HUD awards $111M for REO Marketing & Management Services across CA, HI, GA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $111,381,926 ($111.4M)

Contractor: Pemco, Limited

Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development

Start Date: 2004-08-01

End Date: 2010-01-31

Contract Duration: 2,009 days

Daily Burn Rate: $55.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: Other

Official Description: SINGLE FAMILY REO MARKETING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR CALIFORNIA, HAWAII & GEORGIA

Place of Performance

Location: ATLANTA, FULTON County, GEORGIA, 30303

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated $111.4 million to PEMCO, LIMITED for work described as: SINGLE FAMILY REO MARKETING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR CALIFORNIA, HAWAII & GEORGIA Key points: 1. Contract awarded to PEMCO, Limited for REO marketing and management. 2. Services cover single-family residential properties in California, Hawaii, and Georgia. 3. The contract duration spans from August 2004 to January 2010. 4. This falls under the Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings NAICS code. 5. The award value is approximately $111.4 million.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $111.4 million over approximately 5.5 years suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking against similar property management contracts would be necessary to assess if this pricing is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method is generally expected to yield fair market prices.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for managing foreclosed single-family homes, aiming to mitigate losses and maintain property value.

Public Impact

Ensures proper management and marketing of foreclosed homes, potentially stabilizing local housing markets. Supports the Department of Housing and Urban Development's mission in managing its real estate owned (REO) portfolio. Provides services that could impact property values and neighborhood aesthetics in affected areas. The contract's success relies on efficient property maintenance and timely sales.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The real estate services sector involves property management, marketing, and sales. Spending benchmarks for such services can vary widely based on property type, location, and market conditions.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to small businesses (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or achieved through subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight by the Department of Housing and Urban Development is crucial to ensure PEMCO, Limited fulfills its contractual obligations effectively and efficiently, safeguarding taxpayer interests.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

lessors-of-residential-buildings-and-dwe, department-of-housing-and-urban-developm, ga, dca, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded $111.4 million to PEMCO, LIMITED. SINGLE FAMILY REO MARKETING & MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR CALIFORNIA, HAWAII & GEORGIA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PEMCO, LIMITED.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development (Department of Housing and Urban Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $111.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-08-01. End: 2010-01-31.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate PEMCO, Limited's success in marketing and managing these properties?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate PEMCO, Limited's success. Typically, such contracts would include metrics related to property maintenance, marketing timelines, sale prices achieved relative to market value, and tenant/buyer satisfaction. Without these KPIs, a thorough assessment of the contract's value and effectiveness is challenging.

How did the full and open competition process ensure the best possible price for these property management services?

Full and open competition theoretically ensures the best price by allowing all qualified vendors to submit bids, fostering a competitive environment. The agency then selects the offer that provides the best value, considering both price and other factors. However, the actual effectiveness depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the number and quality of bids received, and the evaluation criteria used by HUD.

What was the estimated taxpayer impact of managing these REO properties versus alternative approaches?

The taxpayer impact is tied to the cost of services ($111.4M) versus the potential recovery from selling the properties. Effective management should minimize holding costs, prevent further deterioration, and maximize sale prices, thereby reducing the net cost to taxpayers. Alternative approaches might include direct agency management or different disposition strategies, each with its own cost-benefit profile.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Real Estate and Rental and LeasingLessors of Real EstateLessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Contractor Details

Address: 1632 S. KING STREET, SUITE 100, HONOLULU, HI, 01

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $111,381,926

Exercised Options: $111,381,926

Current Obligation: $111,381,926

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-08-01

Current End Date: 2010-01-31

Potential End Date: 2010-01-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2014-08-06

More Contracts from Pemco, Limited

View all Pemco, Limited federal contracts →

Other Department of Housing and Urban Development Contracts

View all Department of Housing and Urban Development contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending