DoD's $49.7M training contract to Valiant Global Defense Services Inc. awarded via full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $49,686,919 ($49.7M)

Contractor: Valiant Global Defense Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-03-30

End Date: 2025-03-19

Contract Duration: 1,085 days

Daily Burn Rate: $45.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TRAINING & EDUCATION SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: TWENTYNINE PALMS, SAN BERNARDINO County, CALIFORNIA, 92278

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $49.7 million to VALIANT GLOBAL DEFENSE SERVICES INC. for work described as: TRAINING & EDUCATION SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded for training and education support services, indicating a need for specialized instructional capabilities. 2. The contract's duration of 1085 days suggests a significant, ongoing requirement for these services. 3. Awarded by the Department of the Navy, this contract falls under the broader Department of Defense spending umbrella. 4. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that cost risks are largely borne by the contractor. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 611519 points to vocational and technical training. 6. The contract's value of approximately $49.7 million represents a substantial investment in personnel development.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $49.7 million for training and education support services appears reasonable given the duration and scope. Benchmarking against similar large-scale training contracts within the DoD would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure generally offers good cost control for the government, provided the scope is well-defined. Without specific per-unit cost data or detailed service breakdowns, a definitive assessment of pricing efficiency is challenging, but the overall award size is within expected ranges for comprehensive training programs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple offerors had the opportunity to bid. This process is designed to foster a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service quality. The fact that it was competed broadly indicates that the government sought the best value from the widest possible pool of qualified contractors. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation implies a robust competitive landscape.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and ensuring that government funds are used efficiently to obtain the best possible services.

Public Impact

Military personnel and potentially civilian employees will benefit from enhanced training and education. The services delivered likely include curriculum development, instruction, and potentially simulation or specialized training equipment. The contract is associated with the state of California, suggesting a primary geographic impact for service delivery or personnel training. This contract supports the readiness and skill development of the armed forces, contributing to national security objectives. The workforce implications include employment opportunities for instructors, curriculum developers, and support staff within the contractor's organization.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if training requirements are not precisely defined.
Ensuring the quality and effectiveness of the training delivered over the contract's multi-year duration.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical training functions could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process likely yielded fair pricing.
Firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor, providing budget certainty.
The contractor, Valiant Global Defense Services Inc., likely possesses specialized expertise in defense training.
The contract's significant value suggests a recognized need and potential for high-impact training outcomes.

Sector Analysis

The training and education support services sector is a critical component of the defense industrial base, ensuring personnel are equipped with necessary skills. This contract, valued at approximately $49.7 million, fits within the broader market for professional, scientific, and technical services, specifically focusing on educational instruction. Comparable spending benchmarks in this area often involve large, multi-year contracts for specialized training, particularly for complex military systems or operational procedures. The NAICS code 611519 indicates a focus on vocational and technical training, a segment that supports the development of specialized skills essential for military operations.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not appear to have a specific small business set-aside designation (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that small businesses may have participated as subcontractors to larger prime contractors, or that the primary competition was among large businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business subcontracting opportunities and their impact on the small business ecosystem within this sector.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract structure, which incentivizes contractor performance within agreed-upon costs. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Training Programs
Naval Education and Training Command
Professional Development Services
Vocational and Technical Education Contracts
Defense Contractor Performance Management

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues impacting training quality.
Risk of scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined.
Contract duration may exceed the relevance of certain training content.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical services.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $49.7 million to VALIANT GLOBAL DEFENSE SERVICES INC.. TRAINING & EDUCATION SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is VALIANT GLOBAL DEFENSE SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $49.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-03-30. End: 2025-03-19.

What is Valiant Global Defense Services Inc.'s track record with similar DoD training contracts?

Valiant Global Defense Services Inc. has a history of performing contracts for the Department of Defense, often in areas related to training, logistics, and technical support. Analyzing their past performance on similar training and education support contracts, particularly those with the Department of the Navy or other branches, would reveal their ability to meet performance requirements, manage costs, and adhere to schedules. Specific metrics such as past performance ratings, any contract disputes or terminations, and the scale of previous awards would provide crucial context for assessing their suitability and reliability for this $49.7 million contract. A review of their contract history would indicate if they have successfully delivered complex training solutions in the past and if they have a pattern of exceeding or merely meeting expectations.

How does the $49.7 million contract value compare to similar training services procured by the Navy or DoD?

The $49.7 million contract value for training and education support services awarded to Valiant Global Defense Services Inc. is substantial, reflecting a significant investment. To benchmark its value, one would compare it to other large-scale training contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy or the broader DoD for similar services, such as flight training, technical systems operation, or leadership development. Factors like the duration of the contract (1085 days), the number of personnel to be trained, the complexity of the subject matter, and the specific deliverables (e.g., curriculum development, simulation, instruction) influence cost. If comparable contracts for similar scope and duration are in the tens of millions, this award appears within a reasonable range. However, a detailed analysis of per-unit costs or cost-per-trainee would offer a more precise value-for-money assessment.

What are the primary risks associated with this training support contract?

Key risks associated with this training support contract include potential performance deficiencies, where the contractor may fail to deliver training that meets the required standards or objectives, impacting military readiness. There's also a risk of cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price contract is not managed effectively, although the primary cost risk lies with the contractor. Scope creep is another concern; if the training requirements evolve significantly beyond the initial scope, it could lead to contract modifications and potential disputes. Furthermore, reliance on a single contractor for critical training functions could pose a risk if the contractor experiences financial instability or significant operational disruptions. Ensuring the long-term relevance and effectiveness of the training content in a rapidly evolving military environment is also a consideration.

How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for taxpayer money in this context?

The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally considered advantageous for taxpayers when the scope of work is well-defined and the risks are understood. In this case, for training and education support services, an FFP contract shifts the primary financial risk to the contractor, Valiant Global Defense Services Inc. This means the government knows the total cost upfront, providing budget certainty. The contractor is incentivized to perform efficiently and control costs to maximize their profit margin. However, the effectiveness hinges on the clarity and completeness of the contract's specifications. If the requirements are ambiguous or subject to change, the FFP structure could lead to disputes or the contractor cutting corners on quality to maintain profitability, potentially undermining the value for taxpayers. Robust oversight is still necessary to ensure quality standards are met.

What is the historical spending trend for training and education support services by the Department of the Navy?

Historical spending by the Department of the Navy (DoN) on training and education support services has been substantial, reflecting the continuous need to maintain and enhance the skills of its personnel across various domains. Analyzing past spending patterns would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the types of services procured. For instance, spending may fluctuate based on new platform introductions, evolving geopolitical threats, or shifts in training methodologies. The DoN consistently invests in areas like technical training for naval systems, leadership development, and specialized operational skills. Understanding this historical context, including average contract sizes and the prevalence of full and open competition versus other methods, helps contextualize the current $49.7 million award to Valiant Global Defense Services Inc. and assess its alignment with established spending priorities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Technical and Trade Schools › Other Technical and Trade Schools

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: M6785421R8002

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3940 RUFFIN RD STE C, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92123

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $49,956,209

Exercised Options: $49,853,695

Current Obligation: $49,686,919

Actual Outlays: $22,211,794

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: M6785421D8076

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline