HUD awards $13.9M IT software support contract to The MIL Corporation for one year

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,879,997 ($13.9M)

Contractor: THE MIL Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development

Start Date: 2004-09-28

End Date: 2005-09-28

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $38.0K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20415

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated $13.9 million to THE MIL CORPORATION for work described as: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in IT infrastructure maintenance. 2. Competition dynamics for this contract will be assessed to understand pricing efficiency. 3. Performance history of The MIL Corporation will be reviewed for reliability. 4. This contract falls within the broader context of federal IT modernization efforts. 5. The IT services sector is characterized by rapid technological change and evolving needs. 6. Spending on IT software support is a critical component of agency operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $13.9 million for one year of IT software support appears within a reasonable range for federal IT services. However, without specific details on the scope of services, it's difficult to benchmark against similar contracts precisely. The fixed-price nature suggests a defined scope, but potential for cost overruns exists if not managed effectively. Further analysis would require comparing the per-unit cost of specific services against market rates or historical agency spending for similar support.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors likely had the opportunity to bid. The presence of six bidders suggests a reasonably competitive environment, which should theoretically drive more favorable pricing for the government. The specific details of the bidding process and the number of proposals received would provide a clearer picture of the actual level of competition and its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process generally benefits taxpayers by fostering price competition and potentially leading to lower overall costs for essential IT services.

Public Impact

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) benefits from enhanced IT software support, ensuring the continuity of its critical operations. Essential IT software support services are delivered, maintaining the functionality of agency systems. The primary geographic impact is within the District of Columbia, where HUD's headquarters are located. The contract supports jobs within the IT services sector, contributing to the federal workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector is a vast and dynamic market, with federal spending on software support being a significant segment. This contract for $13.9 million fits within the broader category of IT professional services, which includes a wide range of activities from software development to maintenance and support. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar IT software support contracts within federal agencies can vary widely based on the complexity of the systems supported and the level of service required.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless The MIL Corporation voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed for a comprehensive assessment.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within HUD responsible for IT services. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price delivery order structure, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within budget. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it-services, software-support, information-technology, hud, department-of-housing-and-urban-development, competitive-delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, district-of-columbia, the-mil-corporation, it-professional-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded $13.9 million to THE MIL CORPORATION. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE MIL CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development (Department of Housing and Urban Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-09-28. End: 2005-09-28.

What is the specific scope of IT software support services covered under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE SUPPORT SERVICES' awarded to The MIL CORPORATION by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). However, the specific scope of services is not detailed. Typically, such contracts encompass a range of activities including software maintenance, bug fixing, technical support, system updates, and potentially minor enhancements for HUD's IT systems. The exact nature of the software supported (e.g., COTS, custom-developed applications, operating systems) would further define the scope. Without the detailed statement of work, a precise understanding of the services rendered remains limited.

How does the $13.9 million contract value compare to historical IT software support spending by HUD?

To assess the value, a comparison with HUD's historical IT software support spending is necessary. The provided data shows this is a one-year delivery order valued at $13.9 million, awarded on September 28, 2004, with an end date of September 28, 2005. Without access to HUD's budget allocations and actual expenditures for IT software support in preceding or subsequent years, it is difficult to determine if this amount represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment. Analyzing trends over several fiscal years would provide better context on whether this contract represents a significant shift in spending.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate The MIL Corporation's performance on this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. In federal IT software support contracts, common KPIs often include metrics such as response time to support requests, resolution time for issues, system uptime and availability, customer satisfaction ratings, and adherence to service level agreements (SLAs). The contracting officer and program managers at HUD would be responsible for monitoring these KPIs to ensure The MIL Corporation is meeting its contractual obligations. The effectiveness of oversight and performance management directly impacts the value received by the government.

What is The MIL Corporation's track record with federal IT support contracts, particularly with HUD?

The data indicates The MIL Corporation was awarded this $13.9 million contract for IT software support services by HUD. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their past performance on similar federal contracts. This includes reviewing past performance evaluations, any contract disputes or terminations, and the overall success rate in delivering IT support services. A positive history with HUD or other federal agencies would suggest a lower performance risk, while a history of issues might raise concerns about their capability to fulfill this contract effectively.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Potential risks for this IT software support contract include vendor lock-in, performance failures, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and cost overruns if the fixed-price model is not strictly managed. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight, clearly defined performance standards and SLAs, regular performance reviews, and contingency planning. The competitive nature of the award (6 bidders) suggests a degree of market vetting. However, ongoing monitoring by HUD's contracting officer and technical points of contact is crucial to identify and address any emerging risks throughout the contract period.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesOther Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 4000 MITCHELLVILLE RD A21, BOWIE, MD, 20716

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,879,997

Exercised Options: $13,879,997

Current Obligation: $13,879,997

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F4670G

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-09-28

Current End Date: 2005-09-28

Potential End Date: 2010-09-27 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-11-25

More Contracts from THE MIL Corporation

View all THE MIL Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Housing and Urban Development Contracts

View all Department of Housing and Urban Development contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending