DoD's Amentum Services Inc. awarded $16.3M for facilities support in DC, extending contract through March 2025
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,335,328 ($16.3M)
Contractor: Amentum Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-04-01
End Date: 2025-03-31
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $44.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: PWD WASHINGTON RBOS TASK ORDER, OPTION YEAR 4 (OY4) POP: 4/1/2024
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20374
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.3 million to AMENTUM SERVICES, INC. for work described as: PWD WASHINGTON RBOS TASK ORDER, OPTION YEAR 4 (OY4) POP: 4/1/2024 Key points: 1. The contract represents a significant investment in maintaining critical infrastructure for the Department of the Navy. 2. Competition dynamics for this task order were full and open, suggesting a potentially competitive pricing environment. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type generally shifts performance risk to the contractor. 4. This award is an option year exercise, indicating a continuation of services rather than a new requirement. 5. The duration of the current period is approximately one year, aligning with typical service contract cycles. 6. Facilities support services are essential for the operational readiness of military installations.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The awarded amount of $16.3 million for one year of facilities support services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities maintenance contracts for federal agencies suggests that pricing is competitive, especially considering the firm-fixed-price nature which includes contractor assumption of risk. Without specific line-item details, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the overall award size is within expected ranges for this type of service.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the competitive nature suggests that the Department of the Navy sought the best value through a robust bidding process. This approach generally leads to more favorable pricing and service offerings for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it drives down costs through market forces and encourages a wider pool of qualified contractors to vie for government work, ensuring efficient use of public funds.
Public Impact
The Department of the Navy benefits from reliable and comprehensive facilities support services, ensuring operational readiness. Personnel working at the supported facilities will experience improved infrastructure and maintenance. The contract's impact is primarily concentrated in the District of Columbia, supporting federal operations. Amentum Services, Inc. will utilize its workforce to deliver these essential services, potentially creating or sustaining jobs.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly, leading to cost overruns beyond the current option year.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical facilities maintenance could pose a risk if performance degrades.
- Ensuring consistent service quality across all aspects of facilities support requires diligent oversight.
Positive Signals
- The firm-fixed-price contract type incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost control.
- Awarding an option year suggests satisfaction with previous performance and service continuity.
- Full and open competition generally leads to better pricing and service quality.
Sector Analysis
Facilities support services encompass a broad range of activities including maintenance, repair, operations, and management of physical infrastructure. This sector is critical for government operations, ensuring that buildings and grounds are functional, safe, and well-maintained. Spending in this area is consistent across many federal agencies, with significant annual outlays for maintaining government property. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without granular detail, but the $16.3 million for one year reflects a substantial contract for a major facility or complex.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. However, the prime contractor, Amentum Services, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill portions of the work, depending on their own subcontracting plans and the nature of the services required. Analysis of Amentum's subcontracting history would be needed to determine the specific impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are embedded within the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring Amentum Services, Inc. to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- Base Operations Support (BOS)
- Facilities Engineering and Maintenance Services
- Real Property Management
- Logistics and Support Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for service quality degradation over time.
- Risk of unforeseen infrastructure failures requiring extensive repairs.
- Contractor performance issues impacting operational readiness.
- Ensuring compliance with evolving safety and environmental regulations.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, facilities-support-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, option-year, district-of-columbia, large-contract, service-contract, infrastructure-maintenance
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.3 million to AMENTUM SERVICES, INC.. PWD WASHINGTON RBOS TASK ORDER, OPTION YEAR 4 (OY4) POP: 4/1/2024
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMENTUM SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-04-01. End: 2025-03-31.
What is Amentum Services, Inc.'s track record with federal facilities support contracts?
Amentum Services, Inc. has a significant history of performing large-scale facilities support and base operations services for various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and Department of Energy. Their experience often involves managing complex infrastructure, maintenance, repair, and operational services across multiple locations. Reviewing past performance evaluations and contract histories can provide insight into their reliability, quality of service, and ability to manage large budgets and diverse teams. Specific to this contract, the exercise of an option year suggests a positive prior performance assessment by the Department of the Navy, indicating a level of satisfaction with their service delivery in previous periods.
How does the $16.3 million annual cost compare to similar facilities support contracts?
The $16.3 million annual cost for facilities support services is substantial and aligns with contracts for managing significant government installations or complexes. To benchmark effectively, one would compare this figure against contracts for similar scope, geographic location, and service complexity. For instance, other Department of Defense or civilian agency contracts for base operations support or comprehensive facilities maintenance in major metropolitan areas often fall within a similar multi-million dollar range annually. Factors like the specific services included (e.g., custodial, groundskeeping, HVAC, electrical, plumbing, minor repairs) and the square footage or number of facilities managed heavily influence the cost. The firm-fixed-price nature also implies that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a factor in pricing.
What are the primary risks associated with this facilities support contract?
Key risks for this facilities support contract include potential degradation of service quality over time if not rigorously monitored, contractor underperformance in critical maintenance areas, and unforeseen infrastructure failures that may exceed the scope of routine maintenance. There's also a risk of scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and managed, potentially leading to disputes or additional costs if not handled within the contract's framework. Dependence on a single contractor for essential services can pose operational risks if the contractor faces financial instability or significant staffing issues. Furthermore, ensuring compliance with evolving environmental, safety, and security regulations adds another layer of complexity and potential risk.
How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money in facilities support?
The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money for services like facilities support because it places the primary financial risk on the contractor. Under an FFP agreement, the contractor is obligated to perform the specified services for a predetermined price, regardless of their actual costs. This incentivizes the contractor to be efficient, control costs, and manage resources effectively to maximize their profit margin. For the government, it provides cost certainty, as the total price is known upfront. However, the effectiveness hinges on a well-defined scope of work; if the scope is ambiguous, it can lead to disputes or the contractor cutting corners to maintain profitability, potentially impacting service quality. Robust performance monitoring is still crucial to ensure the government receives the full value of the services contracted.
What is the historical spending trend for facilities support services by the Department of the Navy?
Historical spending by the Department of the Navy (DoN) on facilities support services has consistently been substantial, reflecting the vast real estate portfolio and operational requirements of the naval services. The DoN manages numerous shore installations, bases, and facilities worldwide, necessitating significant investment in their upkeep, maintenance, and operational readiness. Spending in this category typically fluctuates based on infrastructure modernization needs, repair backlogs, and the number and size of installations. Option year exercises, like the one awarded to Amentum Services, Inc., are common and indicate a pattern of extending existing contracts rather than initiating new, large-scale procurements annually. Overall, facilities support represents a core and ongoing expenditure for the DoN, crucial for maintaining its global presence and operational capabilities.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N6247017R4001
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: PAE Government Services Inc.
Address: 20501 SENECA MEADOWS PKWY, GERMANTOWN, MD, 20876
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $16,335,328
Exercised Options: $16,335,328
Current Obligation: $16,335,328
Actual Outlays: $11,629
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N6247019D2013
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-04-01
Current End Date: 2025-03-31
Potential End Date: 2025-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-30
More Contracts from Amentum Services, Inc.
- Logcap IV Services in Afghanistan — $7.4B (Department of Defense)
- KSC Institutional Services Contract (ISC) — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Enhanced Army Global Logistics Enterprise (eagle) - Army Prepositioned Stock (APS)-5 Kuwait/Qatar, Logistics Support Services, Including Maintenance, Supply, and Transportation — $1.3B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- Contract Award for Contractor Logistics Support (CLS), Also Referred to AS Life Cycle Services, for the Government-Owned Fixed Wing Fleets Performing Transport Aircraft (TA) Missions, Currently Compromised of Small Weight Class Aircraft Models, Using Full and Open Competitive, Best Value Procedures With Formal Source Selection — $962.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)