DoD's $28.6M Facilities Support Services Contract Awarded to Amentum Technology, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $28,581,120 ($28.6M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-07-22
End Date: 2026-05-31
Contract Duration: 313 days
Daily Burn Rate: $91.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: OY4 FIXED PRICE FUNDING RECURRING SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: KINGS BAY, CAMDEN County, GEORGIA, 31547
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $28.6 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: OY4 FIXED PRICE FUNDING RECURRING SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract focuses on recurring facilities support services, indicating a need for ongoing operational maintenance. 2. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs by setting a predetermined price for services. 3. Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process was utilized. 4. The contract duration of 313 days points to a medium-term service requirement. 5. Services are categorized under Facilities Support Services, a broad but essential operational category. 6. The contract is a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle, typical for phased or modular service delivery.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's firm-fixed-price nature provides cost certainty for the government. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the competitive award process suggests a reasonable price was likely achieved. The total value of $28.6 million for a period of approximately 10 months (July 2025 to May 2026) appears within a reasonable range for comprehensive facilities support services, especially considering the scope implied by a delivery order under a larger contract.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This process typically fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best pricing and service proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition that should lead to favorable price discovery for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process for this contract helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs and encouraging high-quality service delivery.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense benefits from reliable and consistent facilities support, ensuring operational readiness. Services delivered likely include maintenance, repair, and potentially management of facilities infrastructure. The geographic impact is centered in Georgia (SN: GEORGIA), where the facilities are located. Workforce implications may include the direct employment of personnel by Amentum Technology, Inc. and potential indirect employment in supporting industries.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if initial service requirements are not clearly defined.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities operations could pose a risk if performance falters.
- The recurring nature of the services requires continuous monitoring to ensure ongoing value.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract helps manage budget predictability.
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market was leveraged.
- The contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., likely has established expertise in facilities support services.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services represent a significant segment of the government contracting market, encompassing a wide range of activities necessary for the operation and maintenance of physical infrastructure. This sector is characterized by a mix of large, established providers and smaller, specialized firms. Government spending in this area is often driven by the need to maintain readiness and operational efficiency across various agencies and military branches. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically look at per-square-foot maintenance costs or total facilities management costs for similar-sized installations.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific contract award. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best overall value through full and open competition. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which would typically be detailed in the contract's statement of work or associated documentation. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal for this particular award, as it appears to be a direct award to a larger entity.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Navy. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price structure, which incentivizes the contractor to meet performance standards within the agreed-upon budget. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics and detailed spending breakdowns may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Base Operations Support Services
- Facilities Maintenance Contracts
- Logistics and Support Services
- Government Facilities Management
Risk Flags
- Potential for performance issues if contractor resources are overstretched.
- Risk of cost overruns if scope is not clearly defined and managed.
- Dependence on contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, facilities-support-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, georgia, recurring-services, amentum-technology-inc
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $28.6 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. OY4 FIXED PRICE FUNDING RECURRING SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $28.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-07-22. End: 2026-05-31.
What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense for facilities support services?
Amentum Technology, Inc. has a significant history of performing services for the Department of Defense, including extensive work in facilities support, base operations, and related areas. Their experience often spans large-scale contracts requiring comprehensive management of infrastructure, maintenance, and operational support across various military installations. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, including any reported issues or commendations, would provide further insight into their capability and reliability for this specific award. Publicly available contract databases and performance reports (like past performance questionnaires) can offer details on their execution, on-time delivery, and adherence to quality standards in previous DoD engagements.
How does the $28.6 million value compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Navy?
The $28.6 million value for approximately 10 months of facilities support services needs to be benchmarked against contracts of similar scope, duration, and geographic location. The Navy, like other branches of the DoD, awards numerous facilities support contracts annually. A direct comparison would involve analyzing the per-square-foot cost, the range of services included (e.g., janitorial, groundskeeping, minor repairs, HVAC maintenance), and the specific type of facility being supported (e.g., barracks, administrative buildings, training facilities). Without more granular data on the specific services and facility types covered by this $28.6 million award, it's challenging to definitively state if it's high or low. However, given the firm-fixed-price structure and full and open competition, it suggests an effort to achieve competitive pricing for the defined scope.
What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price contract for facilities support?
The primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price contract for facilities support revolve around potential scope definition issues and contractor performance. If the statement of work is not sufficiently detailed, the contractor might underperform on essential tasks, or the government might face unexpected costs if additional services are required and not covered by the original agreement. Conversely, a contractor might cut corners on quality to maintain profitability if the fixed price is too aggressive. Another risk is contractor default or poor performance, which could disrupt essential facility operations. The government's ability to effectively manage and oversee the contract, including robust quality assurance surveillance, is crucial to mitigating these risks.
How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach in ensuring value for taxpayer money in this contract?
The 'full and open competition' approach is generally considered highly effective in ensuring value for taxpayer money, as it maximizes the pool of potential bidders and encourages competitive pricing. By allowing all responsible sources to participate, the government increases the likelihood of receiving multiple proposals, which drives down costs and fosters innovation. This process typically leads to a more transparent price discovery mechanism. However, the ultimate effectiveness depends on the clarity of the solicitation requirements, the evaluation criteria used, and the government's ability to properly assess proposals to select the best value, not just the lowest price. For facilities support services, competition can lead to better service quality and more efficient operations.
What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the Department of the Navy in Georgia?
Historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the Department of the Navy in Georgia would likely show consistent and significant investment due to the presence of major naval installations in the state. These patterns are often characterized by multi-year contracts awarded through competitive processes, reflecting the ongoing need for maintenance, repair, and operational support. Spending levels can fluctuate based on infrastructure upgrades, new construction, or changes in operational requirements. Analyzing past awards in the region would reveal the typical contract values, durations, and the primary contractors involved, providing context for the current $28.6 million award. This data can help identify trends in service costs and contractor concentration.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC
Address: 604 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD., TULLAHOMA, TN, 37388
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $28,581,120
Exercised Options: $28,581,120
Current Obligation: $28,581,120
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6945020D0045
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-07-22
Current End Date: 2026-05-31
Potential End Date: 2026-05-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-01-12
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)