DoD's $22.1M Enterprise Maintenance Contract Awarded to ESCGOV, Inc. Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,110,855 ($22.1M)
Contractor: Escgov, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-02-03
End Date: 2014-01-31
Contract Duration: 1,823 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: MAINTENANCE FOR ENTERPRISE
Place of Performance
Location: QUANTICO, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22134
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $22.1 million to ESCGOV, INC. for work described as: MAINTENANCE FOR ENTERPRISE Key points: 1. The contract value of $22.1 million over approximately 5 years suggests a significant investment in enterprise maintenance. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, this indicates a competitive bidding process was utilized. 3. The lack of small business participation is a notable point for consideration. 4. The sector appears to be IT/Office Machinery, given the PSC code and description.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $22.1 million over 5 years averages to roughly $4.4 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar enterprise maintenance contracts would be necessary to fully assess its value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, suggesting multiple bidders participated. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through market forces.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may benefit from competitive pricing due to the full and open competition. The duration of the contract (over 5 years) implies a long-term need for these maintenance services. The absence of small business participation warrants further investigation into potential barriers or opportunities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- No small business participation.
- Long contract duration could lead to price increases if not managed effectively.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Clear contract type (Firm Fixed Price) provides cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Office Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing category, often associated with IT infrastructure and support services. Spending in this area is critical for maintaining operational efficiency within government agencies.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that no small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or potentially as subcontractors. This could suggest a lack of outreach or opportunities for small businesses in this specific procurement.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, part of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract management offices within the Navy to ensure performance and adherence to terms.
Related Government Programs
- Office Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- No small business participation.
- Long contract duration.
- Potential for price escalation over time.
- Lack of detailed competition metrics (e.g., number of bids).
Tags
office-machinery-and-equipment-rental-an, department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $22.1 million to ESCGOV, INC.. MAINTENANCE FOR ENTERPRISE
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ESCGOV, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-02-03. End: 2014-01-31.
What was the competitive landscape like during the bidding process for this contract?
The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. While this suggests a competitive process, the specific number of bids received and the range of pricing offered would provide a clearer picture of the actual competitive intensity and how effectively it drove down costs for the government.
What is the potential risk associated with the long duration of this maintenance contract?
A contract spanning over 5 years (1823 days) carries the risk of price escalation if market conditions change significantly or if the initial pricing was not adequately benchmarked. There's also a risk of technological obsolescence if the maintenance services are tied to specific equipment that becomes outdated. Effective contract management and potential for re-negotiation clauses are crucial mitigations.
How effective was the full and open competition in achieving optimal value for taxpayers?
Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging a wide range of offers. However, its effectiveness hinges on the specific market dynamics and the clarity of the solicitation. Without knowing the number of bids or the price spread, it's difficult to definitively assess the value achieved. The benchmark price (br) of 12129 might offer a clue if it represents a comparison point.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing › Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing › Office Machinery and Equipment Rental and Leasing
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Address: 7726 FALSTAFF RD, MC LEAN, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,110,855
Exercised Options: $22,110,855
Current Obligation: $22,110,855
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS35F0363P
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-02-03
Current End Date: 2014-01-31
Potential End Date: 2014-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-03-06
More Contracts from Escgov, Inc.
- Order for Software and Services Special Option for ESS IBM BPA Prodcuts — $104.0M (Department of Homeland Security)
- IBM Distributed Software License and Maintenance Renewal — $100.3M (Department of Homeland Security)
- IVM Software Licenses and Maintenance — $94.2M (Department of Homeland Security)
- IBM Software Licenses and Annual Maintenance — $83.8M (Department of Homeland Security)
- IBM Software Renewal — $68.5M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)