DoD's $35.5M IT maintenance contract awarded to 3M Company shows limited competition and potential value concerns
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $35,477,576 ($35.5M)
Contractor: 3M Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2014-10-01
End Date: 2019-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $19.4K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: SAN ANTONIO, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78226
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $35.5 million to 3M COMPANY for work described as: MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting price discovery and potentially increasing costs. 2. High contract value for IT maintenance services suggests significant reliance on the contractor. 3. Long contract duration of 5 years indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor, but may include inflated pricing due to lack of competition. 5. Contractor's primary NAICS code is Custom Computer Programming Services, suggesting a focus on software development rather than pure maintenance. 6. Awarded by the Defense Health Agency, highlighting the critical IT infrastructure supporting military healthcare. 7. Contract value is substantial, warranting close scrutiny of performance and cost-effectiveness.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The total contract value of $35.5 million over five years for IT maintenance and support services appears high, especially given the sole-source award. Without competitive bidding, it is difficult to benchmark the pricing against market rates or similar contracts. The fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the government has accepted the contractor's proposed price, which may not reflect the best value if competition was suppressed. Further analysis of the specific services rendered and their necessity would be required to fully assess value for money.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one bidder, 3M Company, was solicited. This approach bypasses the standard competitive procurement process, which typically involves soliciting bids from multiple qualified vendors. While sole-source awards can be justified in specific circumstances (e.g., unique capabilities, urgent needs), they generally lead to less price competition and can result in higher costs for the government compared to fully competed contracts. The lack of competition here means taxpayers did not benefit from potential cost savings that could arise from a bidding process.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition means taxpayers may have paid a premium for these IT maintenance services. Without a competitive environment, there is less pressure on the contractor to offer the lowest possible price.
Public Impact
Military personnel and beneficiaries of the Defense Health Agency likely benefit from the continued operation of critical IT systems. Essential IT maintenance and support services are delivered, ensuring the functionality of the healthcare IT infrastructure. The geographic impact is primarily within the Defense Health Agency's operational areas, supporting its nationwide and potentially global IT needs. Workforce implications are likely concentrated within 3M Company's IT support staff, with potential indirect impacts on government IT personnel managing the contract.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers.
- Lack of transparency in pricing due to no competitive bidding process.
- Potential for vendor lock-in given the long-term nature of the contract and sole-source award.
- Contract duration of five years may not align with rapidly evolving IT needs, risking obsolescence.
- The specific nature of 'maintenance and support' for custom computer programming services needs clear definition to ensure value.
Positive Signals
- Fixed-price contract shifts performance risk to the contractor.
- Award to a large, established company like 3M may indicate a level of reliability and existing infrastructure.
- The contract supports critical IT infrastructure for the Defense Health Agency, a vital government function.
- Long-term contract provides stability for service delivery and planning for the agency.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically focusing on maintenance and support services for custom computer programming. The IT services market is vast and highly competitive, with numerous companies offering specialized solutions. However, for specific, long-term, and potentially proprietary IT systems, sole-source or limited competition awards can occur. Benchmarking IT maintenance costs is complex, as it depends heavily on the specific systems, software, and hardware involved, as well as the level of support required. The $35.5 million value over five years places this contract in the mid-to-large tier for IT support contracts within the federal government.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. Furthermore, the contractor, 3M Company, is a large corporation, suggesting that subcontracting opportunities for small businesses might be limited or not explicitly mandated within this specific award. Analysis of 3M's overall subcontracting plans with the Defense Health Agency would be necessary to determine the broader impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Health Agency's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award, making public scrutiny of the bidding process impossible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Defense Health Agency IT Modernization Programs
- Department of Defense Enterprise IT Services
- Federal Civilian Health IT Contracts
- Custom Software Development Services Contracts
- IT Maintenance and Support Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award raises concerns about competition and potential overpricing.
- Lack of transparency in the procurement process.
- Long contract duration may not be optimal for rapidly evolving IT needs.
- Potential for vendor lock-in.
Tags
it-services, maintenance-and-support, department-of-defense, defense-health-agency, sole-source, definitive-contract, firm-fixed-price, custom-computer-programming-services, large-contract, texas, it-infrastructure
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $35.5 million to 3M COMPANY. MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is 3M COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Health Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $35.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2014-10-01. End: 2019-09-30.
What is the track record of 3M Company in delivering IT maintenance and support services to the federal government, particularly within the Department of Defense?
3M Company has a long history of providing various products and services to the federal government, including within the Department of Defense. While known for a diverse range of products, their specific track record in IT maintenance and support for complex systems like those managed by the Defense Health Agency requires detailed examination. Federal procurement databases show 3M has received numerous contracts across different agencies. However, the performance quality, cost-effectiveness, and adherence to schedules for IT-specific services, especially under sole-source awards, would need to be assessed through contract performance reports (CPARs) and agency-specific evaluations. Without direct access to these detailed performance metrics for this specific contract, it's challenging to provide a definitive assessment of their track record in this niche.
How does the $35.5 million contract value compare to similar IT maintenance and support contracts awarded by the Defense Health Agency or other DoD components?
Comparing the $35.5 million contract value for five years of IT maintenance and support services requires careful consideration of the scope, complexity, and specific technologies involved. As this was a sole-source award, direct price comparisons with competitively bid contracts are inherently difficult. However, general benchmarks for IT support services can be established. For instance, contracts for similar-sized agencies or for comparable systems (e.g., electronic health records, network infrastructure) might range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars over similar periods. The key differentiator here is the lack of competition, which means this $35.5 million figure cannot be definitively labeled as high or low without a competitive baseline. If similar, competitively procured contracts for comparable services exist, they would serve as a better benchmark for value.
What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for critical IT maintenance and support services, and how might they manifest in this case?
The primary risks associated with a sole-source award for critical IT maintenance and support services include inflated pricing due to the absence of competitive pressure, potential for complacency from the contractor, and a lack of innovation. In this case, the $35.5 million awarded to 3M Company might be higher than if multiple vendors had competed. There's also a risk that the contractor may not be as motivated to provide the most efficient or cutting-edge support, potentially leading to system vulnerabilities or slower response times. Furthermore, the government may face challenges in transitioning to a different vendor in the future if the sole-source relationship becomes deeply entrenched, creating vendor lock-in. The long, five-year duration exacerbates these risks.
What specific IT systems or services are covered under this 'maintenance and support' contract, and how critical are they to the Defense Health Agency's mission?
The provided data indicates the contract covers 'MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES' with a primary NAICS code of '541511' (Custom Computer Programming Services). This suggests the contract likely involves maintaining and supporting software applications, databases, or IT infrastructure that were either developed by 3M or are highly specialized and require their unique expertise. Given it's for the Defense Health Agency (DHA), these systems are likely critical for managing military health records, operational readiness data, medical logistics, or other essential healthcare functions supporting service members and their families. The exact systems are not specified, but their criticality can be inferred from the agency's mission. Without more granular detail on the specific systems, it's hard to quantify their exact impact, but any IT system supporting healthcare operations is inherently critical.
What has been the historical spending trend for IT maintenance and support services by the Defense Health Agency, and how does this contract fit within that pattern?
Analyzing historical spending trends for IT maintenance and support by the Defense Health Agency (DHA) would require access to comprehensive federal procurement data over several fiscal years. This specific contract, valued at $35.5 million over five years (approximately $7.1 million annually), represents a significant but not necessarily extraordinary investment for a large agency like the DHA. If the DHA has consistently spent similar amounts on IT support for its critical systems, this contract would fit within that pattern. However, if spending has been increasing significantly, it might indicate growing IT needs or rising costs. Conversely, a decrease could suggest consolidation or efficiency gains. Without historical data specific to DHA's IT maintenance spending, it's difficult to place this contract within a precise trend.
Are there any specific performance metrics or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract that can be used to evaluate the contractor's performance?
The provided data does not include specific performance metrics or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. Typically, federal contracts, especially those for IT services, include detailed SLAs that define expected performance standards, response times, uptime requirements, and other measurable outcomes. These SLAs are crucial for evaluating the contractor's adherence to the contract's terms and ensuring the government receives the value it paid for. In the absence of this information, assessing the contractor's performance relies heavily on qualitative assessments and potentially contract-specific reports that are not publicly available. The fixed-price nature implies deliverables are expected, but the quality and timeliness are usually governed by SLAs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services
Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3M CENTER BLDG 220 11W 02, SAINT PAUL, MN, 55144
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $35,477,576
Exercised Options: $35,477,576
Current Obligation: $35,477,576
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2014-10-01
Current End Date: 2019-09-30
Potential End Date: 2019-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-21
More Contracts from 3M Company
- N95 Masks Covid-19 — $172.8M (Department of Health and Human Services)
- Covid-19 Dhhs - Capacity Expansion for US Respiratory Protection — $125.4M (Department of Defense)
- 3M Respirator Masks - Multiple Locations - DPA Delivery Order #3 — $44.5M (Department of Homeland Security)
- TAS::17 1804::TAS 200508!000400!1700!n65538!naval SEA Logistics Center !gs35f4002g !C!N! !N!N6553805F0106! !20050128!20050331!006173082!006173082!006173082!N!3M Company !3M Center, Federal Systems!saint Paul !mn!55144!58010!137!27!saint Paul Church !ST. Louis !minnesota !+000003677699!n!n!000000000000!7030!adp Software !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipment !000 !* !443120!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B!E!Y! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !y!c!n!n! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !1700!N65538!0001! ! — $40.6M (Department of Defense)
- Covid-19 PPE Masks — $33.0M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)