DoD's $58.4M Engineering Services Contract Awarded to AMERESCO INC Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $58,414,724 ($58.4M)
Contractor: Ameresco Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-12-28
End Date: 2041-11-30
Contract Duration: 9,103 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Engineering Services
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF PERFORMANCE PERIOD SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: PARRIS ISLAND, BEAUFORT County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29905
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $58.4 million to AMERESCO INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF PERFORMANCE PERIOD SERVICES Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $58.4 million for engineering services. 2. AMERESCO INC secured the award through full and open competition. 3. Long performance period (2016-2041) suggests a need for sustained engineering support. 4. The contract is firm fixed price, providing cost certainty for the government. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541330 indicates a focus on engineering services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $58.4 million for engineering services appears reasonable given the long performance period and the nature of the services. Benchmarking against similar long-term engineering support contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust process for soliciting bids and ensuring fair market pricing. This method typically leads to competitive pricing as multiple vendors have the opportunity to propose their best offers.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces, ensuring the government receives competitive pricing for essential engineering services.
Public Impact
Taxpayers benefit from competitive bidding for engineering services. Long-term contract ensures continuity of essential engineering support for the Department of the Navy. The firm fixed price structure provides budget predictability for the Department of Defense.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (over 20 years) may require periodic review to ensure continued relevance and cost-effectiveness.
- Potential for scope creep over such an extended period.
- Reliance on a single awardee for a significant duration.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Firm fixed price contract provides cost certainty.
- Long performance period ensures sustained support.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is crucial for government infrastructure and defense projects. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on national priorities and infrastructure needs. The value of this contract is substantial for engineering services.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation in this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
The firm fixed price contract and full and open competition suggest a degree of oversight in the initial award. Ongoing oversight would be necessary to manage performance and ensure adherence to contract terms over its long duration.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration (over 20 years).
- Potential for scope creep over an extended period.
- Limited visibility into specific services and their ongoing relevance.
- Reliance on a single awardee for a significant duration.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, sc, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $58.4 million to AMERESCO INC. IGF::OT::IGF PERFORMANCE PERIOD SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMERESCO INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $58.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-12-28. End: 2041-11-30.
What specific engineering services are covered under this contract, and how do they align with the Department of the Navy's long-term strategic goals?
The contract specifies 'IGF::OT::IGF PERFORMANCE PERIOD SERVICES' under NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services). While the exact scope isn't detailed here, it likely encompasses a broad range of engineering support critical for naval operations, infrastructure maintenance, or system development. Its alignment with strategic goals would depend on the specific projects undertaken and the Navy's evolving technological and operational requirements over the contract's extensive lifespan.
Given the 25-year performance period, what mechanisms are in place to manage potential cost increases or ensure the services remain relevant and cost-effective over time?
The contract is firm fixed price, which provides significant cost certainty for the government upfront. However, over a 25-year period, mechanisms like periodic reviews, potential contract modifications for scope changes, and performance-based incentives would be crucial to ensure continued relevance and cost-effectiveness. The government should actively monitor technological advancements and operational needs to adapt the contract as necessary.
How was the benchmark pricing established for this long-term engineering services contract to ensure it represents fair value to the taxpayer?
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which is a primary mechanism for establishing benchmark pricing. This process allows multiple qualified vendors to submit bids, driving competition and theoretically leading to prices that reflect fair market value. The government likely used historical data, cost-plus-fixed-fee estimates, or other cost-analysis techniques during the solicitation phase to validate the competitiveness of the received bids.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 111 SPEEN ST STE 410, FRAMINGHAM, MA, 01701
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $212,716,674
Exercised Options: $212,716,674
Current Obligation: $58,414,724
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DEAM3609GO29029
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-12-28
Current End Date: 2041-11-30
Potential End Date: 2041-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-05-06
More Contracts from Ameresco Inc
- Energy Savings Performance Contract, National Deep Energy Retrofit Program Round 7, Region 5 for Implementation of Energy Conservation Measures AT the Bean Federal Center, Indianapolis and 24 Other Buildings Indiana, Illinois, Minnesota and Wisconsin — $217.3M (General Services Administration)
- Energy Savings Performance Contract, National Deep Energy Retrofit Program Round 6, Region 8 for Implementation of Energy Conservation Measures AT the Denver Federal Center and the US Courthouse in Downtown Denver — $111.9M (General Services Administration)
- Veterans Integrated Service Network (visn) 7 Energy Savings Performance Contract (espc) — $94.7M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Butner Espc — $80.7M (Department of Justice)
- Energy Savings Performance Contract for Norfolk Naval Ship Yard, Portsmouth, Virginia — $74.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)