DoD's $27.5M Engineering Services Contract with SMARTRONIX, LLC Awarded via Not Competed Method

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,473,247 ($27.5M)

Contractor: Smartronix, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2017-02-01

End Date: 2018-07-31

Contract Duration: 545 days

Daily Burn Rate: $50.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: SAINT INIGOES, SAINT MARYS County, MARYLAND, 20684

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $27.5 million to SMARTRONIX, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract Value: $27.5 million for engineering services. 2. Sole Provider: SMARTRONIX, LLC is the sole provider for this contract. 3. Risk: Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and limited innovation. 4. Sector: Engineering services within the Department of Defense.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to higher costs if not managed closely. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to benchmark pricing against similar services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was awarded using a sole-source method, indicating no competition. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for a $27.5 million contract may result in inefficient use of taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. Limited transparency into the justification for a sole-source award. Potential for reduced innovation and service quality without market pressure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under engineering services, a critical sector for defense operations. Benchmarks for similar sole-source engineering contracts are often higher due to the lack of competition.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business, representing a missed opportunity for small business participation in defense contracting.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial for sole-source contracts to ensure fair pricing and prevent waste. The justification for the sole-source award needs thorough review.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, md, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $27.5 million to SMARTRONIX, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SMARTRONIX, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-02-01. End: 2018-07-31.

What was the specific justification for awarding this engineering services contract on a sole-source basis, and was it adequately documented?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of other qualified sources. Without access to the specific documentation, it's impossible to verify the adequacy of the justification. However, sole-source awards inherently reduce competitive pressure, making robust justification and oversight essential to ensure fair pricing and value for taxpayer money.

How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure impact the overall cost-effectiveness of this contract compared to a fixed-price or other contract types?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts offer flexibility but can incentivize higher spending as the contractor is reimbursed for costs plus a fixed fee. This contrasts with fixed-price contracts, where the contractor bears more risk for cost overruns. In a sole-source scenario, the lack of competition exacerbates this risk, potentially leading to inflated costs that a competitive bidding process might have mitigated.

What mechanisms are in place to ensure the quality and effectiveness of the engineering services provided under this sole-source contract?

Ensuring quality and effectiveness in sole-source contracts relies heavily on strong government oversight, clear performance metrics, and defined deliverables. The Department of the Navy would typically establish quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs) and conduct regular performance reviews. However, the absence of competitive pressure means the government must be particularly diligent in monitoring contractor performance to ensure value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Smartronix LLC

Address: 44150 SMARTRONIX WAY, HOLLYWOOD, MD, 20636

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,949,529

Exercised Options: $29,949,529

Current Obligation: $27,473,247

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 61

Total Subaward Amount: $7,975,222

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2017-02-01

Current End Date: 2018-07-31

Potential End Date: 2018-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-12-27

More Contracts from Smartronix, LLC

View all Smartronix, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending