DoD's $24M contract for surface ship maintenance engineering awarded to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,957,626 ($24.0M)
Contractor: Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-06-21
End Date: 2029-06-20
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: TECHNICAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES TO CENTRALIZE SURFACE SHIP LIFE CYCLE MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING AND CLASS MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS.
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20003
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $24.0 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: TECHNICAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES TO CENTRALIZE SURFACE SHIP LIFE CYCLE MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING AND CLASS MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Key points: 1. Contract aims to centralize life cycle maintenance engineering and class maintenance planning. 2. Focus on improving efficiency and standardization in surface ship maintenance. 3. Potential for long-term cost savings through optimized planning. 4. Performance period spans five years, indicating a significant commitment. 5. Contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can incentivize cost control. 6. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $24 million over five years for centralized surface ship maintenance engineering appears reasonable given the scope. While specific benchmarks for this niche service are difficult to ascertain without more granular data, the fixed fee component of the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract structure suggests an effort to control overall costs. Comparing this to similar large-scale engineering support contracts within the Department of Defense would provide a clearer picture of value for money, but the duration and complexity of managing maintenance for an entire class of ships justify a substantial investment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of four bidders suggests a healthy level of competition for this specialized engineering service. A competitive process like this generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government receives proposals from a range of capable contractors, potentially driving innovation and efficiency.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive award process that is expected to yield a fair price for essential maintenance engineering services, preventing potential overcharges associated with less competitive solicitations.
Public Impact
The U.S. Navy's surface ship fleet will benefit from standardized and efficient maintenance planning. Improved readiness and operational availability of naval vessels. Supports the technical and engineering workforce involved in naval maintenance. Ensures the long-term sustainability and cost-effectiveness of ship maintenance programs. Geographic impact is broad, covering all surface ships managed by the Navy.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical maintenance planning could pose a risk if performance falters.
- The complexity of integrating life cycle maintenance across diverse ship classes presents inherent challenges.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
- The five-year duration suggests a stable, long-term partnership focused on sustained improvement.
- Centralizing maintenance planning can lead to significant efficiencies and cost savings over time.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting the defense industry's complex needs for naval vessel maintenance. The market for specialized defense engineering services is characterized by high barriers to entry due to security clearances, technical expertise, and established relationships. The total addressable market for such services is substantial, driven by ongoing defense modernization and sustainment efforts. This contract represents a significant portion of spending dedicated to ensuring the operational readiness of the U.S. Navy's surface fleet.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the prime contractor, MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC., is likely a large business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award notice. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation is mandated or encouraged through subcontracting opportunities, which could impact the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, requiring detailed reporting and justification of costs. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and public reporting, though specific performance metrics and detailed cost breakdowns may be considered sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Naval Ship Maintenance
- Life Cycle Management
- Engineering Support Services
- Defense Logistics and Sustainment
- Surface Warfare Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost creep in CPFF contracts if not rigorously managed.
- Dependency on a single contractor for critical fleet maintenance planning.
- Challenges in adapting centralized plans to diverse ship operational environments.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, engineering-services, maintenance-planning, life-cycle-management, surface-ship, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, large-contract, district-of-columbia
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $24.0 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. TECHNICAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES TO CENTRALIZE SURFACE SHIP LIFE CYCLE MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING AND CLASS MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-06-21. End: 2029-06-20.
What is the historical spending pattern for surface ship life cycle maintenance engineering by the Department of the Navy?
Analyzing historical spending for surface ship life cycle maintenance engineering by the Department of the Navy requires access to detailed budget and contract data over several fiscal years. Generally, this category of spending is substantial, reflecting the ongoing need to maintain a large and complex fleet. Spending can fluctuate based on fleet size, modernization initiatives, and the specific maintenance cycles of different ship classes. Contracts for such services are often long-term and awarded through competitive processes, but can also be subject to sole-source or limited competition awards for specialized or urgent needs. Understanding these patterns helps in benchmarking current contract values and identifying trends in investment in naval sustainment.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type typically perform in terms of cost control for engineering services?
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type is designed to provide flexibility for complex projects where the scope may evolve, while still offering some cost control. The contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs incurred, plus a predetermined fixed fee representing profit. This structure incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently to maximize their profit margin, as the fee remains constant regardless of the final cost. However, if not managed diligently, CPFF contracts can sometimes lead to cost overruns if the government does not effectively monitor the "cost" portion. For engineering services, it's often chosen when precise cost estimation is difficult upfront, balancing the need for contractor effort with taxpayer protection through the fixed fee.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) likely used to evaluate MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.'s performance on this contract?
Key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract would likely focus on the effectiveness and efficiency of the centralized maintenance engineering and planning. This could include metrics such as the accuracy and completeness of maintenance plans, the reduction in unscheduled maintenance events, improvements in ship availability and readiness rates, adherence to schedule for maintenance planning deliverables, and the cost-effectiveness of proposed maintenance strategies. Feedback from naval commands utilizing the planning services would also be crucial. The government will monitor these KPIs to ensure the contractor is meeting the objectives of centralizing and optimizing maintenance processes for the surface ship fleet.
What is the typical duration and value range for contracts related to naval ship maintenance engineering?
Contracts for naval ship maintenance engineering can vary significantly in duration and value, depending on the scope and complexity. Basic engineering support services might be awarded for one to three years with values in the single-digit millions. However, comprehensive life cycle maintenance planning and engineering for an entire class of vessels, like this contract, often involve longer durations, typically three to five years, and can range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. The $24 million value over five years for this specific contract appears to be within a reasonable range for a significant, specialized engineering support role focused on planning and management rather than direct repair execution.
What are the potential risks associated with centralizing surface ship life cycle maintenance planning?
Centralizing surface ship life cycle maintenance planning, while offering potential efficiencies, carries several risks. A primary risk is the potential for a single point of failure; if the central entity or contractor experiences performance issues, it could impact the maintenance schedules and readiness of the entire fleet. There's also a risk of losing institutional knowledge or specialized expertise if it's not effectively transferred and maintained within the centralized structure. Furthermore, adapting standardized plans to the unique operational needs and conditions of individual ships or squadrons can be challenging. Over-reliance on a single contractor could also reduce flexibility and responsiveness to unforeseen operational demands or technological changes.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: N0016423R3002
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Mantech International Corporation
Address: 2251 CORPORATE PARK DR STE 600, HERNDON, VA, 20171
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $73,211,980
Exercised Options: $70,073,476
Current Obligation: $23,957,626
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 6
Total Subaward Amount: $17,267,625
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017819D8070
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-06-21
Current End Date: 2029-06-20
Potential End Date: 2029-06-20 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-12
More Contracts from Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.
- Contractor Logistics Sustainment and Support (clss) Services for the Maintenance Repair and Supply Support for Route Clearance Vehicles (RCV), Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (mrap) Vehicles, and the United States Special Operations Command (ussocom) Vehicles (referred to AS the Mrap Family of Vehicles (FOV) of (mrap) Family of Vehicles (FOV) — $965.4M (Department of Defense)
- CLS Services: Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait — $960.1M (Department of Defense)
- Logistics' Services — $816.8M (Department of Defense)
- Award of Vehicle Engineering and Maintenance Operations (vemos) Task Order. Igf::ot::igf — $723.7M (General Services Administration)
- Alecs Task Order Award — $722.2M (General Services Administration)
View all Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)