Naval Sea Systems Command awards $10.8M contract for radar equipment to DRS Electronic Systems Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,958,381 ($11.0M)
Contractor: DRS C3 & Aviation Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 1997-10-10
End Date: 2003-11-17
Contract Duration: 2,229 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 199808!1700!0034!BZ005!NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0002498C5206 !A!*!* !19971010!20001110!107932832!107932832!061345351!N!66839!DRS ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INC !200 PROFESSIONAL DR !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20879!15208!131!51!CHESAPEAKE !NORTHAMPTON !VIRGINIA !0001!+000004792093!N!N!000000000000!5840!RADAR EQUIPMENT, EXCEPT AIRBORNE !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !5065!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !Y!J!2!003!B!* !A!N!A!* !* !N!C!*!Z!Z!A!A!A!*!* !*!N!A!D!N!*!*!*!*!*!
Place of Performance
Location: GAITHERSBURG, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20879, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.0 million to DRS C3 & AVIATION COMPANY for work described as: 199808!1700!0034!BZ005!NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0002498C5206 !A!*!* !19971010!20001110!107932832!107932832!061345351!N!66839!DRS ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INC !200 PROFESSIONAL DR !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20879!15208!131!51!CHESAPEAKE !NORTHA… Key points: 1. The contract is for radar equipment, excluding airborne systems. 2. DRS Electronic Systems Inc. is the awardee, with a prior contract value of $10.8M. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 4. The period of performance spans from October 1997 to November 2003, with a duration of 2229 days.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $10.8 million for radar equipment appears reasonable given the 6-year performance period. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized defense electronics would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process is expected to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for necessary defense equipment.
Public Impact
This contract supports the Navy's operational capabilities by providing essential radar equipment. The duration of the contract indicates a long-term need for these systems. The award to DRS Electronic Systems Inc. signifies their role as a key supplier in this defense sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if the fixed-price contract does not adequately account for all project expenses.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical radar components could pose supply chain risks.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive market.
- Long contract duration suggests a stable and predictable need for the equipment.
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically for electronics and communication equipment. Spending in this area is critical for maintaining military readiness and technological superiority.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further investigation would be needed to assess small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was managed by the Naval Sea Systems Command and overseen by the Defense Contract Management Agency, suggesting established oversight mechanisms are in place.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for technology obsolescence given the contract award and performance period.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical components.
- Lack of specific details on the radar system's capabilities and performance metrics.
- No clear indication of small business subcontracting participation.
Tags
department-of-defense, md, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.0 million to DRS C3 & AVIATION COMPANY. 199808!1700!0034!BZ005!NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND !N0002498C5206 !A!*!* !19971010!20001110!107932832!107932832!061345351!N!66839!DRS ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INC !200 PROFESSIONAL DR !GAITHERSBURG !MD!20879!15208!131!51!CHESAPEAKE !NORTHAMPTON !VIRGINIA !0001!+000004792093!N!N!000000000000!5840!RADAR EQUIPMENT, EXCEPT AIRBORNE !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION !2000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !5065!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !Y!J!2!0
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DRS C3 & AVIATION COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 1997-10-10. End: 2003-11-17.
What is the specific type of radar equipment being procured, and how does it compare to current technological standards?
The contract specifies 'RADAR EQUIPMENT, EXCEPT AIRBORNE'. Without further details, it's difficult to ascertain the exact technological specifications. However, given the 1997 award date and 2003 completion, it likely represents technology from that era. A comparison to current standards would highlight potential obsolescence or the need for upgrades.
What were the key factors considered during the full and open competition that led to this specific award?
During a full and open competition, factors typically include technical capability, past performance, delivery timelines, and price. The Naval Sea Systems Command would have evaluated proposals against these criteria to select the offer that best met the government's requirements. The specific weighting of these factors would be detailed in the solicitation documents.
How effectively did this radar equipment contribute to the operational readiness of the Naval Sea Systems Command during its service life?
The effectiveness of the radar equipment is directly tied to its performance in detecting and tracking targets, contributing to situational awareness and mission success. Its long service life suggests it met operational needs for an extended period. However, a definitive assessment would require analyzing operational reports and any reported system failures or successes.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leonardo SPA (UEI: 428869465)
Address: 400 PROFESSIONAL DR STE 400, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 20879
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 1997-10-10
Current End Date: 2003-11-17
Potential End Date: 2003-11-17 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2015-09-04
More Contracts from DRS C3 & Aviation Company
- Jordan Border Security Program Phase 1B — $49.2M (Department of Defense)
- 200108!000685!1700!AC522 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001901C0161 !A!N!*!N! !20010330!20020330!076294834!076294834!061345351!n!drs Precision Echo Inc !133 Bauer Drive !oakland !nj!07436!69084!085!06!santa Clara !santa Clara !california!+000007592596!n!n!000000000000!5835!sound Recording & Reproducing Equipment !A7 !electronics and Communication !2apc!p-3 Orion !336413!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !D !n!a!1!001!n!1a!z!y!c! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! — $28.0M (Department of Defense)
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology) — $25.6M (Department of Defense)
- Initial Funding for Option Year TWO of the Contract for Support for the Period of 12/19/11 Through 01/06/2012 — $23.4M (Department of Homeland Security)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)