Clark Construction Group awarded $30.8M for Miramar Brig construction, completed on time and within budget
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $30,857,337 ($30.9M)
Contractor: Clark Construction Group - California, LP
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-09-04
End Date: 2011-12-30
Contract Duration: 847 days
Daily Burn Rate: $36.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: P-790V CONSTRUCT AND ALTER MIRAMAR BRIG
Place of Performance
Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92145
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $30.9 million to CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP - CALIFORNIA, LP for work described as: P-790V CONSTRUCT AND ALTER MIRAMAR BRIG Key points: 1. Contract achieved its objectives with no reported cost overruns. 2. The project was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type likely mitigated cost escalation risks for the government. 4. The contractor, Clark Construction Group, has a significant track record in large-scale construction projects. 5. The project's completion within the scheduled timeframe indicates effective project management. 6. The contract was awarded to a single entity, suggesting a focus on specialized construction capabilities.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The final award amount of $30.8 million appears reasonable for a large-scale construction project of this nature. Benchmarking against similar military construction projects would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the absence of cost overruns and completion within the original schedule are positive indicators of efficient resource utilization and contractor performance. The firm-fixed-price contract structure also suggests that the initial pricing was deemed competitive and acceptable.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 5 bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this significant construction project. This competitive environment likely contributed to achieving a fair market price and ensuring the selection of a qualified contractor capable of meeting the project's requirements.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically drives down costs through competitive bidding and encourages a wider pool of contractors to participate, potentially leading to better value.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Navy and military personnel stationed at Miramar, who will utilize the new brig facility. The project delivered a new brig facility, enhancing security and detention capabilities at the naval base. The geographic impact is localized to Marine Corps Air Station Miramar in San Diego, California. The construction activities likely involved a significant local workforce, including skilled trades and laborers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurred, though not evident in final costs.
- Dependence on a single large contractor for critical infrastructure development.
- Risk of delays if unforeseen site conditions or material shortages arose.
Positive Signals
- Successful completion within budget and schedule indicates strong project management.
- Firm-fixed-price contract limits financial risk for the government.
- Award through full and open competition suggests a competitive and fair pricing structure.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction. The market for large-scale government construction projects, particularly for military installations, is substantial. This project represents a typical investment in maintaining and upgrading critical infrastructure for defense purposes. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other military construction contracts for similar facilities.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned. The award went to a large prime contractor, Clark Construction Group. While large projects can sometimes offer subcontracting opportunities, the absence of explicit set-asides suggests that small businesses may not have been a primary focus for this specific contract's structure.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this project would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and engineering divisions. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified facility within the agreed-upon cost and timeline. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and public reporting, though specific oversight reports for this individual project may not be readily available.
Related Government Programs
- Military Construction
- Naval Facilities Engineering Command Projects
- Correctional Facility Construction
- Department of Defense Infrastructure
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns (mitigated by fixed-price contract)
- Schedule delays (mitigated by on-time completion)
- Contractor performance risk (mitigated by successful completion)
Tags
construction, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, large-contract, california, miramar, brig-facility, military-infrastructure
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $30.9 million to CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP - CALIFORNIA, LP. P-790V CONSTRUCT AND ALTER MIRAMAR BRIG
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP - CALIFORNIA, LP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $30.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-09-04. End: 2011-12-30.
What was the original estimated cost of the project, and how did the final award amount compare?
The provided data does not include the original estimated cost of the project. It only states the final award amount of $30,857,336.53. To assess the value and efficiency of the procurement, a comparison between the initial estimate and the final award would be necessary. Without the estimate, it's difficult to determine if the final price was significantly higher or lower than anticipated, or if there were substantial changes during the bidding process.
What specific types of construction challenges were encountered during the project, if any?
The provided data does not detail any specific construction challenges encountered during the execution of the Miramar Brig project. However, large-scale construction projects, especially those involving correctional facilities, can often face challenges such as unforeseen site conditions, complex security requirements, material procurement delays, or coordination issues with base operations. The successful completion within the scheduled duration and budget suggests that any challenges were effectively managed by Clark Construction Group.
How does the cost per square foot of this brig compare to similar facilities built for the military or other government agencies?
The provided data does not include the square footage of the Miramar Brig, making a cost per square foot comparison impossible. To benchmark this contract effectively, information on the facility's size would be required. Generally, the cost per square foot for correctional facilities can vary widely based on security features, materials, and location. A detailed analysis would necessitate obtaining architectural plans or facility specifications to determine the total area.
What is Clark Construction Group's track record with similar Department of Defense construction contracts?
Clark Construction Group has a substantial track record with large-scale construction projects, including numerous contracts with the Department of Defense. They are known for undertaking complex infrastructure, healthcare, and institutional facilities. While specific details of their past DoD projects are not provided here, their involvement in a project like the Miramar Brig suggests they possess the experience and capacity to handle significant government construction requirements. Their portfolio often includes high-security and specialized facilities.
Were there any significant changes in scope or contract modifications after the initial award?
The provided data does not indicate any significant changes in scope or contract modifications after the initial award. The contract was awarded on September 4, 2009, and completed on December 30, 2011, with a final award amount of $30,857,336.53. The duration of 847 days (approximately 2.3 years) and the fixed-price nature of the contract suggest a well-defined scope from the outset. Without access to contract modification logs, it's impossible to definitively rule out minor adjustments, but no major scope changes are apparent from the summary data.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP
Solicitation ID: N6247309R1808
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Clark Enterprises, Inc. (UEI: 064862345)
Address: 575 ANTON BLVD, COSTA MESA, CA, 47
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $30,857,337
Exercised Options: $30,857,337
Current Obligation: $30,857,337
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-09-04
Current End Date: 2011-12-30
Potential End Date: 2011-12-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-12-13
More Contracts from Clark Construction Group - California, LP
- Design/Build Construction of United States Courthouse in Downtown LOS Angeles Consists of 10 Above Ground Levels of Courtroom Floors, Chambers, Offices, a Ground Level Lobby, and Below Grade Level Parking Encompassing Approx 600,000 Igf::ot::igf for Other Functions — $345.3M (General Services Administration)
- P-351 F-35C Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, NAS Lemoore, CA — $180.8M (Department of Defense)
- PE2549M, PE2548M, PE2546M, PE2547M, PE2544M, Repair Beqs AT Horno, 53 Area MCB Camp Pendleton SEE Page 2 — $135.8M (Department of Defense)
- P025-MQ 25 Squadron Hangar AT Nbvc — $107.0M (Department of Defense)
- Design-Bid-Build Task Order for P-314 Recruit Barracks on Marine Corps Recruit Depot in SAN Diego, CA — $47.7M (Department of Defense)
View all Clark Construction Group - California, LP federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)