DoD's $14.7M AN/KAX-1A Systems Contract Awarded to Teledyne FLIR Defense, Inc. with No Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,724,600 ($14.7M)

Contractor: Teledyne Flir Defense, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-06-25

End Date: 2009-12-24

Contract Duration: 547 days

Daily Burn Rate: $26.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: AN/KAX-1A SYSTEMS

Place of Performance

Location: NORTH BILLERICA, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01862

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $14.7 million to TELEDYNE FLIR DEFENSE, INC. for work described as: AN/KAX-1A SYSTEMS Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $14.7 million for specialized defense systems. 2. Sole-source award to Teledyne FLIR Defense, Inc. raises questions about competition. 3. Contract duration of 547 days suggests a focused, short-term project. 4. The 'Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance' category indicates critical operational equipment.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $14.7 million for AN/KAX-1A systems appears high given the lack of competitive bidding. Without a benchmark from competing offers, it's difficult to definitively assess if the pricing is optimal.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning there was no open competition. This significantly limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition in this sole-source award may result in taxpayers paying a premium for these defense systems.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for critical defense equipment due to the absence of competitive bidding. The Department of the Navy relies on this sole-source provider for essential navigation and guidance systems. Potential for reduced innovation and efficiency gains that often arise from competitive procurements.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the 'Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing' sector. Spending in this area is critical for national defense, but often involves specialized, high-cost equipment where competition can be limited.

Small Business Impact

The award went to Teledyne FLIR Defense, Inc., a large corporation, with no indication of small business subcontracting. This procurement does not appear to benefit small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny to ensure the Department of Defense obtained the best possible value. Further review of the justification for sole-sourcing is recommended.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

search-detection-navigation-guidance-aer, department-of-defense, ma, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $14.7 million to TELEDYNE FLIR DEFENSE, INC.. AN/KAX-1A SYSTEMS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TELEDYNE FLIR DEFENSE, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-06-25. End: 2009-12-24.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis instead of seeking competitive bids?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs where only one vendor can fulfill the requirement. Without specific documentation, it's impossible to confirm the exact reason, but it's crucial for ensuring fair pricing and exploring all viable options.

How does the $14.7 million price compare to similar systems procured competitively by other defense agencies?

Without access to specific competitive procurement data for comparable systems, a direct price comparison is challenging. However, the absence of competition for this $14.7 million award raises a red flag. Agencies should strive for competitive processes to ensure cost-effectiveness and benchmark pricing against market alternatives.

What is the long-term strategic impact of relying on a sole-source provider for these critical navigation and guidance systems?

Long-term reliance on a sole-source provider can stifle innovation, limit flexibility, and potentially lead to escalating costs over time. It also creates a single point of failure. Agencies should periodically reassess sole-source justifications and explore opportunities to introduce competition or develop alternative solutions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingNavigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments ManufacturingSearch, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0016408RJQ43

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Teledyne Flir, LLC (UEI: 091296244)

Address: 25 ESQUIRE RD, NORTH BILLERICA, MA, 01862

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,724,600

Exercised Options: $14,724,600

Current Obligation: $14,724,600

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-06-25

Current End Date: 2009-12-24

Potential End Date: 2009-12-24 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-04-21

More Contracts from Teledyne Flir Defense, Inc.

View all Teledyne Flir Defense, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending