DoD awards $1.63B for E-2D Advanced Hawkeye aircraft production, raising questions on competition and value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,627,964,603 ($1.6B)

Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-03-15

End Date: 2019-04-30

Contract Duration: 3,333 days

Daily Burn Rate: $488.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: E-2D ADVANCED HAWKEYE AIRCRAFT (LRIP 3)

Place of Performance

Location: MELBOURNE, BREVARD County, FLORIDA, 32904

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $1.63 billion to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: E-2D ADVANCED HAWKEYE AIRCRAFT (LRIP 3) Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting price discovery and potentially increasing costs. 2. Significant investment in a critical defense platform, highlighting its strategic importance. 3. Long contract duration (over 9 years) suggests a stable, long-term production run. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type shifts risk to the contractor, but may include higher initial pricing. 5. Lack of competition raises concerns about cost-effectiveness and potential for contractor lock-in. 6. Focus on aircraft manufacturing indicates a mature industrial base for this specialized equipment.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $1.63 billion for the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye aircraft (LRIP 3) represents a substantial investment. Without competitive bidding, it is difficult to benchmark the pricing against market alternatives or similar contracts. The firm fixed-price structure implies that the contractor bears cost overruns, but the initial price may be inflated due to the lack of competition. Further analysis would be needed to compare unit costs to historical data or other government procurements of similar complex aircraft.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one bidder, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, was solicited. This approach is typically used when a unique capability is required or when only one source can provide the necessary goods or services. The absence of multiple bidders significantly limits price discovery and competitive pressure, which can lead to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition means taxpayers may be paying a premium for these aircraft, as there was no opportunity for multiple companies to bid and drive down prices through a competitive process.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Navy, which operates the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye for airborne early warning and control missions. The contract delivers advanced aircraft crucial for national defense and intelligence gathering. The geographic impact is primarily within Florida, where the contract was awarded, potentially supporting local jobs and the aerospace industry. Workforce implications include skilled labor in aircraft manufacturing, engineering, and related support services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The E-2D Advanced Hawkeye is a highly specialized airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft. This contract falls within the broader aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, which is characterized by high barriers to entry, significant R&D investment, and long production cycles. The market for such advanced military aircraft is limited, often dominated by a few prime contractors. Comparable spending benchmarks would likely involve other large-scale defense procurement programs for complex weapon systems.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb: false'. Furthermore, the prime contractor, Northrop Grumman, is a large aerospace corporation. While large prime contractors are often required to subcontract a portion of their work to small businesses, the specific subcontracting plan and its impact on the small business ecosystem are not detailed in the provided data. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the direct benefits or implications for small businesses in this specific procurement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is responsible for ensuring contractor performance and compliance. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which places cost risk on the contractor. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, northrop-grumman-systems-corporation, e-2d-advanced-hawkeye, aircraft-manufacturing, firm-fixed-price, definitive-contract, sole-source, florida, navy, airborne-early-warning-control

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $1.63 billion to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. E-2D ADVANCED HAWKEYE AIRCRAFT (LRIP 3)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.63 billion.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-03-15. End: 2019-04-30.

What is Northrop Grumman's track record with the E-2D program and similar sole-source defense contracts?

Northrop Grumman has been the prime contractor for the E-2 Hawkeye program since its inception, including the development and production of the E-2D variant. Their track record with this specific platform is extensive, involving numerous production lots and upgrades. Regarding similar sole-source defense contracts, large defense primes like Northrop Grumman frequently engage in sole-source or limited-competition procurements for specialized systems where they possess unique capabilities or are the sole qualified manufacturer. This is often due to the highly technical nature of defense systems, long development cycles, and the government's specific requirements that may not be met by multiple vendors. While this can ensure program continuity and leverage existing expertise, it necessitates robust government oversight to ensure fair pricing and value.

How does the unit cost of the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye under this contract compare to previous lots or similar aircraft?

Direct comparison of unit costs is challenging without access to detailed pricing breakdowns for previous lots or comparable aircraft. However, given this was LRIP 3 (Lot 3), unit costs often decrease in initial production lots due to economies of scale and learning curve efficiencies. The fact that this contract is sole-source, however, could counteract potential cost reductions that might arise from competition. Historical data for E-2D production lots would be the primary benchmark. If unit costs have increased significantly from Lot 1 or Lot 2 without clear justification (e.g., major upgrades, inflation), it would raise concerns about value for money. Benchmarking against other AEW&C platforms, while imperfect due to differing capabilities and technologies, could provide a broader market perspective.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for a major defense system like the E-2D?

The primary risks associated with a sole-source award for the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye include inflated pricing due to the lack of competitive pressure, potential for reduced innovation as the contractor faces no direct competition, and contractor lock-in, making it difficult and costly to switch providers in the future. There's also a risk of complacency in performance or cost management by the sole provider. For taxpayers, the main risk is overpaying for the aircraft. To mitigate these risks, the government relies heavily on robust negotiation, detailed cost analysis, performance metrics, and continuous oversight by agencies like the DCMA and potentially the Government Accountability Office (GAO) for contract reviews.

How effective is the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye program in meeting its stated mission objectives?

The E-2D Advanced Hawkeye is designed to provide the U.S. Navy with a significant leap in airborne early warning and control capabilities compared to its predecessors. Its mission objectives include detecting and tracking threats at extended ranges, providing command and control for naval forces, and enhancing situational awareness across the battlespace. Reports from the Navy and operational deployments generally indicate that the E-2D is highly effective in meeting these objectives, offering improved radar performance, data processing, and networking capabilities. Its role in carrier strike group operations is considered critical. Program effectiveness is typically assessed through operational testing, fleet feedback, and mission success rates during exercises and real-world operations.

What are the historical spending patterns for the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye program, and how does this contract fit within that trend?

Historical spending on the E-2D program has been substantial, reflecting the complexity and advanced technology of the aircraft. Prior to this LRIP 3 contract, there were earlier low-rate initial production (LRIP) phases and development contracts. Spending typically follows a pattern of high R&D costs followed by increasing production costs as manufacturing scales up. This $1.63 billion contract for LRIP 3 represents a significant tranche of funding for ongoing production. Analyzing total program spending across all lots, including this one, provides context for the overall investment. Trends might show increasing or decreasing unit costs across production lots, potential budget fluctuations based on defense priorities, and the total lifecycle cost of the program. This contract fits within the established production phase, continuing the investment in fielding the E-2D fleet.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0001910R0037

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation (UEI: 967356127)

Address: 2000 W NASA BLVD, MELBOURNE, FL, 32904

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,627,964,603

Exercised Options: $1,627,964,603

Current Obligation: $1,627,964,603

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-03-15

Current End Date: 2019-04-30

Potential End Date: 2019-04-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2019-10-30

More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending