DoD awards Northrop Grumman $48.7M for NGJ LB INC 2 tech demonstration
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $48,697,821 ($48.7M)
Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-10-25
End Date: 2020-08-31
Contract Duration: 676 days
Daily Burn Rate: $72.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: DEMONSTRATION OF EXISTING TECHNOLOGIES FOR NGJ LB INC 2
Place of Performance
Location: BETHPAGE, NASSAU County, NEW YORK, 11714
State: New York Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $48.7 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: DEMONSTRATION OF EXISTING TECHNOLOGIES FOR NGJ LB INC 2 Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, large defense contractor, indicating potential for limited competition. 2. Focus on R&D in physical and engineering sciences suggests innovation but also inherent project risk. 3. The $48.7M award for a technology demonstration highlights investment in future defense capabilities. 4. Contract duration of 676 days points to a substantial development and testing phase.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $48.7M for a technology demonstration is within a reasonable range for complex R&D projects. Benchmarking against similar R&D contracts for advanced systems is difficult without more specific technical details.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the award to a single entity, Northrop Grumman, warrants further investigation into the specific evaluation criteria and the number of bids received.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for research and development, aiming to advance defense technology. The ultimate value to taxpayers depends on the successful development and deployment of the demonstrated technologies.
Public Impact
Investment in advanced defense technology could lead to enhanced national security capabilities. The project's success could spur further innovation and technological advancements in the defense sector. Potential for job creation within the defense industry and related research fields. Transparency in the bidding process is crucial to ensure fair use of public funds.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited visibility into the specific technologies being demonstrated.
- Potential for cost overruns in complex R&D projects.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical technology development.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Focus on developing advanced, potentially game-changing technologies.
- Contract awarded to a well-established defense contractor with relevant expertise.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. Spending in this sector is critical for maintaining technological superiority but often involves high risk and long development cycles. Benchmarks vary widely based on the specific scientific domain.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to Northrop Grumman, a large defense contractor. There is no explicit indication of small business participation in this specific award, suggesting that opportunities for small businesses may be limited unless they are subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense, through the Defense Contract Management Agency, is responsible for overseeing this contract. Robust oversight is necessary to ensure adherence to cost, schedule, and performance requirements, especially for R&D efforts.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract awarded to a single entity.
- Research and Development projects inherently carry high risk.
- Lack of specific detail on the technologies being developed.
- Potential for cost overruns in complex R&D.
- No explicit mention of small business participation.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, ny, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $48.7 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. DEMONSTRATION OF EXISTING TECHNOLOGIES FOR NGJ LB INC 2
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $48.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-10-25. End: 2020-08-31.
What specific technologies are being demonstrated under the NGJ LB INC 2 program, and what is their projected impact on future defense capabilities?
The specific technologies under the NGJ LB INC 2 program are not detailed in the provided data. However, 'NGJ LB INC 2' likely refers to a component or phase of the Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) program, which aims to provide advanced electronic warfare capabilities for naval aircraft. The projected impact could include significantly enhanced electronic attack and protection against sophisticated threats, thereby improving aircrew survivability and mission effectiveness.
Given the R&D nature of the contract, what are the primary risks associated with achieving the program's objectives and staying within budget?
Primary risks include technological immaturity, where the core technologies may not perform as expected or require significant redesign. Schedule risks arise from unforeseen technical challenges or integration issues. Cost risks are inherent in R&D, with potential for cost overruns due to scope creep, testing failures, or the need for additional research. Effective risk mitigation strategies and agile development methodologies are crucial.
How will the success of this technology demonstration be measured, and what are the criteria for determining its effectiveness and value for future investment?
Success will likely be measured against predefined technical performance metrics (TPMs) outlined in the contract's Statement of Work. These could include range, power output, signal processing capabilities, and integration with existing platforms. Effectiveness and value will be determined by demonstrating that the technology meets or exceeds these TPMs, offers a significant improvement over current capabilities, and provides a viable path for full-scale development and procurement within acceptable cost and schedule constraints.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › C – National Defense R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: N0001918R0008
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation (UEI: 967356127)
Address: 925 OYSTER BAY RD, BETHPAGE, NY, 11714
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $48,697,821
Exercised Options: $48,697,821
Current Obligation: $48,697,821
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 27
Total Subaward Amount: $16,039,660
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-10-25
Current End Date: 2020-08-31
Potential End Date: 2020-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-06-23
More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
- 200506!000026!5700!fa8214!oo-Alc/Pkme/Lmke !F4261098C0001 !A!N! !Y! !p01502!20041213!20050701!001563738!004179453!016435559!n!northrop Grumman Space & Missi!888 S 2000 E !clearfield !ut!84015!13850!011!49!clearfield !davis !utah !-000001960000!n!n!000000000000!l014!tech REP Svcs/Guided Missiles !A2 !missile and Space Systems !302 !minuteman III GRP !541330!E! !3! ! !C! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!l!2!002!b! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $10.0B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-7) — $8.5B (Department of Defense)
- E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Aircraft (FRP-2) — $5.4B (Department of Defense)
- First DDT and E, Ares I-X, and Flight Tests. First Stage Will BE a Five Segment, Solid Rocket Booster Derived From the Space Shuttle Program (SSP) Solid Rocket Booster (srb)/Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (rsrm). the Contractor Shall Furnish the Necessary Management, Engineering, Labor, Facilities, Tools, Equipment, and Materials Required for First Stage Development, Qualification, Certification and Acceptance Program. Activities Include: Redesign and Testing of the Motor to Incorporate the Fifth Segment and Production of Five Full Scale Ground Static Test Motors: TWO Development Motors (dms)-And Three Qualification Motors (QMS); Structural Test Article (STA), Ground Vibration Test Motors (gvtms) and Other Development Testing; Redesign of the Avionics, Deceleration, Separation, and Flight Termination System (FTS) Subsystems; Ares I-X: Simulated Ares I Outer Mold Line/Mass Properties Using Modified Srb/Rsrm; and Three Flight Test Vehicles. TAS::80 0124::TAS — $4.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Federal Contract — $4.4B (Department of Defense)
View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)