DOI's Bureau of Reclamation awards $33.5M contract for armed security guard services in California

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $33,528,681 ($33.5M)

Contractor: Sacramento, County of

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2012-01-01

End Date: 2017-06-30

Contract Duration: 2,007 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FOLSOM ARMED SECURITY GUARD FORCE - BASE YEAR AND 4 OPTION YEARS.

Place of Performance

Location: FOLSOM, SACRAMENTO County, CALIFORNIA, 95630

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $33.5 million to SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF for work described as: FOLSOM ARMED SECURITY GUARD FORCE - BASE YEAR AND 4 OPTION YEARS. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for armed security guard services in California. 2. Total value of $33.5 million over base and 4 option years. 3. Procurement method was 'NOT COMPETED', raising potential competition concerns. 4. Services fall under 'Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities' sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $33.5 million for armed security guard services over five years needs comparison to similar federal or state contracts. Without benchmarks, assessing if this price is competitive is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was 'NOT COMPETED', indicating a limited competition approach. This method may not have resulted in the best possible price discovery for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of full competition could mean taxpayers are not receiving the most cost-effective service.

Public Impact

Ensures public safety and security at Bureau of Reclamation facilities. Supports local employment through security guard positions. Provides essential services for critical infrastructure protection.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for overpayment due to non-competitive award
Limited transparency in pricing

Positive Signals

Essential service provision
Long-term contract potentially offering stability

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under 'Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities,' a broad category. Benchmarking security guard costs requires comparison with similar contracts for armed personnel in similar geographic regions.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this procurement. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' award status suggests a need for robust oversight to ensure the justification for limited competition was sound and that the price was fair and reasonable.

Related Government Programs

Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Department of the Interior Contracting
Bureau of Reclamation Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for inflated pricing
Limited transparency
Absence of performance metrics in provided data
Unclear justification for sole-source award

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $33.5 million to SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF. FOLSOM ARMED SECURITY GUARD FORCE - BASE YEAR AND 4 OPTION YEARS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Bureau of Reclamation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $33.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-01-01. End: 2017-06-30.

What was the justification for not competing this contract, and was it adequately documented?

The justification for not competing this contract is not provided in the data. Typically, agencies must document reasons such as urgent and compelling needs, or the availability of only one responsible source. Without this documentation, it's difficult to assess the validity of the limited competition approach and ensure taxpayer funds were used appropriately.

How does the per-unit cost of these security guards compare to industry averages or other government contracts?

The provided data does not include per-unit cost details, making a direct comparison impossible. To assess value, one would need to analyze the hourly rates, number of guards, and specific services rendered against benchmarks for armed security personnel in California. This would reveal if the $33.5 million total represents a fair market price.

What measures were in place to ensure the effectiveness and quality of the security services provided under this non-competitive contract?

The data does not specify the quality assurance measures. For non-competitively awarded contracts, robust oversight is crucial. This includes clear performance standards, regular evaluations, and mechanisms for addressing deficiencies to ensure the Bureau of Reclamation receives effective security services despite the lack of competitive pressure.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Public Administration › Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities › Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: R11PS20215

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: County of Sacramento (UEI: 071550800)

Address: 901 ENTERPRISE DR STE 203, SACRAMENTO, CA, 95816

Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. Local Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $33,528,681

Exercised Options: $33,528,681

Current Obligation: $33,528,681

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Timeline