services (ARS) Research & Development (R&D) Center, Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Construction — $57.7M (Department of Defense)
- Design-Bid-Build Distributed Common Ground Support (dcgs) Operations Facility, Beale AFB, California — $56.6M (Department of Defense)
- 1141829 -- P234 C-40 Reserve Maintenance Hangar AT Naval AIR Station Whidbey Island, WA — $28.3M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →