DoD awards $8.1M patient transport contract to RWD Consulting LLC, a 3-year firm fixed-price delivery order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,130,234 ($8.1M)

Contractor: RWD Consulting LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-10-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: PATIENT TRANSPORT

Place of Performance

Location: BETHESDA, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20889

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $8.1 million to RWD CONSULTING LLC for work described as: PATIENT TRANSPORT Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a 3-year patient transport service. 2. Full and open competition after exclusion of sources suggests a deliberate procurement strategy. 3. Potential risk indicators include the specific exclusion of sources, requiring further scrutiny. 4. Performance context is within facilities support services, a critical area for military healthcare. 5. This contract positions RWD Consulting within the healthcare support services sector for the DoD. 6. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $8.1 million over three years for patient transport services seems aligned with industry standards for similar support contracts within the Department of Defense. Benchmarking against other patient transport contracts awarded by the Defense Health Agency or similar entities would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract helps in managing cost predictability.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific sources were excluded for defined reasons, possibly related to specialized capabilities or prior performance. The number of bidders is not specified, but the exclusion suggests a narrowed field from the outset, potentially impacting the full spectrum of price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: While competition was not entirely unrestricted, the exclusion of sources implies a rationale that should ensure the selected contractor meets specific, potentially critical, requirements. Taxpayers benefit from a contractor chosen through a competitive process, even if limited, rather than a sole-source award.

Public Impact

Beneficiaries include military personnel and their families requiring patient transport services. Services delivered encompass the logistical movement of patients within or between healthcare facilities. Geographic impact is likely concentrated around the specific military installation(s) served by the Defense Health Agency. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities for drivers, dispatchers, and support staff managed by RWD Consulting LLC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The healthcare support services sector is a vital component of the federal procurement landscape, particularly for agencies like the Department of Defense. This contract for patient transport falls under facilities support services, a market segment characterized by the need for reliable, efficient, and often specialized logistical operations. Comparable spending benchmarks in this area are typically assessed based on the volume of services, geographic scope, and required response times.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) was not a specific set-aside criterion for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or immediate impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a small business set-aside. The focus appears to be on securing the required services through the most appropriate competitive means.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) or equivalent within the Defense Health Agency. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of services as specified. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, although detailed performance reports are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

healthcare, defense, department-of-defense, defense-health-agency, facilities-support-services, patient-transport, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, limited-competition, maryland, rwd-consulting-llc

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $8.1 million to RWD CONSULTING LLC. PATIENT TRANSPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RWD CONSULTING LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Health Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the specific rationale behind the 'Exclusion of Sources' in this 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' designation suggests that while the procurement was intended to be competitive, certain potential offerors were deliberately excluded from the bidding process. The specific rationale for this exclusion is not detailed in the provided data but typically stems from reasons such as the need for highly specialized capabilities, proprietary technology, or prior performance issues with specific companies. Agencies must justify such exclusions to ensure fairness and compliance with procurement regulations. Understanding this rationale is crucial for assessing whether the competition was truly optimized for best value and to prevent potential protests or challenges.

How does the $8.1 million contract value compare to similar patient transport services awarded by the Defense Health Agency?

Without access to a comprehensive database of comparable Defense Health Agency (DHA) contracts for patient transport, a precise benchmark is difficult. However, an $8.1 million award over three years ($2.7 million annually) for patient transport services appears to be within a reasonable range for a medium-sized support contract. Factors influencing this value include the geographic area served, the volume and types of transports (e.g., emergency vs. routine), the required fleet size and maintenance, and staffing levels. A detailed comparison would involve analyzing contracts with similar scopes of work, durations, and performance periods within the DHA or other military branches.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) RWD Consulting LLC is expected to meet under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for RWD Consulting LLC. However, for a patient transport contract, typical KPIs would likely include metrics such as on-time arrival rates, patient safety incident rates, vehicle maintenance and availability, response times for different service levels (e.g., emergency vs. scheduled), and customer satisfaction. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that meeting these performance standards is essential for successful contract completion and payment, though specific penalties or incentives related to KPIs are not detailed here.

What is the track record of RWD Consulting LLC in performing similar federal contracts?

Information regarding RWD Consulting LLC's specific track record with federal contracts, particularly in patient transport or similar healthcare support services, is not included in the provided data. A thorough assessment would require reviewing their past performance evaluations in federal databases (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) and examining the types and values of previous contracts they have held. This would help determine their experience, reliability, and capability in fulfilling the requirements of this new award.

What is the potential impact of the 'Exclusion of Sources' on the overall cost-effectiveness for taxpayers?

The 'Exclusion of Sources' can have a mixed impact on cost-effectiveness for taxpayers. On one hand, if the exclusion is based on a well-justified need for specialized capabilities or to avoid known performance issues, it can lead to selecting a contractor better equipped to deliver the required services efficiently and effectively, potentially reducing long-term costs associated with poor performance or rework. On the other hand, if the exclusion unnecessarily limits the pool of qualified bidders, it could reduce competitive pressure, potentially leading to higher initial prices than might be achieved in a truly open market. The specific justification for the exclusion is key to evaluating this impact.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesFacilities Support ServicesFacilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: HT001419R0021

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1775 T ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20009

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,391,945

Exercised Options: $10,618,698

Current Obligation: $8,130,234

Actual Outlays: $843,030

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HT001421D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-10-01

Current End Date: 2026-09-30

Potential End Date: 2027-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-08

More Contracts from RWD Consulting LLC

View all RWD Consulting LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending