DHS Spends $24.7M on Armed Guard Services in Southern California via Competitive Delivery Order

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,738,955 ($24.7M)

Contractor: Paragon Systems Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Homeland Security

Start Date: 2008-03-14

End Date: 2008-12-31

Contract Duration: 292 days

Daily Burn Rate: $84.7K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: ARMED GUARD SERVICES THROUGHOUT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Place of Performance

Location: LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90001

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Homeland Security obligated $24.7 million to PARAGON SYSTEMS INC for work described as: ARMED GUARD SERVICES THROUGHOUT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $24.7 million for security services. 2. Competition was present, indicated by 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER'. 3. Risk is moderate, involving physical security and personnel. 4. Sector is primarily security services, supporting homeland security operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract was awarded via a competitive delivery order, suggesting a reasonable price discovery process. Benchmarking against similar contracts for armed guard services in California would provide further insight into value.

Cost Per Unit: $84,722 (annualized)

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Awarded as a competitive delivery order, indicating multiple vendors likely competed. This method generally promotes price competition and ensures fair market value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from competitive bidding, which aims to secure services at the best possible price for the government.

Public Impact

Ensures security for federal facilities and personnel in a major metropolitan area. Supports law enforcement and homeland security missions. Provides employment opportunities within the private security sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the security and protective services sector. Spending benchmarks for similar government contracts for armed guard services in California can vary widely based on location, threat level, and service requirements.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Homeland Security, Office of Procurement Operations, suggesting established oversight mechanisms. However, the effectiveness of oversight for time and materials contracts requires continuous monitoring.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

security-guards-and-patrol-services, department-of-homeland-security, ca, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Homeland Security awarded $24.7 million to PARAGON SYSTEMS INC. ARMED GUARD SERVICES THROUGHOUT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PARAGON SYSTEMS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Homeland Security (Office of Procurement Operations).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-03-14. End: 2008-12-31.

What was the average hourly rate paid to armed guards under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the average hourly rate. The contract type is 'TIME AND MATERIALS', and the total award was $24.7 million over 292 days. To determine the hourly rate, one would need to know the total labor hours expended and the agreed-upon markups for materials and overhead.

What specific security risks were identified that necessitated armed guard services?

The data does not detail the specific security risks. However, contracts for armed guard services are typically awarded in response to identified threats to federal facilities, personnel, or sensitive information. These could range from potential terrorism threats to vandalism or unauthorized access.

How effectively did the competitive delivery order process ensure cost savings compared to other procurement methods?

The competitive delivery order process generally promotes cost savings by allowing multiple vendors to bid on specific requirements. While the exact savings are not quantifiable from this data alone, the 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER' designation suggests a deliberate effort to leverage market competition to achieve a favorable price for the government.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesInvestigation and Security ServicesSecurity Guards and Patrol Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPINGHOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: SRS Critical Infrastructure Security LLC (UEI: 355790924)

Address: 14160 NEWBROOK DR STE. 210, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,738,955

Exercised Options: $24,738,955

Current Obligation: $24,738,955

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS07F0418K

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-03-14

Current End Date: 2008-12-31

Potential End Date: 2008-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2019-02-13

More Contracts from Paragon Systems Inc

View all Paragon Systems Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Homeland Security Contracts

View all Department of Homeland Security contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending