Department of the Navy awards $160M+ for aircraft engine maintenance, primarily to Rolls-Royce Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $160,005,954 ($160.0M)

Contractor: Rolls-Royce Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-08-17

End Date: 2023-07-31

Contract Duration: 348 days

Daily Burn Rate: $459.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: MAINTENANCE & RELATED SERVICES (CNATRA) FY22 AUGUST-SEPTEMBER

Place of Performance

Location: INDIANAPOLIS, MARION County, INDIANA, 46225

State: Indiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $160.0 million to ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION for work described as: MAINTENANCE & RELATED SERVICES (CNATRA) FY22 AUGUST-SEPTEMBER Key points: 1. Contract awarded for essential aircraft engine maintenance services, crucial for naval aviation readiness. 2. Sole-source award to Rolls-Royce Corporation suggests a reliance on original equipment manufacturer expertise. 3. Significant contract value indicates a substantial investment in maintaining high-performance military aircraft. 4. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs, though potential for cost overruns exists in complex maintenance. 5. Contract duration of nearly a year highlights the ongoing need for sustained support. 6. The award falls under the Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing NAICS code, indicating specialized industrial support.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of over $160 million for aircraft engine maintenance is substantial. Without specific benchmarks for this type of specialized maintenance for naval aircraft, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the sole-source nature of the award to Rolls-Royce Corporation, the original equipment manufacturer, often implies higher costs compared to competitive bids from third-party MRO providers. The firm fixed-price structure provides some cost certainty, but the complexity of jet engine maintenance can lead to unforeseen issues that may impact the final cost.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis to Rolls-Royce Corporation. This indicates that the Department of the Navy determined that only Rolls-Royce could provide the necessary specialized maintenance and parts for their aircraft engines. The lack of competition means that pricing was not subjected to market forces, potentially leading to higher costs for the government compared to a competitively bid contract. This approach is often taken when proprietary knowledge, specialized tooling, or unique technical expertise is required.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this award means taxpayers did not benefit from competitive pricing, potentially resulting in a higher overall expenditure for these critical maintenance services.

Public Impact

Naval aviation units operating aircraft powered by Rolls-Royce engines will benefit from maintained operational readiness. Services delivered include maintenance and repair of critical aircraft engine components, ensuring flight safety and performance. Geographic impact is likely widespread, supporting naval air stations and deployed fleet operations globally. Workforce implications include the direct employment of skilled technicians and engineers by Rolls-Royce Corporation and potentially its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on the maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) of aircraft engines. The market for military aircraft engine MRO is often dominated by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) like Rolls-Royce due to the highly specialized nature of the technology and proprietary information involved. While third-party MRO providers exist, they may not always have the necessary certifications, tooling, or access to parts for all engine types. Spending in this area is critical for maintaining fleet readiness and is a significant component of defense budgets.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to involve a small business set-aside. Given the sole-source nature and the specialized requirements of aircraft engine maintenance, it is unlikely that small businesses would be primary awardees. However, Rolls-Royce Corporation may engage small businesses as subcontractors for specific components or services, though this is not explicitly detailed in the provided data. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on the extent of any subcontracting opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are embedded within the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring Rolls-Royce Corporation to deliver specified maintenance services. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature, but contract awards are generally reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

defense, department-of-the-navy, rolls-royce-corporation, aircraft-engine-maintenance, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, large-contract, oem-support, naval-aviation, indiana

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $160.0 million to ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION. MAINTENANCE & RELATED SERVICES (CNATRA) FY22 AUGUST-SEPTEMBER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $160.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-08-17. End: 2023-07-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for aircraft engine maintenance with Rolls-Royce Corporation by the Department of the Navy?

Analyzing historical spending with Rolls-Royce Corporation for similar aircraft engine maintenance services by the Department of the Navy is crucial for context. While this specific award is over $160 million, understanding if this represents an increase, decrease, or consistent level of spending compared to previous years or similar contracts can reveal trends. For instance, if spending has been steadily rising, it might indicate increasing maintenance needs, aging fleets, or inflationary pressures. Conversely, a decrease could suggest fleet modernization or improved maintenance efficiencies. Without access to historical contract data, it's difficult to provide precise figures, but such analysis would inform whether this current award is within expected budgetary parameters and if the government is achieving economies of scale over time.

How does the cost of this sole-source contract compare to potential costs if it were competitively bid?

Assessing the cost difference between this sole-source award and a hypothetical competitive bid is challenging without market data. However, it is a widely accepted principle in government contracting that sole-source awards typically result in higher prices than competitively procured contracts. This is because competition drives down prices as contractors vie for the award. Rolls-Royce Corporation, as the original equipment manufacturer (OEM), likely has unique access to proprietary information, specialized tooling, and genuine parts, which can justify a higher price. Nevertheless, the absence of competitive pressure means the government may be paying a premium. Benchmarking against similar sole-source OEM maintenance contracts for other aircraft types or services could provide a rough estimate of this premium, but a definitive comparison requires a competitive bidding process.

What are the specific performance metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) associated with this maintenance contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific performance metrics or Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. However, for aircraft engine maintenance, typical KPIs would likely include metrics related to turnaround time (TAT) for repairs, engine availability rates, adherence to scheduled maintenance, quality of workmanship (e.g., defect rates), and compliance with safety and regulatory standards. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that Rolls-Royce Corporation is obligated to meet certain performance standards to receive full payment. The Department of the Navy would have internal processes for monitoring these metrics, and failure to meet them could result in penalties or affect future contract awards. Robust KPIs are essential for ensuring the government receives the value it expects for its investment.

What is the track record of Rolls-Royce Corporation in fulfilling similar sole-source maintenance contracts for the Department of Defense?

Rolls-Royce Corporation has a long-standing history of providing engines and maintenance services to various branches of the U.S. military, including the Department of Defense. They are a primary supplier for several key platforms, often leading to sole-source or limited-competition contracts for specialized maintenance and support due to the proprietary nature of their engine technology. Historically, their performance has been generally regarded as meeting the demanding requirements of military aviation. However, like any large contractor, there may have been instances of performance issues, cost overruns, or disputes on specific contracts. A comprehensive review of their past performance, including any documented issues or commendations from the DoD, would be necessary for a complete assessment of their track record on similar sole-source agreements.

What is the potential risk associated with the long-term reliance on a single provider for critical aircraft engine maintenance?

The long-term reliance on a single provider like Rolls-Royce Corporation for critical aircraft engine maintenance presents several risks. Firstly, it can lead to a loss of organic government capability and expertise in engine maintenance, making the DoD more dependent on the contractor. Secondly, it can reduce bargaining power over time, as the contractor may face less pressure to innovate or offer competitive pricing. Thirdly, supply chain disruptions affecting the sole provider could have a disproportionately large impact on fleet readiness. Finally, if the contractor's business strategy shifts or they face financial difficulties, it could jeopardize the availability of essential support. Mitigating these risks often involves strategic sourcing, fostering competition where feasible, and maintaining robust government oversight.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0001921R0016

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC

Address: 450 S MERIDIAN ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN, 46225

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Foreign Owned, Foreign-Owned and U.S.-Incorporated Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $160,005,954

Exercised Options: $160,005,954

Current Obligation: $160,005,954

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 104

Total Subaward Amount: $35,824,305

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0001922D0042

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2022-08-17

Current End Date: 2023-07-31

Potential End Date: 2023-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-05-31

More Contracts from Rolls-Royce Corporation

View all Rolls-Royce Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending