DHS Coast Guard Awards $8M for Navigation Systems, Exhausting FY06 Funds

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,006,156 ($18.0M)

Contractor: Integrated Coast Guard Systems LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2007-01-12

End Date: 2009-10-11

Contract Duration: 1,003 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: IT

Official Description: THIS AMENDMENT IS TO PRICE OUT HOW THE PR WILL MOVE FORWARD. THE REMAINDER OF AVAILABLE FY06 FUNDS ($1,064,942) WILL BE EXHAUSTED TOWARD THIS EFFORT, WITH $6,933,244 OF FY07 MONIES USED TO FUND THE REMAINDER OF THE CLIN. COTR - JERONE GALLOWAY 571-218-3368

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22209

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $18.0 million to INTEGRATED COAST GUARD SYSTEMS LLC for work described as: THIS AMENDMENT IS TO PRICE OUT HOW THE PR WILL MOVE FORWARD. THE REMAINDER OF AVAILABLE FY06 FUNDS ($1,064,942) WILL BE EXHAUSTED TOWARD THIS EFFORT, WITH $6,933,244 OF FY07 MONIES USED TO FUND THE REMAINDER OF THE CLIN. COTR - JERONE GALLOWAY 571-218-3368 Key points: 1. Significant funding allocated for navigation systems, utilizing remaining FY06 and FY07 appropriations. 2. Contract awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Potential risk of funding exhaustion if project scope exceeds allocated budget. 4. Focus on aeronautical and nautical systems indicates a critical need for operational support.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount is $8,000,000. Without specific unit cost data or historical benchmarks for similar navigation systems, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the funding strategy of exhausting available FY06 funds suggests a need to obligate remaining resources.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically allows for the widest range of potential bidders and can lead to more competitive pricing. The price discovery mechanism relies on the competitive bids submitted.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized efficiently through a competitive process, but the full impact depends on the value delivered by the navigation systems.

Public Impact

Enhances U.S. Coast Guard's search, detection, and navigation capabilities. Supports critical maritime and aeronautical operations for national security. Investment in advanced systems may improve operational efficiency and safety.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Funding exhaustion strategy
Potential for scope creep

Positive Signals

Full and open competition
Investment in critical infrastructure

Sector Analysis

This award falls under the 'Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing' sector. Spending in this area is crucial for defense and homeland security agencies to maintain operational readiness and technological superiority.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or if opportunities were missed.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the U.S. Coast Guard, a component of the Department of Homeland Security. Oversight would involve monitoring contract performance, adherence to scope, and financial expenditures to ensure accountability.

Related Government Programs

Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing
Department of Homeland Security Contracting
U.S. Coast Guard Programs

Risk Flags

Funding strategy may indicate budget pressures.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in provided data.
No small business participation noted.
Potential for scope creep impacting cost and schedule.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $18.0 million to INTEGRATED COAST GUARD SYSTEMS LLC. THIS AMENDMENT IS TO PRICE OUT HOW THE PR WILL MOVE FORWARD. THE REMAINDER OF AVAILABLE FY06 FUNDS ($1,064,942) WILL BE EXHAUSTED TOWARD THIS EFFORT, WITH $6,933,244 OF FY07 MONIES USED TO FUND THE REMAINDER OF THE CLIN. COTR - JERONE GALLOWAY 571-218-3368

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTEGRATED COAST GUARD SYSTEMS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-01-12. End: 2009-10-11.

What is the specific performance capability expected from these navigation systems, and how does it compare to industry standards?

The provided data does not detail the specific performance capabilities of the navigation systems. A thorough analysis would require reviewing the contract's statement of work (SOW) to understand the technical requirements, expected accuracy, reliability, and integration with existing Coast Guard platforms. Benchmarking against similar systems procured by other agencies or in the commercial sector would be necessary to assess value.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will their achievement be measured to ensure effectiveness?

The data does not specify the KPIs for this contract. Effective oversight would involve defining measurable KPIs related to system performance, reliability, user satisfaction, and timely delivery. Regular performance reviews and acceptance testing by the Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) are crucial for ensuring the government receives the intended value and that the systems meet operational needs.

Given the funding strategy of exhausting FY06 funds, what is the risk of cost overruns or schedule delays if the project scope expands?

The strategy of using remaining FY06 funds and supplementing with FY07 monies suggests a potential for budget constraints. If the project scope expands beyond the initial estimates, there is a significant risk of cost overruns or schedule delays, especially if additional funding is not readily available. Robust change management and contingency planning are essential to mitigate these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Navigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments Manufacturing › Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (3)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 300 M ST SE STE 685, WASHINGTON, DC, 20003

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,006,156

Exercised Options: $18,006,156

Current Obligation: $18,006,156

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DTCG2302C2DW001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline