DoD's $21.1M IT contract with PAE Applied Technologies for Computer Facilities Management Services awarded in 2001
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $21,149,490 ($21.1M)
Contractor: PAE Applied Technologies LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2001-07-30
End Date: 2007-04-30
Contract Duration: 2,100 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)
Sector: IT
Place of Performance
Location: FORT WORTH, TARRANT County, TEXAS, 76177
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $21.1 million to PAE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $21.1M over its lifetime suggests a significant investment in IT infrastructure. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 2100 days (approx. 5.75 years) allowed for long-term service provision. 4. Performance was in Texas, potentially impacting the local IT workforce and economy. 5. The NAICS code 541513 points to a focus on computer systems design and related services. 6. The contract was not set aside for small businesses, suggesting larger firms were expected to compete.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total award amount of $21.1 million for Computer Facilities Management Services over approximately 5.75 years averages to roughly $3.66 million per year. Without specific performance metrics or detailed service breakdowns, it's challenging to benchmark this against similar contracts. However, the duration suggests a substantial, ongoing need for these services. The absence of detailed cost breakdowns makes a precise value-for-money assessment difficult, but the competitive award process may have helped ensure a reasonable price.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The fact that there were 10 bids received indicates a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement. A higher number of bidders generally suggests a more robust price discovery process and can lead to more competitive pricing for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely drove down costs through bidding and ensured the government received services from a qualified provider at a potentially optimal price point.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Navy, benefited from these IT management services. Services provided likely included the maintenance, operation, and management of computer facilities. The contract's performance was located in Texas, potentially creating or sustaining IT jobs in that region. The duration of the contract allowed for stable IT support, crucial for military operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the quality and effectiveness of the services provided.
- The significant duration of the contract could lead to vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.
- Limited information on specific deliverables makes it hard to confirm if the full scope of IT facilities management was covered.
- No explicit mention of cybersecurity measures within the provided data raises potential concerns for sensitive DoD data.
- The contract's age (awarded in 2001) means current market rates and technologies may differ significantly, impacting value comparison.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that likely yielded a fair price.
- A substantial number of bids (10) indicates strong market interest and a potentially wide pool of qualified contractors.
- The long contract duration (2100 days) provided stability and continuity for critical IT facilities management.
- The contract was awarded to PAE Applied Technologies, a known entity in government contracting, suggesting a degree of established capability.
- The contract was performed in Texas, potentially supporting the regional economy and IT sector.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically focusing on IT facilities management. The market for such services is substantial, driven by government and commercial entities requiring robust and reliable IT infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing annual IT maintenance and operations contracts for federal agencies of similar size and scope. The $21.1M total award over nearly six years places it as a significant, mid-to-large-sized IT services contract for its time.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does the data indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary contractor, PAE Applied Technologies, was expected to perform the majority of the work. The lack of small business set-aside implications means that opportunities for smaller firms to participate in this specific contract were likely limited unless they were direct subcontractors to the prime. This contract does not appear to have been designed to directly boost the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of the Navy, likely through contracting officers and program managers responsible for ensuring performance and compliance. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's terms and conditions, including service level agreements and payment schedules tied to performance. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS, where basic information is publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense IT Services Contracts
- Navy IT Infrastructure Support
- Computer Facilities Management Services
- Information Technology Professional Services
- Federal IT Operations and Maintenance
Risk Flags
- Contract awarded in 2001, potentially outdated technology and pricing benchmarks.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics in summary data.
- No explicit mention of cybersecurity provisions.
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to long contract duration.
Tags
it-services, facilities-management, department-of-defense, department-of-the-navy, full-and-open-competition, large-contract, texas, computer-systems-design, it-infrastructure, past-performance
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $21.1 million to PAE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PAE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2001-07-30. End: 2007-04-30.
What specific IT facilities management services were included under this contract?
The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Computer Facilities Management Services' under NAICS code 541513. While specific deliverables are not detailed, this typically encompasses a range of services such as the operation, maintenance, and management of computer hardware, software, and network infrastructure within data centers or other IT facilities. This could include tasks like system monitoring, hardware repair and replacement, software patching and updates, user support related to facility access and operation, and ensuring the physical security and environmental controls (e.g., power, cooling) of the IT spaces. The contract's duration and value suggest a comprehensive, long-term support agreement rather than ad-hoc services.
How does the $21.1M contract value compare to similar IT facilities management contracts awarded by the DoD around 2001?
Benchmarking the $21.1 million award for Computer Facilities Management Services against similar DoD contracts from 2001 requires access to historical contract databases and detailed service scope comparisons. However, as a total contract value over approximately 5.75 years, it represents an average annual value of roughly $3.66 million. This figure suggests a significant, ongoing requirement for IT infrastructure support. Contracts of this magnitude were not uncommon for major IT operations within large federal agencies during that period, particularly for facilities management which is critical for maintaining operational readiness. Without specific details on the scope of services, number of users supported, or geographic coverage, a precise comparison is difficult, but the value indicates a substantial commitment to IT infrastructure.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?
The provided summary data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. Typically, contracts for Computer Facilities Management Services would include SLAs related to system uptime, response times for hardware failures, patch deployment timelines, and potentially metrics for energy efficiency or environmental controls within the facilities. The absence of this information in the summary makes it challenging to quantitatively assess the contractor's performance and the overall value delivered. Oversight by the Department of the Navy would have relied on monitoring adherence to these, likely detailed, contractual obligations.
What is the track record of PAE Applied Technologies in providing IT facilities management services to the federal government?
PAE Applied Technologies (now part of PAE Inc.) has a long history of providing a wide range of services to the federal government, including IT support, logistics, and technical services. While this specific contract was awarded in 2001, the company has consistently secured and performed on numerous government contracts across various agencies. Their experience often includes managing complex facilities and infrastructure. A deeper dive into their contract history would reveal the breadth and depth of their IT facilities management capabilities, including past performance on similar-sized or more complex contracts, and any performance issues or accolades received.
Were there any notable risks or challenges identified during the performance of this contract?
The summary data does not explicitly list any identified risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this contract. However, common risks in IT facilities management contracts include hardware obsolescence, cybersecurity threats, unexpected system failures, difficulties in staffing with qualified personnel, and changes in government requirements. Given the contract's age, managing the lifecycle of aging hardware and adapting to evolving IT security landscapes would have been potential challenges. The long duration also presents a risk of scope creep or the need for contract modifications to address unforeseen technological advancements or operational needs.
How did the 'full and open competition' process impact the final contract price and selection?
The 'full and open competition' award for this contract, with 10 bids received, suggests a robust marketplace for Computer Facilities Management Services. This process allows any responsible source to compete, fostering a competitive environment that typically drives down prices as contractors vie for the award. The government benefits from a wider range of potential solutions and potentially lower costs compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios. The selection would have been based on a combination of factors, likely including price, technical approach, past performance, and other evaluation criteria outlined in the solicitation, aiming to achieve the best overall value for the Department of the Navy.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Facilities Management Services
Product/Service Code: QUALITY CONTROL, TEST, INSPECTION › EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS TESTING
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)
Address: 6500 WEST FREEWAY, SUITE 6, FORT WORTH, TX, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2001-07-30
Current End Date: 2007-04-30
Potential End Date: 2007-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-05-28
More Contracts from PAE Applied Technologies LLC
- TAS::97 4930::TAS — $911.3M (Department of Defense)
- Facilities Support Services TAS::80 0130::TAS — $819.1M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Other Target Cost - Aircraft Maintenance — $528.4M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $494.9M (Department of Defense)
- Awarding and Adding Funding to the Contract — $425.6M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)