HUD's $51.6M SF REO M&M Contract Awarded to BESTASSETS, Inc. for Multi-State Region

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $51,560,140 ($51.6M)

Contractor: Bestassets, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development

Start Date: 2004-08-01

End Date: 2010-01-31

Contract Duration: 2,009 days

Daily Burn Rate: $25.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: Other

Official Description: SF REO M&M CONTRACT FOR ND, SD, NE, MN, WI, IA

Place of Performance

Location: MINNEAPOLIS, HENNEPIN County, MINNESOTA, 55402

State: Minnesota Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated $51.6 million to BESTASSETS, INC for work described as: SF REO M&M CONTRACT FOR ND, SD, NE, MN, WI, IA Key points: 1. Contract awarded to BESTASSETS, Inc. for property management services. 2. The contract covers a significant multi-state region (ND, SD, NE, MN, WI, IA). 3. Full and open competition was utilized after exclusion of sources, suggesting a competitive process. 4. The sector appears to be related to real estate and property management within the housing sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $51.6 million over approximately 5.5 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar property management contracts would be necessary to fully assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates an initial exclusion, followed by a competitive process. The impact on price discovery depends on the specifics of the exclusion and the subsequent competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for property management services, the efficiency and effectiveness of which will determine the ultimate taxpayer impact.

Public Impact

Ensures maintenance and management of residential properties, potentially impacting housing availability and quality. Supports the Department of Housing and Urban Development's mission in managing its real estate portfolio. The multi-state scope suggests a broad impact on regional housing markets and local economies.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Real Estate and Property Management sector, specifically related to residential dwellings. Federal spending in this area is often tied to agency asset management and housing programs. Benchmarks would typically compare per-unit management costs or percentage of property value.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses. The contract was awarded to BESTASSETS, INC, and further analysis would be needed to determine if they are a small business or if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be conducted by the Department of Housing and Urban Development's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability would be measured against contract terms, performance standards, and service level agreements.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

lessors-of-residential-buildings-and-dwe, department-of-housing-and-urban-developm, mn, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded $51.6 million to BESTASSETS, INC. SF REO M&M CONTRACT FOR ND, SD, NE, MN, WI, IA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BESTASSETS, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development (Department of Housing and Urban Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $51.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-08-01. End: 2010-01-31.

What specific services are included under 'M&M' (Management & Maintenance) for these residential properties, and how are they quantified?

The 'M&M' likely encompasses a range of services including tenant relations, rent collection, property upkeep, repairs, and ensuring compliance with housing regulations. Quantifying these services would involve metrics like units managed, maintenance requests resolved, vacancy rates, and tenant satisfaction scores, which are crucial for assessing performance and value.

What was the rationale for excluding certain sources before the 'full and open competition' phase, and did this exclusion impact the final price?

Excluding sources prior to full and open competition typically occurs when there's a specific justification, such as a need for specialized capabilities or to address prior performance issues. The impact on price is variable; while it might limit initial competition, the subsequent open phase aims to drive competitive pricing. Understanding the initial exclusion's basis is key to assessing its price impact.

How does the performance of BESTASSETS, INC. on this contract compare to industry benchmarks for residential property management in the covered states?

Comparing BESTASSETS, INC.'s performance requires access to specific contract metrics such as cost per unit managed, maintenance turnaround times, tenant retention rates, and property condition reports. Benchmarking against similar contracts or private sector property management firms in ND, SD, NE, MN, WI, and IA would reveal efficiency, effectiveness, and overall value for taxpayer money.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Real Estate and Rental and LeasingLessors of Real EstateLessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12808 W AIRPORT BLVD STE 260, SUGAR LAND, TX, 22

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $51,560,140

Exercised Options: $51,560,140

Current Obligation: $51,560,140

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-08-01

Current End Date: 2010-01-31

Potential End Date: 2010-01-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-08-27

More Contracts from Bestassets, Inc

View all Bestassets, Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Housing and Urban Development Contracts

View all Department of Housing and Urban Development contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending