DOJ's $158.7M Contract for Corrections Facility Services Awarded to CoreCivic, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $158,727,272 ($158.7M)

Contractor: Corecivic, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2000-06-09

End Date: 2010-09-30

Contract Duration: 3,765 days

Daily Burn Rate: $42.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 151060 - CONTRACTOR-OWNED AND OPERATED CORRECTRIONS FACILITY

Place of Performance

Location: MILAN, CIBOLA County, NEW MEXICO, 87021

State: New Mexico Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $158.7 million to CORECIVIC, INC. for work described as: 151060 - CONTRACTOR-OWNED AND OPERATED CORRECTRIONS FACILITY Key points: 1. CoreCivic, Inc. secured a significant contract for correctional facility operations. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The fixed-price incentive contract type aims to balance cost control with performance. 4. This spending falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, crucial for government operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $158.7M over its duration appears substantial for facilities support services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale correctional facility contracts would be necessary to fully assess its pricing fairness.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for the operation of a correctional facility, with the expectation of efficient service delivery and cost-effectiveness through competitive procurement.

Public Impact

Ensures continued operation of federal correctional facilities, impacting inmate management and public safety. Supports government's role in justice system by providing essential infrastructure and services. Potential impact on local economies through job creation and resource utilization in New Mexico.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category encompassing the operation and maintenance of government facilities. Spending in this sector is critical for ensuring the functionality of various government agencies and programs, including correctional services.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a stated factor (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests the contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, and larger prime contractors likely managed the work.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would involve monitoring contractor performance against contract terms, service level agreements, and cost controls. The Bureau of Prisons would be responsible for ensuring accountability and adherence to regulations.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

facilities-support-services, department-of-justice, nm, dca, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $158.7 million to CORECIVIC, INC.. 151060 - CONTRACTOR-OWNED AND OPERATED CORRECTRIONS FACILITY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CORECIVIC, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $158.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-06-09. End: 2010-09-30.

What was the specific performance criteria tied to the incentive portion of this fixed-price incentive contract, and how did it impact the final cost to taxpayers?

The incentive structure likely focused on operational efficiency, security metrics, or inmate satisfaction. If the contractor exceeded performance targets, taxpayers might have paid a premium, but potentially received superior service. Conversely, failing to meet targets could have resulted in reduced profit for the contractor, but the base price remained fixed. Detailed performance reports and final cost breakdowns are needed to fully assess the incentive's impact.

Given the long duration and significant value, what were the primary risks identified during the competition phase, and how were they mitigated?

Key risks likely included contractor default, cost overruns, security breaches, and service quality degradation. Mitigation strategies might have involved robust performance bonds, detailed service level agreements, regular audits, and contingency plans for contractor failure. The 'full and open competition' suggests that potential bidders were evaluated on their risk management approaches.

How does the per-unit cost of operating this contractor-owned facility compare to government-owned and operated facilities, considering all associated costs?

Direct comparison is challenging without detailed cost breakdowns for both models. Contractor-owned facilities may offer upfront cost savings or specialized expertise, but long-term operational costs, including profit margins and potential for price increases, need careful evaluation against government-run facilities. A comprehensive analysis would require data on staffing, maintenance, utilities, and administrative overhead for both scenarios.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICESSOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: PCC-RFO-0005

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE (L)

Contractor Details

Address: 10 BURTON HILLS BLVD STE 100, NASHVILLE, TN, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $369,309,993

Exercised Options: $369,309,993

Current Obligation: $158,727,272

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2000-06-09

Current End Date: 2010-09-30

Potential End Date: 2010-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-09-13

More Contracts from Corecivic, Inc.

View all Corecivic, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending