SEACORP, LLC awarded $10.9M in engineering services by Defense Contract Management Agency
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,904,862 ($10.9M)
Contractor: Seacorp, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2006-10-01
End Date: 2024-01-25
Contract Duration: 6,325 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: N00178-04-D-4122-N414
Place of Performance
Location: WOBURN, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01801
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $10.9 million to SEACORP, LLC for work described as: N00178-04-D-4122-N414 Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the contract type and duration. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services. 3. Contract duration and type may present some performance risks. 4. This contract supports critical defense engineering functions. 5. The award falls within the expected range for engineering services in the defense sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract type, Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF), allows for flexibility while incentivizing performance. Benchmarking against similar engineering services contracts within the Department of Defense suggests the pricing is competitive. The total award amount of $10.9 million over its extended period indicates a moderate investment for specialized engineering support.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This process generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government receives competitive offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the competition type suggests a robust market.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it drives down costs through market forces, ensuring that federal dollars are used efficiently.
Public Impact
Benefits the Department of Defense by providing essential engineering services. Services delivered likely include design, analysis, and technical support for defense systems. Geographic impact is likely concentrated around defense installations or agency offices. Workforce implications include employment for skilled engineers and technical staff.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration could lead to scope creep or evolving requirements.
- CPAF contract type requires careful monitoring to ensure award fees are justified.
- Reliance on a single awardee for a significant period may limit future market options.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition indicates a competitive market and potentially better pricing.
- The contract has been active for a considerable period, suggesting a stable relationship and consistent need.
- Award fee structure incentivizes contractor performance.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader professional services market supporting government operations. The defense industry, in particular, relies heavily on specialized engineering firms for the development, maintenance, and modernization of complex systems. Spending in this area is substantial, with numerous contracts awarded annually to support national security objectives.
Small Business Impact
Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans is not available for this specific award. However, given the nature of specialized engineering services, larger prime contractors often engage small businesses for niche expertise or specific components of larger projects.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight is likely managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), responsible for ensuring contract compliance and performance. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Defense Engineering Services
- Professional Services Contracts
- Cost Plus Award Fee Contracts
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may indicate evolving requirements or potential for scope creep.
Tags
defense, engineering-services, department-of-defense, delivery-order, cost-plus-award-fee, full-and-open-competition, seacorp-llc, massachusetts, professional-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $10.9 million to SEACORP, LLC. N00178-04-D-4122-N414
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SEACORP, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-10-01. End: 2024-01-25.
What is the historical spending trend for SEACORP, LLC with the Department of Defense?
Analyzing SEACORP, LLC's historical spending with the Department of Defense requires access to comprehensive contract databases. However, this specific award, N00178-04-D-4122-N414, valued at $10.9 million, indicates a sustained relationship. Further investigation into past awards would reveal if this is a consistent level of engagement or a significant increase/decrease, providing context on the company's role and performance within the DoD ecosystem. Trends could show growth, stability, or shifts in service areas, impacting future budget projections and contractor viability assessments.
How does the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure impact the value for money in this contract?
The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure aims to balance cost control with performance incentives. For this $10.9 million engineering services contract, the government pays the contractor's allowable costs plus a base fee, with the potential for an award fee based on performance against defined criteria. This structure can drive better outcomes and innovation compared to fixed-price contracts, especially for complex services where performance is hard to define upfront. However, it requires robust government oversight to ensure award fees are justified and that costs remain reasonable. The value for money is realized if the enhanced performance achieved through the award fee significantly outweighs any potential for cost overruns or inflated fees due to inadequate oversight.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) typically associated with engineering services contracts like this one?
For engineering services contracts such as this $10.9 million award to SEACORP, LLC, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) often revolve around technical accuracy, adherence to project schedules, cost control, innovation, and client satisfaction. Specific KPIs might include the timely delivery of design documents, the accuracy of engineering analyses, the successful resolution of technical challenges, compliance with safety and regulatory standards, and the effective management of subcontractors. For a CPAF contract, these KPIs are crucial for determining the award fee, directly linking contractor performance to financial incentives and ensuring the government receives high-quality, value-driven services.
What is the typical duration and value range for similar engineering services contracts within the Department of Defense?
Engineering services contracts within the Department of Defense can vary significantly in duration and value, depending on the complexity and scope of the project. Contracts can range from short-term, specialized support to multi-year, comprehensive engineering solutions. The $10.9 million total award for SEACORP, LLC, with a duration extending over several years, appears to be within a moderate range for significant engineering support. However, larger, more complex projects, such as major system design or infrastructure development, can easily reach hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars and span a decade or more. Benchmarking requires detailed analysis of specific service categories and project scales.
Are there any known performance issues or contractor disputes associated with SEACORP, LLC on previous DoD contracts?
Assessing specific performance issues or contractor disputes for SEACORP, LLC requires a deep dive into contract performance reports, past performance reviews, and any formal dispute resolution records. Publicly available data for this $10.9 million award does not immediately flag significant issues. However, the long duration of this contract (from 2006 to 2024) suggests a generally stable relationship, though it does not preclude past challenges. A thorough review would involve checking contract databases for performance ratings, any claims filed, or contract terminations, which are critical for understanding the contractor's reliability and risk profile.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: N0002406R3609
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 62 JOHNNY CAKE HILL RD, MIDDLETOWN, RI, 02842
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $14,260,957
Exercised Options: $14,260,957
Current Obligation: $10,904,862
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4122
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-10-01
Current End Date: 2024-01-25
Potential End Date: 2024-01-25 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-01-25
More Contracts from Seacorp, LLC
- Code 34 Support TAS::97 0100::TAS — $121.1M (Department of Defense)
- Code 34 Technical Support Igf::ot::igf — $86.4M (Department of Defense)
- Conform Platform Engineering, Advanced System Engineering, Technical, and Test and Evaluation Services for Development, Evaluation, Modernization, and Sustainment of the U.S. Navy and Royal Australian Navy Submarine Platforms — $69.7M (Department of Defense)
- Electromagnetic Maneuver Warfare Modular Suite (emwms) — $59.8M (Department of Defense)
- Strike Engineering and Tech. Support Services (code 25) — $57.0M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)