DHS FEMA awards $22.7M for facility support services to OMNI CORPORATION, a 5-year contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $22,729,854 ($22.7M)
Contractor: Omni Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security
Start Date: 2003-10-29
End Date: 2008-12-31
Contract Duration: 1,890 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: FACILITY SUPPORT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: EMMITSBURG, FREDERICK County, MARYLAND, 21727
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Homeland Security obligated $22.7 million to OMNI CORPORATION for work described as: FACILITY SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the duration and scope of facility support services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration of 5 years presents potential for long-term performance but also risks of price escalation. 4. The contract is for facility support services, a common requirement across federal agencies. 5. Performance is located in Maryland, a region with a significant federal presence.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $22.7 million over five years for facility support services appears to be within a reasonable range for the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facility management in the federal sector would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs for the government, assuming the scope was well-defined.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while initial solicitations might have had exclusions, the final award was made through a broad competitive process. The presence of 11 bids suggests a healthy level of competition, which typically drives down prices and encourages innovation from offerors.
Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition for this contract is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely resulted in a more cost-effective solution for facility support services compared to a sole-source or limited competition award.
Public Impact
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) personnel and operations benefit from maintained facilities. Services include general facility upkeep, maintenance, and potentially related support functions. The geographic impact is primarily within Maryland, supporting federal operations in that state. The contract supports the federal workforce by ensuring functional and safe working environments.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in facility support services over a 5-year period.
- Reliance on a single contractor for essential facility functions could pose risks if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition indicates a competitive market for these services.
- Long contract duration allows for contractor investment in efficiency and specialized knowledge.
Sector Analysis
Facility support services encompass a broad range of activities essential for the operation and maintenance of government buildings and infrastructure. This sector includes services like janitorial, maintenance, security, and groundskeeping. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, with spending often concentrated in areas with high federal agency presence. This contract fits within the broader Facilities Support Services NAICS code 561210.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While OMNI CORPORATION is the prime contractor, there is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are involved in the supply chain or if there are opportunities for them to participate in future contract renewals or similar procurements.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) contracting officers and program managers. Performance monitoring, quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs), and regular reporting requirements are standard mechanisms to ensure contractor compliance and service delivery. The contract's fixed-price nature incentivizes the contractor to manage costs effectively, but oversight is still crucial to ensure quality and adherence to the statement of work.
Related Government Programs
- General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules for facility maintenance and management
- Department of Defense (DoD) facility support contracts
- Other agency-specific facility operations and maintenance contracts
Risk Flags
- Contract duration may lead to price escalation risk.
- Potential for scope creep in facility support services.
Tags
facility-support-services, department-of-homeland-security, federal-emergency-management-agency, omni-corporation, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, maryland, naics-561210, contract-value-22m, contract-duration-5-years
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Homeland Security awarded $22.7 million to OMNI CORPORATION. FACILITY SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is OMNI CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Federal Emergency Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $22.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-10-29. End: 2008-12-31.
What is the historical spending trend for facility support services by FEMA?
Analyzing historical spending data for FEMA's facility support services reveals a consistent need for these operations. While specific figures for prior years are not detailed here, the agency's mission often requires maintaining numerous facilities, especially during disaster response and recovery efforts. This contract, awarded in 2003 and ending in 2008, represents a significant investment in ensuring operational readiness and a functional environment for FEMA personnel. Understanding the year-over-year expenditure trends would provide context on the agency's evolving needs and budget allocation for facility management, potentially showing increases or decreases based on operational tempo and infrastructure investments.
How does OMNI CORPORATION's performance on this contract compare to industry benchmarks for facility support services?
Assessing OMNI CORPORATION's performance requires access to contract performance reports, past performance evaluations, and potentially user feedback or inspection records, which are not provided in the summary data. Without these specific metrics, a direct comparison to industry benchmarks is challenging. However, the fact that the contract was awarded under full and open competition with 11 bidders suggests that OMNI CORPORATION likely met the technical and financial qualifications required. Continued performance would be evaluated against the firm fixed-price contract's statement of work, focusing on timeliness, quality of services, and adherence to safety and regulatory standards.
What are the key risks associated with a 5-year firm fixed-price contract for facility support services?
A primary risk with a 5-year firm fixed-price contract for facility support services is the potential for unforeseen cost increases for the contractor due to inflation, changes in labor costs, or unexpected maintenance needs that were not adequately scoped. If these costs rise significantly, the contractor may face reduced profit margins or attempt to cut corners on service quality to maintain profitability. Conversely, if the initial pricing was too high, taxpayers may have overpaid. Another risk is the potential for the contractor to become complacent over a long period, leading to a decline in service quality if not actively managed and overseen by the agency.
What is the typical market size for federal facility support services?
The federal government is a substantial market for facility support services, with annual spending often in the billions of dollars across various agencies. This market encompasses a wide array of services, including maintenance, repair, custodial, security, and groundskeeping. Agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA), Department of Defense (DoD), and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) are major consumers. The market is characterized by a mix of large prime contractors and numerous small businesses, often operating as subcontractors. Factors influencing market size include the number of federal buildings, their age and condition, and the specific operational requirements of each agency.
Were there any specific performance issues or successes documented for OMNI CORPORATION on this contract?
The provided summary data does not contain specific details regarding performance issues or successes for OMNI CORPORATION on this particular contract. Contract performance information is typically documented in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or similar internal agency records. Without access to these detailed reports, it is impossible to definitively state whether the contractor exceeded expectations, met requirements, or faced challenges during the contract period from 2003 to 2008. The renewal or continuation of contracts often serves as an indirect indicator of satisfactory performance, but specific documentation is necessary for a thorough assessment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: EME2003RP0001
Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 26865 IH-45 SOUTH FEEDER, BUFFALO, TX, 17
Business Categories: Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,729,854
Exercised Options: $22,729,854
Current Obligation: $22,729,854
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-10-29
Current End Date: 2008-12-31
Potential End Date: 2008-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-08-01
More Contracts from Omni Corporation
- Facilities Support Services:logistics, Janitorial, Facilities and Grounds Maintenance for Fletc Artesia, NM 88210 — $26.4M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Netc Facility Maintenance and Student Support — $25.4M (Department of Homeland Security)
Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts
- THE United States Coast Guard HAS a Requirement to Procure UP to Twenty-Six (26) Fast Response Cutters (frcs) on a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Basis With an Economic Price Adjustment (EPA). Phase II of the FRC Program Will Complete the Fleet for a Total of 58 Cutters — $2.1B (Bollinger Shipyards Lockport, L.L.C.)
- Design and Construct NEW Vertical Barrier and Power Distribution, Lighting, Cameras, Equipment Shelters and Linear Ground Detection System (lgds) in Hildago County, NM — $1.8B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Production&delivery of National Security Cutter (NSC) 6 — $1.7B (Huntington Ingalls Incorporated)
- YUM-2 Vertical Border and Waterborne Barrier Construction — $1.7B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)
- Construct Vertical Border Barrier — $1.6B (Fisher Sand & Gravel CO)