DHS awards $33.6M consulting contract to Booz Allen Hamilton under BPA, citing administrative management services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $33,608,386 ($33.6M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2007-09-29

End Date: 2009-01-15

Contract Duration: 474 days

Daily Burn Rate: $70.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Sector: Other

Official Description: TASK ORDER AGAINST BPA HSHQDC-07-A-00038

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $33.6 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: TASK ORDER AGAINST BPA HSHQDC-07-A-00038 Key points: 1. Contract value of $33.6M for administrative management consulting. 2. Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, a large, established contractor. 3. Procurement method was 'NOT COMPETED' under a BPA call. 4. Services fall under the 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' NAICS code.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $33.6M is substantial for consulting services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for administrative management consulting is difficult without more specific service details, but the amount suggests a significant scope of work.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was not competed, indicating it was likely awarded under specific conditions of the Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA). This limits price discovery and competitive pressure, potentially leading to higher costs than a fully competed contract.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are used for this contract. The lack of competition means there's a risk of overpayment compared to what might have been achieved through a competitive process.

Public Impact

Federal agencies rely on consulting services for various management and administrative functions. The use of BPAs can streamline procurement but requires careful oversight to ensure fair pricing. Transparency in non-competed contract awards is crucial for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Not Competed
Large Contract Value
No Small Business Set-Aside

Positive Signals

Utilizes existing BPA
Specific NAICS code identified

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management consulting. Spending in this area can vary widely depending on agency needs, but large contracts like this are common for complex administrative tasks.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the awardee, Booz Allen Hamilton, is a large corporation. This indicates no direct benefit to small businesses in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status warrants scrutiny. Oversight should focus on the justification for not competing and ensuring the BPA terms provided fair value. The award was made under a BPA call, suggesting a pre-negotiated framework.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Department of Homeland Security Contracting
Office of Procurement Operations Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of Competition
Potential for Overpricing
No Small Business Participation
Long Contract Duration (474 days)
Large Contract Value

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $33.6 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. TASK ORDER AGAINST BPA HSHQDC-07-A-00038

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Office of Procurement Operations).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $33.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-09-29. End: 2009-01-15.

What was the specific justification for not competing this substantial contract award?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED' under a BPA call. Typically, this implies the services were either unique, urgently needed, or already covered by favorable terms within the existing BPA. A thorough review would require access to the BPA's justification for sole-source or limited competition.

How does the $33.6M value compare to similar administrative management consulting contracts awarded by DHS?

Without specific details on the scope of services rendered, direct comparison is challenging. However, $33.6M is a significant sum for consulting. Benchmarking would require analyzing contracts with similar NAICS codes (541611) and contract durations, ideally those awarded competitively to establish a price baseline.

What is the expected impact on taxpayer value given the non-competed nature of this award?

The lack of competition inherently raises concerns about taxpayer value. While the BPA might offer efficiencies, it bypasses the competitive process that typically drives down prices. The actual value depends on the quality of services delivered and whether the negotiated BPA rates were indeed fair and reasonable.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $33,608,386

Exercised Options: $33,608,386

Current Obligation: $33,608,386

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HSHQDC07A00038

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline