DoD awards $29.6M for acquisition and logistics support, with CSA Global LLC as prime

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,581,489 ($29.6M)

Contractor: CSA Global LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2017-02-13

End Date: 2022-06-12

Contract Duration: 1,945 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF ACQUISITION, PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, AND LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR PMW 770.

Place of Performance

Location: MECHANICSBURG, CUMBERLAND County, PENNSYLVANIA, 17055

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.6 million to CSA GLOBAL LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF ACQUISITION, PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, AND LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR PMW 770. Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in program management and logistics. 2. The full and open competition suggests a robust market for these services. 3. Performance period spans over 5 years, indicating a long-term need. 4. The contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) may present cost control challenges. 5. Engineering services are critical for complex defense programs. 6. The award was made by the Defense Contract Management Agency. 7. The contract is categorized under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific deliverables. However, the duration and scope suggest a substantial investment. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can sometimes lead to higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not managed carefully, as it allows the contractor to recover all allowable costs plus a fixed fee. Further analysis would require comparing specific task orders and their associated costs against industry benchmarks for similar program management and logistics support.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a competitive environment, which generally benefits price discovery and can lead to more favorable terms for the government. The level of competition is a positive sign for ensuring a fair market price.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and improves service quality.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from enhanced acquisition and program management capabilities. Services delivered include logistics support, crucial for operational readiness. The contract's geographic impact is likely national, supporting various DoD initiatives. Workforce implications include employment for professionals in program management, logistics, and engineering.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure requires diligent oversight to manage costs effectively.
Long performance period necessitates ongoing monitoring to ensure continued value.
Scope of 'acquisition, program management, and logistics support' is broad and requires clear definition of deliverables.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a healthy market.
Multiple bidders participated, suggesting competitive pricing potential.
Contract duration aligns with long-term defense program needs.

Sector Analysis

The defense sector relies heavily on specialized engineering and program management services to oversee complex weapon systems and operational logistics. This contract falls within the broader engineering services market, which is a significant segment of federal contracting. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar program management and logistics support contracts within the Department of Defense would provide further context on the value and scale of this award.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside. However, the prime contractor, CSA Global LLC, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, depending on the specific task orders and their requirements. The absence of a small business set-aside means the primary competition was open to all eligible firms, potentially limiting direct opportunities for small businesses unless they are part of a larger team or subcontracting plan.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure necessitates robust financial oversight to ensure that all costs incurred by the contractor are allowable, allocable, and reasonable. Transparency is maintained through regular reporting requirements and contract performance reviews. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Defense Acquisition Management Support
Logistics and Supply Chain Services
Program Management Support Services
Engineering Services Contracts
Department of Defense IT and Support Services

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type requires diligent cost oversight.
Long contract duration necessitates sustained performance monitoring.
Broad scope of services requires clear definition and management of deliverables.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.6 million to CSA GLOBAL LLC. IGF::OT::IGF ACQUISITION, PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, AND LOGISTICS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR PMW 770.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CSA GLOBAL LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2017-02-13. End: 2022-06-12.

What is the track record of CSA Global LLC in performing similar defense contracts?

Assessing CSA Global LLC's track record requires a review of their past performance on similar contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense. This would involve examining contract databases for previous awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any documented issues or successes. A history of successful delivery on complex acquisition, program management, and logistics support contracts would indicate a lower performance risk. Conversely, a pattern of cost overruns, schedule delays, or quality issues on prior engagements would raise concerns. Without specific past performance data readily available in this summary, a deeper dive into their contract history is necessary for a comprehensive assessment.

How does the total contract value of $29.6 million compare to similar program management and logistics support contracts within the DoD?

The total contract value of $29.6 million for acquisition, program management, and logistics support services needs to be benchmarked against similar contracts within the Department of Defense to assess its relative scale. This comparison should consider the duration of the contract (1945 days, approximately 5.3 years), the specific services provided, and the complexity of the programs supported. For instance, contracts supporting major weapon systems or large-scale logistical operations might typically range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars over similar periods. A value of $29.6 million over five years could be considered moderate to substantial, depending on the specific scope and criticality of the supported programs. Further analysis would involve identifying comparable contracts awarded by agencies like the Navy (PMW 770 is a Naval program) or other DoD branches for similar services.

What are the primary risks associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this specific engagement?

The primary risk associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this engagement is the potential for cost growth beyond initial estimates, even though the contractor's profit (the fixed fee) is predetermined. While the government agrees to pay all allowable costs, the CPFF structure can incentivize contractors to incur higher costs if oversight is not rigorous, as their fee remains constant regardless of the final cost. This necessitates strong government oversight to ensure that all costs are reasonable, allocable, and necessary for contract performance. Another risk is the potential for scope creep, where the definition of 'allowable costs' might expand without adequate adjustments to the overall value or oversight. Effective management requires detailed cost tracking, regular audits, and clear communication between the government and the contractor.

How effective are the current oversight mechanisms in place for this contract, given its duration and scope?

The effectiveness of oversight mechanisms for this contract hinges on the diligence of the contracting officer, the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), and the program office (PMW 770). Given the contract's duration of over five years and its broad scope encompassing acquisition, program management, and logistics support, robust oversight is critical. Key mechanisms include regular performance reviews, financial audits of incurred costs, adherence to reporting requirements, and proactive risk management. The CPFF structure demands particularly stringent financial oversight. The effectiveness is directly proportional to the resources allocated to oversight, the expertise of the personnel involved, and the clarity of performance metrics and deliverables. Without specific details on the oversight processes implemented, it's difficult to definitively assess effectiveness, but the standard DoD contracting framework provides a basis for such oversight.

What are the historical spending patterns for acquisition, program management, and logistics support services within the Department of Defense?

Historical spending patterns for acquisition, program management, and logistics support services within the Department of Defense are substantial and represent a significant portion of the overall defense budget. These categories are essential for the effective development, procurement, and sustainment of military capabilities. Spending in these areas fluctuates based on geopolitical events, modernization priorities, and specific program lifecycles. For example, periods of increased defense spending often correlate with higher investments in program management and logistics to support new platforms or expanded operations. Analyzing historical data from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or agency budget reports would reveal trends in contract awards, dominant service providers, and the allocation of funds across different defense branches and program types. This contract's $29.6 million value should be viewed within this broader context of consistent, high-level defense spending on essential support services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0002416R3048

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5701 CLEVELAND ST STE 140, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, 23462

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $34,736,650

Exercised Options: $34,736,650

Current Obligation: $29,581,489

Actual Outlays: $1,905,872

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 4

Total Subaward Amount: $11,693,131

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017814D7663

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline