Leidos Inc. awarded $113.3M for HR Access IDIQ Option Period 5 by DHS TSA
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $113,328,456 ($113.3M)
Contractor: Leidos Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Start Date: 2014-01-02
End Date: 2015-01-31
Contract Duration: 394 days
Daily Burn Rate: $287.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::CL,CT::IGF THE PURPOSE OF TASK ORDER HSTS01-14-J-HRM025 IS TO FUND THE OPTION PERIOD 5 CLINS AS EXERCISED IN MODIFICATION P00103 TO THE HRACCESS INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT HSTS01-08-D-HRM010.
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Homeland Security obligated $113.3 million to LEIDOS INC for work described as: IGF::CL,CT::IGF THE PURPOSE OF TASK ORDER HSTS01-14-J-HRM025 IS TO FUND THE OPTION PERIOD 5 CLINS AS EXERCISED IN MODIFICATION P00103 TO THE HRACCESS INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT HSTS01-08-D-HRM010. Key points: 1. Contract provides funding for the fifth option period of an existing HR Access IDIQ contract. 2. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating a defined scope and cost. 3. Awarded by the Department of Homeland Security's Transportation Security Administration. 4. The contract duration is 394 days, covering a period from January 2014 to January 2015. 5. This award represents continued investment in human resources consulting services. 6. The contract was awarded using full and open competition.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $113.3 million for a 394-day period suggests a significant investment in HR services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale HR consulting contracts would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price structure implies that the government has a clear understanding of the costs involved, which can be a positive indicator for cost control.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to compete for this work. This process is designed to foster a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the method itself suggests a robust competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by promoting a marketplace where contractors strive to offer the best value, potentially driving down costs and improving service quality through competitive pressures.
Public Impact
Employees of the Department of Homeland Security, particularly within the Transportation Security Administration, will benefit from improved human resources services. The services delivered are focused on human resources consulting, likely encompassing areas such as personnel management, payroll, benefits, and other HR-related functions. The geographic impact is primarily within the operational areas of the TSA, with potential for broader DHS application. Workforce implications include the potential for specialized HR professionals to be engaged in supporting federal agencies.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The significant dollar value could indicate a reliance on a single large contractor, potentially limiting future competition if not managed carefully.
- The duration of the contract (over a year) means that market dynamics and technological advancements in HR services might evolve, potentially impacting the long-term value proposition.
Positive Signals
- The use of an IDIQ contract structure suggests a pre-established relationship and a streamlined process for task orders, which can lead to efficiency.
- Awarding under full and open competition is a positive signal for market engagement and potential cost-effectiveness.
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on human resources consulting. This sector is characterized by a wide range of service providers, from large system integrators to specialized consulting firms. The market size for federal HR consulting services is substantial, driven by the need for agencies to manage large workforces efficiently and compliantly. This contract represents a portion of that broader spending, supporting critical functions within a major federal agency.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a large contract awarded through full and open competition, it is likely that larger prime contractors, such as Leidos Inc., will be involved. There is potential for small businesses to participate as subcontractors, depending on the prime contractor's subcontracting plan and the specific nature of the HR services required. However, without explicit subcontracting data, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem remains to be seen.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Homeland Security's contracting and program management offices. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) would be responsible for monitoring performance and ensuring compliance with the contract terms. As a task order under an IDIQ, the oversight mechanisms are likely integrated into the broader IDIQ contract management framework. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific details of ongoing oversight are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- HR Access IDIQ Contract
- Human Resources Management Services
- Federal Workforce Management
- Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- Transportation Security Administration Services
Risk Flags
- Potential for contractor performance issues
- Risk of evolving HR requirements impacting scope
- Dependency on key personnel retention
Tags
human-resources, consulting-services, department-of-homeland-security, transportation-security-administration, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, leidos-inc, virginia, option-period
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Homeland Security awarded $113.3 million to LEIDOS INC. IGF::CL,CT::IGF THE PURPOSE OF TASK ORDER HSTS01-14-J-HRM025 IS TO FUND THE OPTION PERIOD 5 CLINS AS EXERCISED IN MODIFICATION P00103 TO THE HRACCESS INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) CONTRACT HSTS01-08-D-HRM010.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $113.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2014-01-02. End: 2015-01-31.
What is the historical spending trend for the HR Access IDIQ contract, and how does this option period compare?
The provided data focuses on a specific task order for Option Period 5 of the HR Access IDIQ contract, totaling $113.3 million. To understand the historical spending trend, one would need to examine all awarded task orders under the parent IDIQ contract (HSTS01-08-D-HRM010) since its inception. This would involve analyzing the cumulative value of all exercised options and awarded task orders, as well as their respective durations and scopes. Comparing Option Period 5's value to previous periods would reveal whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained stable. Without access to the full contract history and all associated modifications and task orders, a comprehensive trend analysis is not possible. However, the significant value of this single option period suggests a substantial and ongoing requirement for HR services by the TSA.
How does the per-unit cost of services under this contract benchmark against industry standards for HR consulting?
Determining a precise per-unit cost benchmark for this contract is challenging without more granular data on the specific services delivered and their associated units. The contract is for 'Human Resources Consulting Services' under a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) award, with a total value of $113.3 million over 394 days. To benchmark, we would need to identify comparable metrics, such as cost per employee supported, cost per HR transaction processed, or cost per hour for specific consulting expertise. Industry benchmarks for HR consulting vary widely based on the complexity of services, the level of expertise required, and the geographic location. For instance, large-scale HR system implementation or ongoing HR support for tens of thousands of employees would have different per-unit costs than specialized strategic HR advisory services. Given the scale and the nature of federal HR operations, it is likely that the per-unit costs are competitive within the government contracting space, especially considering the full and open competition.
What is Leidos Inc.'s track record with the Department of Homeland Security and specifically the TSA?
Leidos Inc. has a significant track record of performing contracts for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its various components, including the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). As a major government contractor, Leidos provides a wide array of services across different agencies, often involving IT, logistics, and professional services. Their history with DHS likely includes numerous successful contract awards and task orders, demonstrating their capability to meet the agency's complex requirements. The fact that they were awarded this substantial task order under the HR Access IDIQ, which is a modification to an existing contract, suggests a positive past performance and a continued trust from the TSA in Leidos's ability to deliver HR consulting services. A detailed review of past performance evaluations and contract histories would provide a more in-depth understanding of their specific performance on similar contracts.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are likely in place?
Primary risks associated with this contract include potential scope creep if the HR requirements evolve beyond the initial definition, performance issues if the contractor fails to deliver services meeting quality standards, and potential cost overruns if the FFP structure is not managed effectively against unforeseen challenges. Another risk could be the contractor's ability to retain key personnel with the necessary HR expertise throughout the contract period. Mitigation strategies likely include robust contract management by the TSA, clear definition and monitoring of performance metrics (e.g., service level agreements), regular progress reviews, and strong communication channels with Leidos Inc. The FFP nature itself acts as a cost mitigation tool, shifting some financial risk to the contractor. Furthermore, the IDIQ structure may allow for adjustments through subsequent modifications if requirements genuinely change, provided they are properly justified and funded.
How does the level of competition (full and open) typically influence the pricing and quality of services for federal HR consulting?
A 'full and open competition' process is designed to maximize the number of potential bidders, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive proposals. For federal HR consulting services, this generally translates into downward pressure on pricing as contractors vie for the award. Companies are incentivized to offer their best rates and most efficient service delivery models to win the contract. Beyond price, a competitive environment also encourages contractors to differentiate themselves on the quality of their services, innovation, and ability to meet specific agency needs. Agencies can leverage this competition to secure not only cost savings but also access to a broader range of expertise and potentially more effective solutions for their human resources challenges. The TSA's decision to use this procurement method suggests a desire to achieve both cost-effectiveness and high-quality service delivery.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Human Resources Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 2650 PARK TOWER DR, VIENNA, VA, 22180
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $113,328,456
Exercised Options: $113,328,456
Current Obligation: $113,328,456
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: HSTS0108DHRM010
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2014-01-02
Current End Date: 2015-01-31
Potential End Date: 2015-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2019-08-06
More Contracts from Leidos Inc
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- THE United States Coast Guard HAS a Requirement to Procure UP to Twenty-Six (26) Fast Response Cutters (frcs) on a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Basis With an Economic Price Adjustment (EPA). Phase II of the FRC Program Will Complete the Fleet for a Total of 58 Cutters — $2.1B (Bollinger Shipyards Lockport, L.L.C.)
- Design and Construct NEW Vertical Barrier and Power Distribution, Lighting, Cameras, Equipment Shelters and Linear Ground Detection System (lgds) in Hildago County, NM — $1.8B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Production&delivery of National Security Cutter (NSC) 6 — $1.7B (Huntington Ingalls Incorporated)
- YUM-2 Vertical Border and Waterborne Barrier Construction — $1.7B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Construct Vertical Border Barrier — $1.6B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)