DoD's $6.28M EW/ES Trainer Evolution contract awarded to RITE-SOLUTIONS, INC. under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,276,451 ($6.3M)

Contractor: Rite-Solutions, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2019-05-24

End Date: 2024-05-31

Contract Duration: 1,834 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: SYSTEM HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUSIVE OF ANALYSIS, DESIGN, PROTOTYPING, PROGRAMMING, CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT, INTEGRATION, TEST AND EVALUATION, PROGRAM SUPPORT, TRAINING AND INSTALLATION OF PRODUCTS THAT COMPRISE EARLY WARNING (EW) AND ELECTRONIC SUPPORT (ES) TRAINER EVOLUTION

Place of Performance

Location: NEWPORT, NEWPORT County, RHODE ISLAND, 02841

State: Rhode Island Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $6.3 million to RITE-SOLUTIONS, INC. for work described as: SYSTEM HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUSIVE OF ANALYSIS, DESIGN, PROTOTYPING, PROGRAMMING, CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT, INTEGRATION, TEST AND EVALUATION, PROGRAM SUPPORT, TRAINING AND INSTALLATION OF PRODUCTS THAT COMPRISE EARLY WARNING (EW) AND ELECTRONIC SUPPORT (ES) TRAIN… Key points: 1. The contract focuses on developing and supporting early warning and electronic support trainer systems. 2. RITE-SOLUTIONS, INC. is the prime contractor for this significant defense technology development. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract spans over 5 years, indicating a long-term development and support requirement.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure allows for flexibility in development but requires careful oversight to manage costs. The total award value of $6.28M for an 1834-day duration appears reasonable for complex system development.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which typically drives competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The multiple delivery orders (3) suggest phased development or support.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition aims to maximize taxpayer value by fostering a competitive environment for contract awards.

Public Impact

Enhances national security capabilities through advanced training systems. Supports the development of critical defense technologies for early warning and electronic support. Potential for technological advancements in the defense sector. Impacts personnel training and readiness for electronic warfare scenarios.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns with CPFF contract type if not managed closely.
Long contract duration may require ongoing monitoring for scope creep.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical system evolution.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Focus on critical defense capabilities.
Experienced contractor likely involved.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically related to defense systems development. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining technological superiority and readiness. Benchmarks for similar complex system development contracts vary widely based on scope and technology.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb: false). Therefore, small businesses were likely not direct prime contractors on this award, though they may be subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) is responsible for oversight. The CPFF contract type necessitates robust oversight to ensure cost control and adherence to the fixed fee. Multiple delivery orders may require careful tracking of overall project progress.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Cost control risks associated with CPFF.
Long-term project management complexity.
Potential for technological obsolescence over the contract duration.
Dependence on contractor's technical expertise.
Ensuring adequate competition for future related procurements.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $6.3 million to RITE-SOLUTIONS, INC.. SYSTEM HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUSIVE OF ANALYSIS, DESIGN, PROTOTYPING, PROGRAMMING, CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT, INTEGRATION, TEST AND EVALUATION, PROGRAM SUPPORT, TRAINING AND INSTALLATION OF PRODUCTS THAT COMPRISE EARLY WARNING (EW) AND ELECTRONIC SUPPORT (ES) TRAINER EVOLUTION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RITE-SOLUTIONS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-05-24. End: 2024-05-31.

What is the projected return on investment for the development of these EW/ES trainer systems?

The return on investment is primarily measured in enhanced warfighter readiness and improved mission effectiveness. Quantifying this in monetary terms is challenging but crucial for long-term defense strategy. The systems are expected to reduce training costs and improve skill retention, indirectly contributing to cost savings and operational efficiency.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the success of this contract?

Key performance indicators likely include system reliability, training effectiveness metrics (e.g., skill acquisition rates, simulation fidelity), adherence to development schedules, and cost performance against the fixed fee. The contractor's ability to meet technical specifications and deliver functional trainer systems within budget and on time are paramount.

How will the effectiveness of the training provided by these systems be evaluated post-deployment?

Post-deployment evaluation will likely involve feedback from training instructors and end-users, performance assessments of personnel trained on the systems, and analysis of operational data. Periodic reviews and user surveys will help identify areas for improvement and ensure the systems continue to meet evolving training needs and defense objectives.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N6660418R3003

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 185 SOUTH BROAD ST. SUITE 303, PAWCATUCK, CT, 06379

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,854,328

Exercised Options: $16,854,328

Current Obligation: $6,276,451

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4115

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline