NASA's $455M Cassini Project with Caltech: A 7-Year R&D Endeavor in Space Exploration
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $455,546,664 ($455.5M)
Contractor: California Institute of Technology
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2003-09-18
End Date: 2010-09-28
Contract Duration: 2,567 days
Daily Burn Rate: $177.5K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 51
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: CASSINI PROJECT
Place of Performance
Location: PASADENA, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 91125
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $455.5 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY for work described as: CASSINI PROJECT Key points: 1. The contract represents a significant investment in deep space research, focusing on the Cassini-Huygens mission to Saturn. 2. Long-term duration suggests complex, multi-phase research and development activities. 3. Sole-source nature warrants scrutiny regarding potential cost efficiencies and alternative provider evaluations. 4. The project's success hinges on scientific breakthroughs and mission objectives, rather than traditional performance metrics. 5. This contract falls under the 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences' NAICS code, indicating a focus on scientific inquiry. 6. The substantial funding allocated underscores the high-risk, high-reward nature of advanced space exploration projects.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to its highly specialized R&D nature and sole-source award. The 'Cost Plus Award Fee' (CPAF) structure incentivizes performance but can lead to costs exceeding initial estimates if not tightly managed. Without comparable sole-source R&D contracts for similar deep space missions, a direct value-for-money assessment is difficult. However, the extended duration and significant funding suggest a complex undertaking where cost control is paramount.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning NASA did not conduct a competitive bidding process. This is often justified for highly specialized research and development where only one entity possesses the unique expertise or technology required. However, the lack of competition limits price discovery and may result in higher costs than if multiple vendors had competed.
Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, a sole-source award means there was no opportunity to leverage competition to drive down costs. While justified by unique capabilities, it necessitates robust oversight to ensure fair pricing and efficient use of funds.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the scientific community and the public, through expanded knowledge of the Saturnian system and space exploration. Services delivered include complex scientific research, data analysis, and mission operations for the Cassini-Huygens spacecraft. The geographic impact is global, with data collected and shared internationally, and the mission itself traversing vast distances in space. Workforce implications include highly skilled scientists, engineers, and technicians at Caltech and NASA, fostering expertise in aerospace and planetary science.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits competitive pressure on pricing.
- Cost Plus Award Fee contracts can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not meticulously managed.
- Long contract duration increases the risk of scope creep or evolving requirements impacting final cost.
- The highly specialized nature of the work makes it difficult to benchmark against standard industry costs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded to a reputable research institution (Caltech) with a proven track record in space science.
- The 'Award Fee' component provides an incentive for performance and achieving mission objectives.
- The project aligns with NASA's strategic goals for planetary exploration and scientific discovery.
- The extended duration allowed for in-depth research and data collection, maximizing scientific return.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development (R&D) sector, specifically focusing on physical sciences and engineering related to space exploration. The market for such highly specialized deep space mission R&D is limited, often dominated by academic institutions and a few aerospace contractors. NASA's spending in this area is critical for advancing scientific knowledge and technological capabilities, with comparable projects often involving multi-year timelines and substantial budgets.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, nor are there explicit indications of significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the provided data. The nature of the work, focused on advanced scientific research and mission operations, typically involves large, specialized teams and resources, making it less conducive to broad small business participation unless through specific, targeted subcontracts.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with NASA's contracting officers and program management. The 'Award Fee' structure implies performance monitoring against defined criteria. Given the R&D nature, oversight likely focused on scientific progress, adherence to mission parameters, and responsible financial management. Transparency is generally high for NASA missions due to public interest, though specific technical details might be proprietary or classified.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Planetary Science Division Programs
- NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Contracts
- Space Exploration Research and Development
- Deep Space Mission Funding
- Cost Plus Award Fee Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award may limit cost efficiencies.
- Potential for cost overruns in CPAF contracts.
- Long-term nature increases risk of requirement changes.
- Difficulty in benchmarking specialized R&D costs.
Tags
nasa, caltech, research-and-development, space-exploration, sole-source, cost-plus-award-fee, deep-space-mission, california, scientific-research, aerospace
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $455.5 million to CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. CASSINI PROJECT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $455.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-09-18. End: 2010-09-28.
What was the primary scientific objective of the Cassini Project?
The primary scientific objective of the Cassini Project was to study the planet Saturn, its moons, rings, and magnetosphere in unprecedented detail. Launched in 1997 and arriving at Saturn in 2004, the mission aimed to understand the formation and evolution of the Saturnian system. Key goals included investigating the composition and structure of Saturn's atmosphere and rings, studying the geology and chemistry of its moons (particularly Titan and Enceladus), and exploring the planet's magnetosphere. The mission successfully deployed the Huygens probe onto Titan's surface, providing the first direct measurements from within its atmosphere and on its surface. The Cassini orbiter continued to gather data until its mission concluded with a planned plunge into Saturn's atmosphere in 2017, providing invaluable insights into gas giants and the potential for life beyond Earth.
How does the 'Cost Plus Award Fee' (CPAF) contract type typically function in R&D settings?
A Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract is a type of cost-reimbursement contract where the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred, plus a fee that consists of a fixed base amount and an award amount. The award amount is determined by the government based on the contractor's performance against pre-defined criteria. In R&D settings like the Cassini Project, this structure incentivizes the contractor (Caltech) to not only manage costs but also to achieve specific scientific and technical milestones. The government establishes objective performance metrics related to research progress, data quality, and mission objectives. If the contractor meets or exceeds these metrics, they receive a higher award fee. This provides flexibility for the inherent uncertainties in R&D while encouraging high performance and innovation.
What are the risks associated with a sole-source award for a long-term R&D project like Cassini?
Sole-source awards for long-term R&D projects like Cassini carry several inherent risks. Firstly, the lack of competition means there is no market pressure to drive down costs, potentially leading to higher prices than if multiple bidders had competed. Secondly, without competitive benchmarking, it can be challenging for the government to ensure the contractor is operating with maximum efficiency. Thirdly, there's a risk of complacency or reduced innovation from the sole provider over the long duration of the contract. Finally, if the initial justification for a sole-source award (e.g., unique expertise) becomes less valid over time due to technological advancements or the emergence of other capable entities, the government may be locked into a less-than-optimal arrangement. Robust oversight and clear performance metrics are crucial to mitigate these risks.
How does the duration of the Cassini contract (2003-2010) compare to typical R&D contracts in aerospace?
The duration of the Cassini Project contract, spanning approximately seven years from 2003 to 2010 (though the overall mission extended much longer), is relatively typical for large-scale, complex R&D projects in the aerospace sector, especially those involving deep space exploration. Such missions require extensive planning, development, testing, launch operations, and ongoing data analysis. Contracts for these endeavors often span multiple phases, from initial design and hardware development through mission operations and data dissemination. While some R&D contracts might be shorter-term, focusing on specific technological advancements, major scientific missions like Cassini necessitate long-term commitments to achieve their ambitious scientific goals and maximize the return on investment in terms of knowledge gained.
What is the significance of the NAICS code 541710 for this contract?
The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541710, 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences,' is highly significant for the Cassini Project contract. This classification indicates that the primary purpose of the contract was to conduct scientific research and experimental development in fields such as physics, chemistry, biology, engineering, and computer science. For the Cassini mission, this specifically relates to the physical sciences and engineering required for space exploration, spacecraft design, instrument development, and the analysis of data collected from the Saturnian system. This code helps categorize government spending, allows for industry analysis, and signals the contract's focus on innovation and the advancement of scientific knowledge rather than the procurement of standard goods or services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Space R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 51
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4800 OAK GROVE DR, PASADENA, CA, 91109
Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $474,424,600
Exercised Options: $474,424,600
Current Obligation: $455,546,664
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NAS703001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-09-18
Current End Date: 2010-09-28
Potential End Date: 2010-09-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-10
More Contracts from California Institute of Technology
- Europa Clipper Project the Contract IS the Sponsoring Agreement Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Nasa and the California Institute of Technology-Contractor, a Private Nonprofit Educational Institution, Which Establishes the Relationship for the Operation of the Federally Funded Research and Development Center-Ffrdc Known AS the JET Propulsion Laboratory. the Contractor, JPL, IS Required to Perform Work That IS Designated in Task Orders Issued by the Nasa Management Office-Nmo Contracting Officers. Nasa-Sponsored Work: Jpls Primary Mission IS to Support the Nasa Science Mission Directorate-Smd in Carrying OUT the Specific Objectives Identified in the SMD Science Plan. the Four Broad Scientific Areas ARE: Earth Science, Planetary Science, Heliophysics, and Astrophysics. in Performance of This Contract, JPL Shall: 1. Supply a Broad Base of Scientific and Technical Capabilities Relevant to Nasa Program and Project Responsibilities and Assignments. 2. Foster ITS Unique Relationship With a Top-Tier University to Facilitate the Involvement of Scientists, Engineers, and Students From the University and Research Communities in Nasa Mission and in Supporting Other Government Agencies. 3. Support Nasa in Enabling Program and Institutional Capabilities. 4. Develop Spacecraft and Instruments That ARE Sent to Various Destinations With OUR Solar System, Including Earth Orbit, Planets, Planetary Satellites, Asteroids, and Comets. These Missions MAY BE Orbiters, Landers, or Rovers, and Typically Include Cutting-Edge Technologies Required to Meet Scientific Requirements. 5. Perform Project Tasks Involving: I-Autonomous Deep-Space, Inner-Space and Earth-Orbiting Spacecraft or Major Subsystems, Ii-Experiments, Instruments, or Other Devices Which MAY BE Carried AS Payload on Spacecrafts in Missions Managed by Others, And-Or Iii-Ground-Based Systems. 6. Beyond ITS Primary Mission, JPL MAY Perform Work for Other Nasa Mission Directorates or Offices. 7. JPL IS Also Responsible for the Operation, Research, Technology Insertion, and Management of Nasas Deep Space Network to Provide Telecommunication and Operation Services, Including Data Acquisition and Data Delivery Required to Meet Established Agency Objectives. 8. JPL IS Also Required to Maintain and Conduct an Education Program in Close Coordination With the Nasa Headquarters Education Office, the Academic Community AT Large, and in Support to Nasa Strategic Objectives to Improve Student Retention in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics-Stem Disciplines. Work for Non-Nasa Sponsors: JPL MAY Perform Work for Non-Nasa Sponsors. This Work Will BE Designated in Task Orders Issued by NMO Contracting Officers Based on Task Plans Initiated by the Contractor — $2.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Mars Science Laboratory — $1.7B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Mars Sample Return (MSR) Program - Phase a 40-108270 — $1.6B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Deep Space Network (DSN) the Contract IS the Sponsoring Agreement Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) and the California Institute of Technology (contractor), a Private Nonprofit Educational Institution, Which Establishes the Relationship for the Operation of the Federally Funded Research and Development Center (ffrdc) Known AS the JET Propulsion Laboratory. the Contractor, JPL, IS Required to Perform Work That IS Designated in Task Orders Issued by the Nasa Management Office (NMO) Contracting Officers. Nasa - Sponsored Work: Jpl's Primary Mission IS to Support the Nasa Science Mission Directorate (SMD) in Carrying OUT the Specific Objectives Identified in the SMD Science Plan. the Four Broad Scientific Areas ARE: Earth Science, Planetary Science, Heliophysics, and Astrophysics. in Performance of This Contract, JPL Shall: 1) Supply a Broad Base of Scientific and Technical Capabilities Relevant to Nasa Program and Project Responsibilities and Assignments. 2) Foster ITS Unique Relationship With a Top-Tier University to Facilitate the Involvement of Scientists, Engineers, and Students From the University and Research Communities in Nasa Mission and in Supporting Other Government Agencies. 3) Support Nasa in Enabling Program and Institutional Capabilities. 4) Develop Spacecraft and Instruments That ARE Sent to Various Destinations With OUR Solar System, Including Earth Orbit, Planets, Planetary Satellites, Asteroids, and Comets. These Missions MAY BE Orbiters, Landers, or Rovers, and Typically Include Cutting-Edge Technologies Required to Meet Scientific Requirements. 5) Perform Project Tasks Involving: (I) Autonomous Deep-Space, Inner-Space and Earth-Orbiting Spacecraft or Major Subsystems, (II) Experiments, Instruments, or Other Devices Which MAY BE Carried AS Payload on Spacecrafts in Missions Managed by Others, And/Or (III) Ground-Based Systems. 6) Beyond ITS Primary Mission, JPL MAY Perform Work for Other Nasa Mission Directorates or Offices. 7) JPL IS Also Responsible for the Operation, Research, Technology Insertion, and Management of Nasa S Deep Space Network to Provide Telecommunication and Operation Services, Including Data Acquisition and Data Delivery Required to Meet Established Agency Objectives. 8) JPL IS Also Required to Maintain and Conduct an Education Program in Close Coordination With the Nasa Headquarters Education Office, the Academic Community AT Large, and in Support to Nasa Strategic Objectives to Improve Student Retention in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (stem) Disciplines. Work for Non-Nasa Sponsors: JPL MAY Perform Work for Non-Nasa Sponsors. This Work Will BE Designated in Task Orders Issued by NMO Contracting Officers Based on Task Plans Initiated by the Contractor — $1.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 2020 Mars Science Rover Project - Phase a the Contract IS the Sponsoring Agreement Between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) and the California Institute of Technology (contractor), a Private Nonprofit Educational Institution, Which Establishes the Relationship for the Operation of the Federally Funded Research and Development Center (ffrdc) Known AS the JET Propulsion Laboratory. the Contractor, JPL, IS Required to Perform Work That IS Designated in Task Orders Issued by the Nasa Management Office (NMO) Contracting Officers. Nasa - Sponsored Work: Jpl's Primary Mission IS to Support the Nasa Science Mission Directorate (SMD) in Carrying OUT the Specific Objectives Identified in the SMD Science Plan. the Four Broad Scientific Areas ARE: Earth Science, Planetary Science, Heliophysics, and Astrophysics. in Performance of This Contract, JPL Shall: 1) Supply a Broad Base of Scientific and Technical Capabilities Relevant to Nasa Program and Project Responsibilities and Assignments. 2) Foster ITS Unique Relationship With a Top-Tier University to Facilitate the Involvement of Scientists, Engineers, and Students From the University and Research Communities in Nasa Mission and in Supporting Other Government Agencies. 3) Support Nasa in Enabling Program and Institutional Capabilities. 4) Develop Spacecraft and Instruments That ARE Sent to Various Destinations With OUR Solar System, Including Earth Orbit, Planets, Planetary Satellites, Asteroids, and Comets. These Missions MAY BE Orbiters, Landers, or Rovers, and Typically Include Cutting-Edge Technologies Required to Meet Scientific Requirements. 5) Perform Project Tasks Involving: (I) Autonomous Deep-Space, Inner-Space and Earth-Orbiting Spacecraft or Major Subsystems, (II) Experiments, Instruments, or Other Devices Which MAY BE Carried AS Payload on Spacecrafts in Missions Managed by Others, And/Or (III) Ground-Based Systems. 6) Beyond ITS Primary Mission, JPL MAY Perform Work for Other Nasa Mission Directorates or Offices. 7) JPL IS Also Responsible for the Operation, Research, Technology Insertion, and Management of Nasa S Deep Space Network to Provide Telecommunication and Operation Services, Including Data Acquisition and Data Delivery Required to Meet Established Agency Objectives. 8) JPL IS Also Required to Maintain and Conduct an Education Program in Close Coordination With the Nasa Headquarters Education Office, the Academic Community AT Large, and in Support to Nasa Strategic Objectives to Improve Student Retention in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (stem) Disciplines. Work for Non-Nasa Sponsors: JPL MAY Perform Work for Non-Nasa Sponsors. This Work Will BE Designated in Task Orders Issued by NMO Contracting Officers Based on Task Plans Initiated by the Contractor — $1.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
View all California Institute of Technology federal contracts →
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →