Booz Allen Hamilton contract for administrative management consulting services awarded by the Department of the Interior

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,307,012 ($32.3M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2006-03-07

End Date: 2008-03-06

Contract Duration: 730 days

Daily Burn Rate: $44.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: 61231 BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON

Place of Performance

Location: MC LEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $32.3 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: 61231 BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 3. The contract duration was 730 days. 4. The contract was a Time and Materials type. 5. The contract was awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. 6. The contract was awarded by the Departmental Offices within the Department of the Interior.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

This contract for administrative management consulting services was awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. for a total value of $32,307,012.38. Without specific benchmarks for similar consulting services within the Department of the Interior or across federal agencies, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. The Time and Materials pricing structure can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely managed, but it also offers flexibility for evolving project needs. Further analysis would require comparison to industry standards and other government contracts for similar scope and duration.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely solicited and had the opportunity to bid. The presence of full and open competition generally suggests a robust marketplace for these services. The number of bidders is not specified, but the process itself implies that the government sought the best value through a competitive bidding environment, which should theoretically lead to more favorable pricing and service offerings.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it typically drives down costs and encourages innovation among contractors vying for the award. This process aims to ensure that government funds are used efficiently by selecting the most cost-effective and capable provider.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are likely the various offices within the Department of the Interior that require administrative management and general management consulting expertise. The services delivered would have supported the department's operational efficiency, strategic planning, and overall management functions. The geographic impact is primarily within the purview of the Department of the Interior's operations, which are nationwide. The contract would have supported a workforce of consultants, likely including project managers, analysts, and subject matter experts, contributing to employment in the consulting sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost uncertainty if not managed rigorously.
Lack of specific performance metrics or outcomes makes it difficult to assess the true impact of the consulting services.
The broad nature of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' could encompass a wide range of activities, making specific value assessment challenging without detailed task orders.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process that should yield better value.
Contract awarded to a well-established firm (Booz Allen Hamilton) with a significant track record in government contracting.
The contract duration of two years allowed for sustained support to the agency's management needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, with agencies frequently engaging consultants for strategic advice, operational improvements, and specialized expertise. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous large and small firms vying for government contracts. Benchmarking would require comparing this contract's value and scope to other similar consulting engagements within federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have been specifically set aside for small businesses, as indicated by the 'sb': false flag. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. is a large business. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award is likely minimal, unless the prime contractor voluntarily engaged small business subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the contracting officers and program managers within the Department of the Interior. As a Time and Materials contract, rigorous oversight of labor hours and direct costs would be crucial to ensure compliance and prevent cost overruns. Transparency would be facilitated through contract reporting mechanisms, though specific details on public accessibility of performance reports are not provided. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Management and Financial Consulting, Acquisition and Commercialization
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Federal Consulting Services
Department of the Interior Administrative Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing structure.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment difficult.
Broad scope of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' may obscure specific outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $32.3 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. 61231 BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Departmental Offices).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-03-07. End: 2008-03-06.

What was the specific scope of work for these administrative management and general management consulting services?

The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS code 541611). However, the specific scope of work is not detailed. Typically, such services can encompass a wide range of activities including organizational analysis, strategic planning, process improvement, program management support, policy development, and general administrative efficiency enhancements. Without access to the contract's statement of work or task orders, the precise deliverables and objectives remain unspecified. This lack of detail makes it challenging to fully assess the contract's effectiveness or value.

How does the awarded amount of $32.3 million compare to similar consulting contracts within the Department of the Interior or other federal agencies?

Comparing the $32.3 million award to similar contracts requires access to a broader dataset of federal procurement. However, for a two-year duration (730 days), this represents an average annual value of approximately $16.15 million. This figure is substantial and suggests a significant engagement. Large federal consulting contracts can range widely, but this amount is within the expected scale for major management consulting support to a large federal agency like the Department of the Interior. Benchmarking against contracts for similar NAICS codes (541611) and contract types (Time and Materials) across different agencies would provide a more precise comparison of value and pricing.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract?

The provided data does not include information on Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or specific metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract. For Time and Materials contracts, performance is often assessed based on the successful completion of defined tasks, adherence to labor hour limitations, and client satisfaction. However, without the contract's statement of work or performance work statement, it is impossible to determine the specific criteria against which Booz Allen Hamilton's performance was measured. Effective government contracts typically include measurable outcomes to ensure accountability and value for taxpayer money.

What is Booz Allen Hamilton's track record with the Department of the Interior and for similar consulting services?

Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. is a major government contractor with a long-standing presence across numerous federal agencies, including the Department of the Interior. Their track record generally includes extensive experience in providing management and technology consulting services. While this specific contract award of $32.3 million is a significant data point, a comprehensive assessment of their track record would involve reviewing past performance evaluations, any past performance issues or awards, and the overall volume and nature of their work with the Department of the Interior and other agencies for similar service categories (NAICS 541611).

What are the potential risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract of this magnitude?

Time and Materials contracts, like this one, carry inherent risks, primarily related to cost control. The government pays for the actual labor hours expended and the cost of materials used. Without strict oversight and well-defined ceilings, there is a risk of cost overruns if the project takes longer than anticipated or if labor hours are not efficiently utilized. For a contract of $32.3 million over two years, effective management by the government contracting team is crucial to monitor hours, rates, and material costs to ensure the project stays within budget and delivers value. Scope creep can also be a significant risk, as T&M contracts can sometimes incentivize longer project durations rather than efficient completion.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC., MC LEAN, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $32,307,012

Exercised Options: $32,307,012

Current Obligation: $32,307,012

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: INN04PC10700

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline