Humphreys & Harding, Inc. awarded $12.25M contract for construction services by National Park Service

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,251,446 ($12.3M)

Contractor: Humphreys & Harding, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2005-01-14

End Date: 2007-03-30

Contract Duration: 805 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: FEHA 79070

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $12.3 million to HUMPHREYS & HARDING, INC for work described as: FEHA 79070 Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 805 days indicates a significant project scope. 3. Fixed-price contract type may offer cost certainty for the government. 4. The award was made by the National Park Service, indicating a focus on infrastructure or facility development. 5. The contractor, Humphreys & Harding, Inc., has secured a substantial federal award. 6. The project is located in New York, potentially impacting the local construction economy.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific details on the scope of work and comparable projects. However, the award amount of over $12 million for a construction project spanning over two years suggests a significant undertaking. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor assumed the risk for cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government if the project is completed within budget. Further analysis would require comparing the cost per square foot or per unit of work against similar National Park Service projects or other large-scale construction contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 4 bids indicates a moderate level of competition for this project. A higher number of bidders generally suggests a more competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and value for the government. However, the specific nature of the construction project and the qualifications required of the contractor could influence the number of interested parties.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it promotes a wider range of offers, potentially driving down costs and ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment.

Public Impact

The National Park Service benefits from the completion of necessary construction or renovation projects, enhancing visitor experiences and facility functionality. The construction services delivered will likely involve skilled labor, potentially creating or supporting jobs within the construction industry in New York. The geographic impact is concentrated in New York, where the construction activities will take place. The project's success contributes to the preservation and improvement of national park infrastructure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if the fixed-price contract does not adequately account for unforeseen construction challenges.
Dependence on the contractor's ability to manage project timelines effectively over the 805-day duration.
Risk associated with the specific expertise of Humphreys & Harding, Inc. for the particular type of construction required by the National Park Service.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a potentially competitive pricing structure.
Firm fixed-price contract type provides budget certainty for the government.
The contractor, Humphreys & Harding, Inc., has secured a significant federal contract, suggesting a level of established capability.

Sector Analysis

The construction industry is a vital sector for federal spending, encompassing a wide range of projects from building maintenance to large-scale infrastructure development. Federal contracts in this sector often involve significant dollar amounts due to the complexity and scale of the work. This contract for commercial and institutional building construction falls within a broad category that supports government operations and public facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the cost per square foot for similar government buildings or the total value of construction contracts awarded by agencies like the National Park Service annually.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Humphreys & Harding, Inc. voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors. Further investigation into the subcontracting plan would be necessary to assess the broader implications for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the National Park Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the specified work within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed project progress and specific oversight activities may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

National Park Service Facility Management
Federal Building Construction Projects
Department of the Interior Infrastructure Spending
Commercial Building Contracts
Institutional Building Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns under fixed-price contract if scope is not well-defined.
Contract duration of 805 days requires robust project management to ensure timely completion.
Need to verify contractor's past performance on similar federal construction projects.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $12.3 million to HUMPHREYS & HARDING, INC. FEHA 79070

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HUMPHREYS & HARDING, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (National Park Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-01-14. End: 2007-03-30.

What is the specific scope of work for this construction contract awarded to Humphreys & Harding, Inc.?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' (NAICS code 236220) awarded by the National Park Service. However, the precise scope of work, such as whether it involves new construction, renovation, repair, or specific types of facilities (e.g., visitor centers, administrative buildings, housing), is not detailed. This information is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the contract's purpose and value. Without this, it's difficult to assess if the $12.25 million award is commensurate with the expected deliverables.

How does the $12.25 million award compare to typical construction contract values for the National Park Service?

To benchmark this $12.25 million award, one would need to analyze historical National Park Service (NPS) construction contract data. This would involve looking at the average, median, and range of contract values for similar types of construction (commercial/institutional) over a relevant period. For instance, if the average NPS construction contract of this nature is typically between $5-10 million, then this award might be considered on the higher end, potentially indicating a larger or more complex project. Conversely, if the average is $15 million or more, this award could be seen as moderate. Access to NPS's historical contract spending data is necessary for a precise comparison.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and deliverables expected under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or detailed deliverables for this construction contract. Typically, for a construction project of this magnitude and duration (805 days), KPIs would likely include adherence to project schedules, quality of workmanship, safety compliance, and final project completion within the agreed-upon budget. Deliverables would encompass the finished construction or renovation, associated documentation (e.g., as-built drawings, warranties), and potentially post-construction support. The contracting officer's final decision would be based on the successful fulfillment of these unstated requirements.

What is the track record of Humphreys & Harding, Inc. in performing federal construction contracts of similar size and scope?

Assessing the track record of Humphreys & Harding, Inc. requires examining their past federal contract awards and performance history. This includes looking at the number and value of previous contracts, the agencies they have served, and any performance evaluations or past performance questionnaires (PPQs) associated with those contracts. A history of successfully completed projects of similar scale and complexity, particularly for agencies like the National Park Service, would indicate a lower risk profile. Conversely, a history of delays, cost overruns, or negative performance reviews would raise concerns about their capability to execute this current $12.25 million contract effectively.

How does the firm fixed-price contract type influence the risk allocation between the government and Humphreys & Harding, Inc.?

A firm fixed-price (FFP) contract, like the one awarded to Humphreys & Harding, Inc., places the primary risk of cost overruns on the contractor. This means that the contractor is obligated to complete the work for the agreed-upon price, regardless of their actual costs. This contract type is generally favored by the government when the scope of work is well-defined and the risks are manageable. For the government, it offers budget certainty. For the contractor, it provides the potential for higher profit margins if they can manage costs efficiently, but also the risk of losses if costs exceed the fixed price. This allocation encourages the contractor to be efficient and cost-conscious.

What is the historical spending pattern for commercial and institutional building construction by the National Park Service?

To understand the historical spending pattern for commercial and institutional building construction by the National Park Service (NPS), one would need to analyze multi-year federal procurement data. This analysis would involve aggregating spending on NAICS code 236220 (or similar relevant codes) by the NPS over several fiscal years. Key metrics to examine would include the total annual spending, the average contract value, the number of contracts awarded, and the primary contractors receiving these awards. Such a pattern could reveal trends in NPS infrastructure investment, identify periods of increased or decreased activity, and highlight the agency's reliance on specific types of construction services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation ID: N4500040923

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 755 2ND AVE FL 2, NEW YORK, NY, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,251,446

Exercised Options: $12,251,446

Current Obligation: $12,251,446

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline