CACI, INC. - FEDERAL awarded $18.6M for administrative management consulting services to the Department of the Navy

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,606,737 ($18.6M)

Contractor: CACI, Inc. - Federal

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-11-01

End Date: 2008-04-30

Contract Duration: 181 days

Daily Burn Rate: $102.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF NAE (BASE PERIOD)

Place of Performance

Location: PATUXENT RIVER, ST. MARY'S County, MARYLAND, 20670

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.6 million to CACI, INC. - FEDERAL for work described as: SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF NAE (BASE PERIOD) Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting price competition. 2. Services provided are administrative management and general management consulting. 3. Contract duration was approximately 6 months. 4. The contract was awarded to a single vendor, CACI, INC. - FEDERAL. 5. The contract value is within a typical range for consulting services of this nature. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized for this contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $18.6 million for a 6-month period suggests a significant monthly expenditure for consulting services. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, it is difficult to benchmark the value for money. However, the absence of competition likely prevented a more competitive pricing structure. Compared to similar sole-source contracts for management consulting, the price may be reasonable if the scope of work was extensive and specialized, but transparency is limited.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when only one vendor possesses the necessary specialized skills, or in urgent situations. The lack of competition means that taxpayers did not benefit from a potentially lower price that could have been achieved through a competitive bidding process.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can lead to higher costs for taxpayers as they bypass the price discovery mechanisms inherent in competitive procurement. This limits the government's ability to secure the best possible value.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy benefits from administrative and management consulting expertise. Services likely support the operational efficiency and strategic planning of naval operations. The geographic impact is primarily within the contractor's operational area, likely Maryland. Workforce implications are minimal as this is a service contract, not a large-scale project requiring significant new hires.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and potentially increases cost to taxpayers.
Lack of transparency in the justification for sole-source award.
Limited performance data available to assess the effectiveness of the consulting services.

Positive Signals

Contract awarded to an established federal contractor, CACI, INC. - FEDERAL.
Services provided are essential for administrative and management functions within the DoD.
Firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.

Sector Analysis

The administrative management and general management consulting services sector is a significant part of the federal procurement landscape, supporting various government functions. This contract falls within the professional services category, which is characterized by a wide range of specialized expertise. Benchmarking this specific contract is challenging without detailed scope of work, but the overall federal spending on management consulting is substantial, often in the billions annually.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have significant subcontracting requirements for small businesses based on the available data. The award to a large federal contractor like CACI, INC. - FEDERAL suggests that the primary focus was on specialized capabilities rather than small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. As a sole-source award, the justification and approval process would be subject to specific federal acquisition regulations. Transparency is limited due to the non-competitive nature, and further oversight details would require access to the contract file and any associated Inspector General reports.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Consulting Services
Administrative Management Services
General Management Consulting

Risk Flags

Sole-source award may indicate lack of competition, potentially leading to higher costs.
Limited public information on specific services and performance outcomes.
Contract duration is relatively short, suggesting a specific, potentially time-bound need.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.6 million to CACI, INC. - FEDERAL. SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF NAE (BASE PERIOD)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI, INC. - FEDERAL.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-11-01. End: 2008-04-30.

What specific administrative and management consulting services were provided under this contract?

The contract data indicates the services fall under NAICS code 541611, 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.' This broad category can encompass a wide range of activities, including strategic planning, organizational analysis, process improvement, human capital management, and operational efficiency enhancements. Without access to the detailed Statement of Work (SOW) or contract modifications, the precise nature of the services rendered by CACI, INC. - FEDERAL to the Department of the Navy remains unspecified. These services are crucial for supporting the complex administrative and management needs of a large military branch like the Navy.

What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

Sole-source awards are typically justified when only one responsible source is available or capable of providing the required services. Common reasons include unique capabilities, proprietary technology, urgent and compelling needs where competition is not feasible, or when a specific contractor has been designated as the sole provider by statute or regulation. For this contract, the justification would likely stem from CACI, INC. - FEDERAL possessing specialized expertise or a pre-existing relationship that made them the only viable option for the Department of the Navy at the time of award. A detailed justification document, usually found in the contract file, would outline the specific rationale.

How does the $18.6 million contract value compare to similar consulting contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy?

The $18.6 million contract value for approximately six months of administrative and management consulting services represents a significant investment. To benchmark this, one would need to compare it against other sole-source or competed contracts for similar services (NAICS 541611) awarded by the Department of the Navy or other Department of Defense agencies during a comparable timeframe. Factors such as the scope of work, duration, level of expertise required, and the number of personnel involved would be critical for a fair comparison. Given the sole-source nature, it's possible this value reflects a premium due to lack of competition, or it could be justified by highly specialized, mission-critical support.

What is CACI, INC. - FEDERAL's track record with the Department of the Navy and other federal agencies?

CACI, INC. - FEDERAL is a well-established federal contractor with a substantial history of providing IT, consulting, and support services across various government agencies, including the Department of Defense. Their track record with the Department of the Navy is extensive, often involving large-scale contracts for systems integration, IT modernization, and professional services. Analyzing their past performance ratings, contract awards, and any past performance issues would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and capability in delivering services similar to those under this contract. Generally, CACI is considered a major player in the federal contracting space.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for consulting services?

The primary risk associated with sole-source awards is the potential for inflated pricing due to the absence of competitive pressure. This can lead to reduced value for taxpayer money. Other risks include a lack of innovation that might arise from multiple vendors proposing different solutions, and potential vendor lock-in, where the agency becomes overly reliant on a single provider. Furthermore, without a competitive process, there's a reduced opportunity to identify and mitigate risks associated with the contractor's performance or financial stability. Oversight becomes even more critical to ensure the government receives adequate value.

What performance metrics or deliverables were likely included in this contract to ensure accountability?

While the specific deliverables are not detailed in the provided data, firm-fixed-price contracts for consulting services typically include defined milestones, reports, analyses, or recommendations as key deliverables. Performance metrics might focus on the timeliness of these deliverables, the quality of the work product (e.g., clarity of analysis, actionable recommendations), and adherence to project management standards. The Department of the Navy would have established mechanisms for reviewing and accepting these deliverables, and potentially for withholding payment or exercising contract remedies if performance fell short. The effectiveness of these metrics is crucial for ensuring accountability, especially in sole-source situations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0042107R0085

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc (UEI: 045534641)

Address: 14151 PARK MEADOW DR, CHANTILLY, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,606,737

Exercised Options: $18,606,737

Current Obligation: $18,606,737

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline