DoD awards $18.3M facilities support contract to Amentum Technology, Inc. for FY25 operations
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $18,308,985 ($18.3M)
Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-10-01
End Date: 2025-05-31
Contract Duration: 242 days
Daily Burn Rate: $75.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: FY25 FFP FUNDS
Place of Performance
Location: KINGS BAY, CAMDEN County, GEORGIA, 31547
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $18.3 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: FY25 FFP FUNDS Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating predictable costs for the government. 2. The contract duration of 242 days suggests a focused, short-term operational need. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, implying a robust bidding process. 4. Facilities support services are critical for maintaining operational readiness. 5. The contract is a delivery order, likely part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle. 6. Geographic location in Georgia may indicate specific base or facility support requirements.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The base award amount of $18.3M for approximately 8 months of service appears reasonable for specialized support, but a detailed cost breakdown and comparison to market rates for similar services in Georgia would be necessary for a definitive assessment. The absence of options suggests a defined scope for this period.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The government likely received proposals from various companies capable of providing facilities support services, leading to a more favorable outcome for the taxpayer.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically results in better pricing for taxpayers by leveraging market forces to drive down costs and ensure the best value is obtained.
Public Impact
The Department of the Navy benefits from the continuity of essential facilities support services. Military personnel and operations at the supported facility in Georgia will experience maintained infrastructure. The contract supports the operational readiness of a key Department of Defense installation. Local workforce in Georgia may see employment opportunities through Amentum Technology, Inc. or its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if the initial 242-day period requires extensions or modifications.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities maintenance could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process.
- Firm-fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty.
- Clear start and end dates define the contract's scope and duration.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a broad category encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of buildings and grounds. This sector is crucial for government operations, ensuring that infrastructure is functional and safe. The market includes numerous providers, from large facility management corporations to specialized service companies. This contract fits within the broader defense sector's need for reliable base operations support.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses mandated by a set-aside. However, the prime contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., may still engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill specific aspects of the facilities support services, contributing to the broader small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract structure, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Base Operations Support (BOS)
- Facilities Maintenance Services
- Logistics and Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for performance issues impacting operational readiness.
- Risk of cost increases if contract scope requires significant modification.
- Dependency on contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, facilities-support-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, georgia, amentum-technology-inc, fy25, operational-readiness
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $18.3 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. FY25 FFP FUNDS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $18.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-10-01. End: 2025-05-31.
What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense for similar facilities support contracts?
Amentum Technology, Inc. has a significant history of performing services for the Department of Defense, including extensive experience in facilities operations and maintenance. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those involving base operations support or facility management at military installations, would reveal their reliability, quality of service, and adherence to contract terms. Reviewing contract awards and performance evaluations, where available, can provide insights into their capabilities and potential risks associated with their performance. Their established presence suggests a capacity to handle large-scale government contracts, but specific project histories are key to a comprehensive assessment.
How does the awarded amount compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Navy or other DoD branches?
To benchmark the value of this $18.3 million contract, a comparison with similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy or other Department of Defense branches is essential. Factors such as contract duration (approximately 8 months), scope of services (facilities support), geographic location (Georgia), and contract type (firm-fixed-price) should be considered. If comparable contracts show significantly higher or lower per-month costs for similar services, it could indicate potential overpricing or exceptional value. Analyzing the number of bidders in comparable full-and-open competitions can also shed light on whether the market dynamics here are typical.
What are the primary risks associated with this specific facilities support contract?
Key risks for this facilities support contract include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., which could impact the operational readiness of the supported facility. Given the firm-fixed-price nature, there's a risk of the contractor cutting corners to maintain profitability if not adequately monitored. Another risk is the dependency on a single provider for critical services; any disruption to Amentum's operations could have immediate consequences. Furthermore, unforeseen facility issues or changes in operational requirements not covered by the contract could lead to costly modifications or disputes. The relatively short duration (242 days) might also imply a need for rapid transition or potential follow-on contract risks.
How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money in facilities support services?
The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money for the government in facilities support services, especially when the scope of work is well-defined and unlikely to change significantly. FFP shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, incentivizing them to manage costs efficiently and perform the work within the agreed-upon price. This predictability is beneficial for budgeting. However, for complex or evolving facilities needs, an FFP contract might limit flexibility and could potentially lead to the contractor resisting necessary changes or performing only the minimum required services if not carefully managed and overseen. Robust performance metrics and oversight are still crucial.
What is the historical spending trend for facilities support services within the Department of the Navy?
Historical spending trends for facilities support services within the Department of the Navy are substantial, reflecting the vast infrastructure the Navy maintains globally. The Navy consistently allocates significant portions of its budget to ensure its bases and facilities are operational, safe, and secure. This includes spending on maintenance, repairs, utilities management, groundskeeping, and other essential services. Analyzing trends over multiple fiscal years would reveal patterns in contract awards, average contract values, and the prevalence of different contract types (e.g., FFP vs. cost-plus) and competition levels. Such analysis helps contextualize individual contract awards like this one within the Navy's broader procurement strategy for facilities management.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N6945019R1900
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC
Address: 604 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD., TULLAHOMA, TN, 37388
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $18,308,985
Exercised Options: $18,308,985
Current Obligation: $18,308,985
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6945020D0045
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-10-01
Current End Date: 2025-05-31
Potential End Date: 2025-05-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-05-22
More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.
- THE Test and Operations Support Contract (tosc) IS a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee Contract With an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Task Ordering Provision. Tosc Provides a Processing Contract for the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Supporting Multiple Customers. the Scope of This Contract Includes Program Management and Control; Safety and Mission Assurance; Information Management; Processing Support Systems and Integration; Flight Hardware Processing; Ground Systems Operations, Maintenance and Sustaining Engineering; Logistics and Spaceport Services. Tosc Provides Overall Management and Implementation of Ground Systems Capabilities, Flight Hardware Processing and Launch Operations AT KSC in Florida. These Tasks Will Support the International Space Station, Ground Systems Development and Operations, and the Space Launch System, Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Launch Services Programs. Tosc Also Provides Ground Processing for Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft and Payloads in Support of Emerging Programs, Commercial Entities and Other Government Agencies AS Designated by the Government. Services Include Advanced Planning and Special Studies; Development of Designated Ground Systems; Operational Support for Design and Development of Flight Hardware and Ground Systems; Spacecraft, Payload, and Launch Vehicle Servicing and Processing; Ground Systems Services; and Logistics and Other Processing Support Services. Flight Hardware Processing and Servicing Activities Include Assembly, Integration, Checkout, and Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair. Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Operations Include Advanced Planning, Element Processing, Integration, Test, Launch and Recovery Services. Ground Systems Services Include Operations, Maintenance and Validation of Associated Ground Systems and Support Equipment Necessary for Human Space Flight and Exploration. Contract Activities Will BE Performed in the Most Cost-Effective and Efficient Manner Supporting the Government S Priorities for Safety, Mission Success, Customer Satisfaction and Innovation While Maintaining Flexibility and Responsiveness to Changing Requirements. With the Award of This Contract, KSC IS Positioning Itself for the Next ERA of Space Exploration. KSC IS Transitioning to a 21st-Century Launch Facility With Multiple Users, Both Private and Government. a Dynamic Infrastructure IS Taking Shape, Designed to Host Many Kinds of Spacecraft and Rockets Sending People on America's Next Voyages in Space — $2.1B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Science Contract — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Engineering Services and Science Capability Augmentation (essca) — $1.9B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enterprise Core Services (enduring) — $979.2M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering Science and Technology — $874.0M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)